More mask mischief

The ScienceTM just can’t help itself. Despite the glaringly obvious.

There is a new systematic review of 1732 mask studies to determine whether masks work. It is on a preprint server meaning it is not peer-reviewed.

Almost all of the 1732 potential studies were eliminated so they only looked at 13 studies with a total of 243 COVID infections between the two groups.

One of the 13 studies that was not eliminated was done in 2004 which is impressive since SARS-CoV-2 didn’t exist at the time.

From that, they conclude that masks provide nearly a 90% risk reduction of getting infected.

That is preposterous.

Steve Kirsch

More on masks: Tom Woods | Ian Miller1He’s done several mask articles | Swiss Policy Research2Direct link to aerosol demo video.

Still trust mask science?

Then try the Covid Charts Quiz.

Yes, the charts are pre-injections, so it is dated. But if they are effective you should still be able to spot the influence of masks (and lockdowns).

Shouldn’t you?

Trying to make you believe the virus came from nature.

It is 2.5 years later and two papers appear on the same day?!? Should you believe it? I do not. Neither does Robert Malone or Chris Martenson. Here’s why.

Steve Kirsch

Other: Robert Malone | Chris Martenson1“Media Lies About Origins Of Covid” – premiered on 16 Mar 2022 but still relevant… including the name Kristian Andersen. | BBC: lying by omission?

  • 1
    “Media Lies About Origins Of Covid” – premiered on 16 Mar 2022 but still relevant… including the name Kristian Andersen.

The Control Group, medical ethics and parallel communities

Friday 22nd July, Dr. Robert Verkerk1Alliance for Natural Health and Dr. Katarina Lindley2World Council for Health and Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (see her 2019 Direct Primary Care talk on this page). tell the Corona Investigative Committee about a paper on the control group survey.

Plus, a new medical journal and the need to return to traditional medical ethics and create our own community hubs and medical systems.

Paxlovid

By now you’ll have heard of the new wonder <snigger> drug approved for use with COVID. Especially as it didn’t help Dr. Anthony Fauci recently and his COVID rebounded.

Effective and safe, so approved for us by the same experts who said…

  • lockdowns worked (but they didn’t, plus did colossal damage);
  • masks didn’t work (until suddenly they did, so we put them on and they did nothing);
  • vaccines would end the pandemic (but they didn’t, so we need more and more of them)1Quadruple-injected US President Joe Biden is the latest to demonstrate their effectiveness!

… and thankfully kept us safe from useless, dangerous interventions like ivermectin.

“The Uncensored Citizen” collated some sources on Paxlovid.

The Forbidden Debate

He was only supposed to present audience questions. But Del Bigtree saw an opportunity.1at The Better Way Conference opening evening, May 20th

So, finally, we got a public discussion about vaccines!

His follow up with Geert Vanden Bossche2… scroll to 1:06:27 is equally educational.

Official episode page.

Sacrificing Science… and children?

Looking at their respective ACIP1Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and VRBPAC2Vaccine and Related Biologics Products Advisory Committee decisions, the CDC and FDA seem to be.

The Jaxen Report (52:40-1:42:10) in this June 23rd Highwire episode has recordings of their data-less decision making processes. The exposé by the ‘hero mother’ Kelley can be found here3… and here’s her interview with Tom Woods.

While watching, remember… there will never be enough high-quality study data to persuade the FDA and CDC support early treatment with ivermectin or similar protocols… yet a brand new injectable gene therapy can be endorsed! with hardly any data from weak, unblinded studies-!!

More clips on the official episode page.

  • 1
    Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
  • 2
    Vaccine and Related Biologics Products Advisory Committee
  • 3
    … and here’s her interview with Tom Woods

On “Trusting The Science”

In his well-documented June 26th episode double-jabbed1but not taking any more for reasons of conscience. Maajid Nawaz[ spoke with two HART members.

First, retired clinical psychologist Dr. Gary Sidley discussed how compliance is being engineered. Scroll back to the start to catch him. Because…

… I set the video to start with pro-vax, diagnostic pathologist Dr. Claire Craig exposing the poor quality data the FDA used to endorse injecting young children.2She also highlighted these issues on The Highwire, June 23rd

So poor it is actually a gift to truth tellers!

Immune Imprinting, Comirnaty and Omicron

The mRNA technology inventors heavily referenced, two-part series on why the mRNA vaccines are not preventing Omicron infection.

… the data concerning immune imprinting demonstrate that vaccinating very young children with a genetic vaccine which expresses a Spike antigen from a virus that has not been circulating for a very long time (with the consequent immune imprinting) is either malevolent or madness or both.

Dr. Robert Malone

Part 1

Part 2

The Quest for Open Science

… questions have become very uncomfortable answers, speculation has become truth and conspiracy theories have become spoiler alerts.

Nick Hudson

The chairman of PANDA presents data, applies critical thought and challenges assumptions.1More presentations from ‘The Quest‘ and other PANDA series on their Odysee channel.

He mentions his talk given last year that was censored on YouTube. In case you missed it here is The Ugly Truth About The COVID-19 Lockdowns and its Q&As:

Continue reading The Quest for Open Science

“I’m not against the vaccines. I’m against being stupid.”

July 1st saw the regrettable death of Dr. Vladimir ‘Zev’ Zelenko.1From a rare cancer.

The World Council For Health tribute included a Twitter thread highlighting how much he bothered promoters of The ScienceTM (like Twitter itself!). But his first interview with Jerm2August 2021. The second was with the additional company of Dr. Peter McCullough, February 2022. provides deeper insight into:

  • his cancer
  • developing the Zelenko Protocol
  • helping Donald Trump
  • censorship
  • COVID injection dangers
  • genocide via the sugar-coated bombs of World War 33… the vaccines, which will be triggered in the future via Anti-body Dependent Enhancement (ADE)
  • … and a glorious future for humanity!
  • 1
    From a rare cancer.
  • 2
    August 2021. The second was with the additional company of Dr. Peter McCullough, February 2022.
  • 3
    … the vaccines, which will be triggered in the future via Anti-body Dependent Enhancement (ADE)

Dr. Hedley Rees

Managing Director of Pharmaflow. Held senior positions at Bayer UK, British Biotech, Vernalis and others. Author and advocate for modernisation of the pharmaceutical industry.1e.g. Taming The Big Pharma Monster: by Speaking Truth to Power (2019)

Testified to the Corona Investigative Committee on July 1st 2021 that evidence suggests COVID injections were rushed to market with significant shortcuts to make money rather than deliver the safest and most effective product possible.

Also…

  • … how MHRA/EMA did not follow its own rules and guidelines described in its Orange Guide, so did not meet their own terms for conditional approval of the injections.
  • … how -70°C (ultra-frozen) injections were a gross contravention of GMP2Good Manufacturing Practice as they were not fully finished as unit doses on leaving the factory, and had to circumvent pharmaceutical wholesalers because they were not equipped to handle those temperatures.

A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation

Friday 1st July, Margaret Anna Alice spoke with the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee about framing, philanthropathy,1A term she coined democide, her “why” questions and their answers.2She ran out of time, but here are her promised notes.

Her WHYs are comprehensive3As are Steve Kirsch‘s. and grouped into four categories:

What answers does she come to?

Continue reading A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation

Scientific Misconduct Uncovered In The TOGETHER Ivermectin Trial

If you still Trust The ScienceTM it must be because you have no idea how it is being done.

Dr. Edmund Fordham mentions analyses done by Alexandros Marinos on his Substack.

Here’s the list of 56 issues identified by reviewers of the trial.1You don’t need to understand each issue. Instead perhaps ask why the trial has yet to be retracted despite this HUGE list of peer-identified issues… and… still no sign of the promised raw, patient-level data.

See also Dr. Pierre Kory’s trilogy on the same trial.

  • 1
    You don’t need to understand each issue. Instead perhaps ask why the trial has yet to be retracted despite this HUGE list of peer-identified issues… and… still no sign of the promised raw, patient-level data.

Fact Check: Covid as a Leading Cause of Death in Children

Pro-ivermectin? No amount of favourable peer-reviewed double-blind, randomized controlled trials will satisfy authorities.

Pro-vaccine? Cite an obviously misleading pre-print1i.e. not yet peer-reviewed and your preferred way of worsening2Geert Vanden Bossche has warned about this several times. Check out 01:00 to 14:50 of The Highwire –Episode 273: Sacrificing Science. ending the pandemic will be endorsed.

Trust The ScienceTM

Even if it can be torn apart in minutes.

Continue reading Fact Check: Covid as a Leading Cause of Death in Children
  • 1
    i.e. not yet peer-reviewed
  • 2
    Geert Vanden Bossche has warned about this several times. Check out 01:00 to 14:50 of The Highwire –Episode 273: Sacrificing Science.

So bad no one can defend it?

Not even for $1,000,000?!

For months double-jabbed Steve Kirsch has been asking for someone, anyone, to debate him or a member of his team. Offering $1M to help motivate.1I’m sure they could decline or donate the money if they wished.

Winning the debate would be the quickest way to end vaccine-hesitancy. But even if they lost, someone from any of these areas just showing up would be at least reassuring:

Continue reading So bad no one can defend it?
  • 1
    I’m sure they could decline or donate the money if they wished.