Q&A with Michelle McAttee begins at 25:45… aborted foetal cell lines… deliberate withholding of info from public… Covid injections made in China… Remdesivir (aka Veklury) made by Pfizer for Gilead1which the WHO recommends AGAINST using for Covid-19…
Basically, the vaccines are causing heart injury in at least 2.8% of people who get the shot. So 7M Americans now have hearts damaged by the COVID vaccine. He admits the number could be over 100M. The fact that the FAA *quietly* changed the EKG parameters for pilots suggests that the vaccine is causing a huge number of pilots to fail their screening. This is a tacit admission of a huge problem.
Age-stratified infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population
The largest burden of COVID-19 is carried by the elderly, and persons living in nursing homes are particularly vulnerable. However, 94% of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86% is younger than 60 years. The objective of this study was to accurately estimate the infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 among non-elderly people in the absence of vaccination or prior infection… we identified 40 eligible national seroprevalence studies covering 38 countries with pre-vaccination seroprevalence data…
By “subversion” he meant the subversion of a nation’s political and economic culture, and also subversion of a people’s perception of reality. As he put it:
It is overt and open. You can see it with your own eyes. All you have to do—all American mass media has to do—is to unplug the bananas from their ears, open up their eyes, and they can see it. There’s no mystery. …. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. It’s a great brainwashing process. … You cannot change their mind. Even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and illogical behavior.
I’m frequently reminded of Mr. Bezemenov’s remarks when I read Steve Kirsch’s reports of his daily battle with adherents to the COVID-19 Vaccine Cult…
The study conducted in 399 participants [all unvaccinated1See press release here.] met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group
This death got no press coverage. Do you have any idea why? There are so many people who helped promote the narrative who have “died suddenly” including Oracle VP Joel Kallman, the guy who created the v-Safe adverse event reporting system and at least one member of the team who voted to approve the EUA (maybe someone in comments can help me on that one…it was stunning but I can’t find the reference).
Not only was there no press coverage, but no cause of death was listed. What a surprise!
But so many seem beyond the reach of calm logic. Refuse to even consider the mere possubility – despite multiple, plausible mechanisms of action – that these injections actually might be killing and maiming people…. destroying nervous, cardiovascular, reproductive and immune systems.
So perhaps a dramatic approach is warranted? Maybe, to borrow a pro-lockdown/mask slogan: if it saves just one life, it’s worth it?
In a post-fact culture, it’s nuanced
As evident from this Dec 21 chat between Christian Morris, Greg Moffitt, John Waters and Thomas Sheridan:
Mark Crispin Miller says:
… watch it as soon as you can—it’s a little over an hour—and share it far and wide. Although it makes some trivial mistakes, it is a very solid piece of work…
… this film will open many people’s eyes, which is (of course) why I am recommending it. The BBC has joined me in that expectation—which has impelled them… to try to kill it, with this attempted takedown by one Rachael Schraer….
… the general public and doctors don’t know what’s really happening; and they don’t even know that they don’t know.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra (1:37:00)
Nov 29, Dallas, Texas Drs. McCullough and Malhotra spoke about:
military style approach
deceptive use of science and data.1E.g. Relative Risk vs Absolute Risk.
regulatory, media and political capture
censorship and being attacked
Pfizer and Moderna’s original trials showed greater risk of harm from injection than of catching COVID…
… I was cautious during the early months of the vaccine campaign but as the deaths accrued shortly after injection I could not remain silent by the late winter of 2021. Dr. Malhotra in his presentation painfully describes his journey of emotional distraught, losing his father and last remaining first-degree family member, and then his relentless pursuit of the truth culminating in the publication of a pair of analyses concluding all COVID-19 vaccinations are not sufficiently safe nor effective to remain in use today… Together we have hundreds of published scientific reports and opinions. We have delivered thousands of lectures and speeches. We both have suffered professional retaliation for telling the truth. We are not wrong about these conclusions.
Here, we describe the cardiac autopsy findings in five persons who have died unexpectedly within seven days following anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination, with vaccine-induced myocardial inflammation representing the likely or possible cause of death. Our findings establish the histological phenotype of lethal vaccination-associated myocarditis.
This a small study: 5 out of 25 people who died unexpectedly within 20 days of a COVID-19 injection. But hard to dismiss as coincidental given the mounting evidence1e.g this, this, this, all this and that the authors reported:
During the last 20 years of autopsy service at Heidelberg University Hospital we did not observe comparable myocardial inflammatory infiltration. This was validated by histological re-evaluation of age- and sex-matched cohorts from three independent periods, which did not reveal a single case showing a comparable cardiac pathology….
Had “Turtles All The Way Down”1The subheading “Vaccine Science and Myth” distinguishes from John Green’s older book of the same name. received its deserved attention from the international medical community when it was written one year prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the world may very well have avoided the predicament that we are in today.
… wide range of topics including [masks,] censorship of doctors, AB2098 (the California doctor censorship bill that was just signed into law), clinical practice guidelines, why her peers are retiring in large numbers, MIS-C1“Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children” rates in children, whether she has been able to red-pill anyone (short answer is no; she talked to 30 of her peers and red-pilled 0), are GMO foods safe or not, how can doctors be looking the other way while we give our kids unsafe drugs, and more.
My friends … asked me incredulously, “Why would the medical community silence doctors who are trying to save lives?”
They didn’t believe my answer.
So I wanted to interview a doctor who is very highly respected and who is not an “anti-vaxxer” to explain it to them…
He regrets not having done his homework and trusting others when he took the shot. It was only after he looked at the data directly himself, he said the data was crystal clear…
[Dr.] Meryl Nass, like Dr. Marik, has been punished for speaking out.
Meryl Nass explains why most doctors did not speak out against the COVID-19 treatment protocol or even bother to look at the data: they trust the system…
“if [Fauci] creates a standard and that is the standard and you vary from it, if anything happens to your patient, you are liable to the charge of malpractice. If you use his standard and all the patients die, you can’t be sued because that’s the standard of care.”
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.