Biological realities mean RNA can’t pandemic… and he too was tricked into asking the wrong questions about the (still on-going) pandemic illusion. Central to the illusion was PCR not using ‘nested primers’ – allowing it find signals that were likely there in the background all along.
He also talks about the pain of being let go by Children’s Health Defense, the guilt he feels for not speaking out earlier about the transfections and how we need to apologise to, and seek forgiveness from the young. Because it is they who will have to live with the consequences of our compliance as ‘the edge of knowledge’ is pushed forward by those driving the fracturing of humanity.
“The evidence is there but not broadcast on the mainstream. Dr Jay Couey was the science advisor to Robert F Kennedy and the Children’s Health Defence. What we discuss here today is information that you have not heard before and the explanations from Jay are incredible. we hope you share this information and allow others to see how big the lie is that we have been sold. We can only hope it allows others to step forward and speak the truth rather than carry the burden of living the lie to protect the narrative.
(26th March, since posting I’ve additionally learned oximeters might not only be unreliable, but can also give different results based on skin colour.)
Since COVID more and more people are measuring their blood-oxygen levels, watching for a threshold they’ve been told to worry about.
Interestingly, those thresholds are set by both mainstream and freedom oriented medics. For instance, the FLCCC say get to hospital if blood-oxygen saturation drops below 94%.
But…
… Scott Schara sees oximeter use as pivotal in the lead up to the medical murder of his Down’s Syndrome daughter, Grace.
… Leslie Batts regrets using one too. Because it opened the door to the killing of her husband in hospital.
Knowledge misapplied or a psyop?
Most of us think oximeters are a useful tool. But…
On Monday I was telling a friend about the impact finding JJ Couey has had on me.
My friend has been exploring the plandemic since 2020. Me since 2021. Yet he was still unaware of Couey while I only found Couey a few months ago. Two examples of how ‘the internet’ can leave us with limited perspectives despite our best efforts.
Couey might put that down to the cars we each ended up in. Cars whose passengers and drivers might be (wittingly or unwittingly) part of ‘The Scooby-Doo’ and affecting our perception of the train.
But there’s more to the ousted university research assistant professor than insightful analogies.
Biology as way out of the cave
Couey educates from a thorough understanding of biology and neuroscience – including in-depth knowledge and laboratory experience of transfection (which is what COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ do, and actually are).1Transfection is the insertion of foreign nucleic acids into a host’s eukaryotic cells (sources). Eukaryotic cells are those which contain “several membrane-bound structures, or organelles, which are specialized cellular subunits that carry out specific cellular functions.” (source also has a helpful graphic)
Because understanding the sacred biology of our world can expose the many myths underpinning COVID and other aspects of modern medicine – like the US childhood vaccination schedule. Also ‘the meddlers‘ keeping us distracted from important truths.
So, with his biology flashlight pointed forward he’s showing us a way out of the cave.2Plato’s Cave: “… describes a group of people who have lived chained to the wall of a cave all their lives, facing a blank wall. The people watch shadows projected on the wall from objects passing in front of a fire behind them and give names to these shadows. The shadows are the prisoners’ reality, but are not accurate representations of the real world.”
For my friend. Maybe you too?
My friend wanted an introduction to Couey. Challenging, given the scope of Couey’s insights and prolific output.
Because some interesting characters3If you want to see some of who were there, watch the Q&A on Rumble ask interesting questions which get Couey talking about many things – including virus/no-virus, vaccination, clones, genomes, an adversary, his own stupidity and more.
Plus, some of his humanity is captured at the end.
Transfection is the insertion of foreign nucleic acids into a host’s eukaryotic cells (sources). Eukaryotic cells are those which contain “several membrane-bound structures, or organelles, which are specialized cellular subunits that carry out specific cellular functions.” (source also has a helpful graphic)
2
Plato’s Cave: “… describes a group of people who have lived chained to the wall of a cave all their lives, facing a blank wall. The people watch shadows projected on the wall from objects passing in front of a fire behind them and give names to these shadows. The shadows are the prisoners’ reality, but are not accurate representations of the real world.”
Yesterday, on his Substack, he published his own recording of that conversation – with improved sound, subtitles AND an automated transcript.1Why is a transcript a big deal? Because if you think a person said something in an interview last week, you can search the transcript in seconds instead of replaying the entire interview.
“… My name is Jonathan Couey and I am a recovering academic neurobiologist. I had about… a 15 or 20 year career as an academic biologist… after speaking out against measures and mandates, I was told to go home from my position at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine as a research assistant professor, and I continued to speak out against the I don’t know what I would characterize it as other than nonsense, the biological nonsense that was being characterized as a pandemic.
Why is a transcript a big deal? Because if you think a person said something in an interview last week, you can search the transcript in seconds instead of replaying the entire interview.
Probably too long for a newbie, but the first 59 minutes are a good synopsis of JJ Couey’s perspective. After which he discusses yet more ‘dissident’ figures (in this case Bret Weinstein, Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch) who:
are broadcasting subtle pro Scooby-Doo / pro-train, messages1“Scooby-Doo” and “Train” mean nothing to you? Watch the 7 mins from 15:20 to 22:30
do not discuss glaringly obvious issues
get widely promoted2Unlike those who called the bullshit early. Such as Dr. Mike Yeadon, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Prof. Knut Wittkowski,
seem unable to reach certain conclusions – conclusions which seem inevitable if one has the humility and integrity to admit they had fallen for the train mime.
Yes, arguably some he talks about might simply be slower at catching on than others. But these highly educated, intelligent people are doing these things FOUR YEARS after the COVID story broke. That’s a long time. Is it any wonder he’d doubt them?
The Jessica mentioned at 01:03:55 is Jessica Hockett who is exploring the strange case of New York’s “mass casualty event” which demonstrates (amongst other things) there were no signs of ‘spread’. Her work can be found on Woodhouse76.com
The neuro-biologist and former university ‘microscope-jockey’ who studied (amongst other things) how mouse brains responded to transfection, is putting out insightful content.
Not only exposing the key myths and lies of “The Faith” which drive the confusion and distract from the multiple crimes, but also some of those who are perpetrating those myths and lies – who may or may not know what they are doing.
His streams don’t stay on his Twitch channel forever. So I’m compiling them into a playlist. Click the pic to access.
Neuro-biologist JJ Couey, reviews Nick Hudson’s Oct 11th presentation to the Actuarial Society of South Africa. A plain version can be watched on Pandata.org
(Apologies for the text/chat replay on the screen. Nothing I can do about it.)
Transcript
Copied from the Pandata substack. Contains an Addendum responding to some questions he was asked on the day…
NOV 12th: live-link to some German Parliamentarians
“… After I’d finished… The whole place was on its feet. They were clapping like mad. It went on for an embarrassing 2-3 minutes.
Gratified, I mumbled thanks for the opportunity to speak to them and ended the link.
I learned yesterday that dissenting voices in AfD had decided my opinions were too extreme and they’ve excised my presentation from the link to the session, which I understand has now been made public…
I’d been aware of him for a while. But, regrettably, no more so than any of the other scientists speaking out about the COVID scam.
Recently though, something about his interactions with Jessica Hockett and Denis Rancourt drew me back to explore his views more thoroughly.
It’s been painful. Slowly coming to realise, acknowledge and admit…
… I had been skilfully played and fallen for The Scooby-Doo myself and…
… that many who I hoped and believed were gonna save us, aren’t…
… because they are (probably unconsciously in many cases) fostering an illusion of consensus that protects and perpetuates The Faith. Like myself at times since my first article here in 2021.
It’s also been humbling. To realise that I wasn’t as awake as I considered myself – and acknowledge thinking myself superior to others who weren’t awake. Plus, to face the possibility that these latest learnings about this great awful deception might not be my last.
I’m not quite yet able to ‘elevator pitch’ these new understandings. But JJ Couey is honing his presentations all the time and I’m finding his analogies increasingly helpful.
Like the train mime…. (from c 27:00 in his recent talk with Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics International) 1Yes that’s Irishman Dr. Gerard Waters you hear during the preamble
Denis Rancourt is interviewed by JJCouey about his paper which evaluates whether the Nobel-Prize-winning COVID-19 vaccine has actually saved millions of lives.
Looks like it comes down to the assumptions made when inputting data into the model… and the credulity of those accepting the models answers as real.
If you really want to dive in, helpfully Rancourt has provided links to some resources mentioned.
Thanks to the cryptic Sage Hana for bringing Jessica Hockett to my attention. Her recent chat with JJ Couey is littered with pertinent questions. Sage highlighted a few…
If the novel respiratory virus is killing people like crazy, shouldn’t it have been preceded by the ER1Emergency Room death numbers?
… Where were all the bodies?
27,000? Huh? The freezer trucks were not full, no matter what Donald2Donald Trump said. The hospitals were not full.
Why didn’t the same pathogen wipe out people in other cities at the same “smart bomb” rate. 247% increase across all ages?
Former Australian Medical Association President and a former MP, Dr. Kerryn Phelps, just defected and is on our side!
A wide-ranging article in The Chronicle1Archive. reveals that she and her wife suffered devastating injuries from Covid vaccines. Dr. Phelps submitted her reports of injuries, as well as her mistreatment and silence imposed on Australian doctors, to the Parliament of Australia.
Another medical professional speaking out. Great! Maybe the tide is turning?
Australian Media non-combative?
Phelps joins a growing number of high-profile physicians worldwide, including British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra and oncologist Professor Angus Dalgeish, who have turned against the shots after publicly supporting them in 2021.
But Phelps’s history of aggressive advocacy for the Covid vaccines – and all Covid countermeasures – makes her comments particularly hard to dismiss…
As striking as Phelps’s warning is the reception that Australian media gave it. While other physicians have faced scorn for their recent efforts to discuss potential vaccine injuries, Phelps is being treated largely respectfully.
Maybe the obvious failure of the vaccines to prevent Covid infection is leading to a larger reassessment of their benefit and risks, or maybe Phelps’s advocacy for other Covid countermeasures improves her credibility with journalists. Either way, though, the wall of silence around vaccine injuries seems to be cracking. At least a little.
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
