But some people think a mask stops a virus.
Steve Kirsch is not one of them. So much so that he’s offering $250,000 to MIT, Harvard and Stanford Universities to produce convincing evidence.Continue reading Underwear doesn’t stop a fart
For its relentless pursuit of whatever objective it’s been given – regardless of the risks or damage to people.
Dr. Jessica Rose has cited a few instances based on what she’s finding in the released Pfizer safety documents. (I highly recommend subscribing to her Substack email list.)Continue reading Ya gotta admire “The Science”
JP Sears “life jacket” analogy keeps on giving.
If only the core topics weren’t so serious.
(If you’re not familiar, and wanna catch up, his first two life jacket videos are here).
As you scroll keep repeating “safe and effective, safe and effective…“
Not my title, but the title given by Governor Ron DeSantis himself.
- against employees being forced to mask
- supporting doctors in prescribing off-label drugs
- reducing the suggested isolation period for daycare and students – based on common sense and science (not PCR tests!)
- discouraging the creation of a two-tier society that marginalises people based on occupation and/or vaccination status.
So one of the things we want to do … is provide the most up to date, sound guidance that’s actually grounded in the data and in the evidence that we’ve accumulated over these last nearly two years. Simply relying on outdated CDC guidance, when the experience has completely undercut that, is not really a reasonable thing to do at this point.Gov Ron DeSantis
Florida is the Land of the Free and I wish there was more and I hope more States take the same path. But we are gonna stay free in Florida.SG Joe Ladapo
Watch the ten minute announcement here.
- 1Dr. Robert Malone welcomes the approach too.
… Angelia Desselle, Shawn Skelton and mother of 6 year old Milo discuss their injuries with double-jabbed Steve Kirsch on a Vaccine Safety Research Foundation weekly call.
The earlier minutes also give some background on how Steve Kirsch and Dr. Robert Malone both ‘woke up’ at around the same time.
A Substack by Dr. Pierre Kory is also mentioned. Here it is. He points out the CDC are now, finally, encouraging early treatment for Covid-19… just when some new, expensive drugs come out.
Florida’s Surgeon General coaches the public on how to talk with pro-mask doctors.
Smiling, relaxed, reassuring. Clearly a spreader of misinformation!
Watch the 2 minute clip here.
According to data and chart guy, Ian Miller.
He seems to make a good case. What do you think?
(P.S. He’s not saying it out loud, but his charts of the Canadian provinces, and Iceland, are each “black swans“. Ordinarily in science just one black swan would vanquish a hypothesis. But despite there now being quite a flock of them disproving COVID policies, some people still religiously follow The ScienceTM… even as it destroys them, their families, friends… and countries.)
… according to Dr. Robert Malone1At 11:04 during his January 6th interview with Patrick Bet-David – just a few days after his now-famous Joe Rogan interview aired and triggered an acceleration of censorship.2The original livestream happened on YouTube, but is no longer there. Apparently it violated the company’s Community Guidelines. However the Wayback Machine snapped it on Jan 7th (it may take a while to load and does not include a copy of the video itself – but confirms the livestream happened and had been seen 64,396 times by the time the snapshot was taken.
As I listened… and watched the PBD team do live searches to check some of Malone’s assertions… I marvelled at the horrible repressive, disrespectful, corrupt, truth-fearing world we have created.
We need a better world.
Here’s “The History of mRNA Vaccines” on Dr. Malone’s website – with links to his original papers and patents.
Here’s the Canadian Covid Care Alliance video Malone mentioned.
The “What If…” substack article in which Malone highlights the 40% excess death rate reported by a life insurance company.4The Margaret Menge source article Malone links to in this piece might not be viewable from the EU for GDPR reasons. But EU readers can view it on The Waybacck Machine.
The Mary Beth Pfeiffer article about the 40% excess deaths in the 18-64yr age cohort (a cohort not expected to die as much as they seem to have done). Graph from the same:
- 1At 11:04
- 2The original livestream happened on YouTube, but is no longer there. Apparently it violated the company’s Community Guidelines. However the Wayback Machine snapped it on Jan 7th (it may take a while to load and does not include a copy of the video itself – but confirms the livestream happened and had been seen 64,396 times by the time the snapshot was taken.
- 3I am no longer using the term psychosis but will leave it on my site for the record.
- 4The Margaret Menge source article Malone links to in this piece might not be viewable from the EU for GDPR reasons. But EU readers can view it on The Waybacck Machine.
How many black swans are needed to destroy a hypothesis?
If you are actually scientific, just one.
Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:
However if you are a believer in Covid-19 public health policies, no amount of black swans will convince you.
You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.
Only you know why you are doing that.
My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people
Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.
Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?
No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.
This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.
- 1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people
“Alberta has been fiddling again, revealing more useful information. Is jab #3 the worst of all?” asks Joel Smalley.
Alberta inadvertently confessed to fiddling the stats.
A good lesson in how the numbers are fiddled. Worth reading in full. But in case you’re not going to, here’s an insight:
Like everywhere else in the world they claim very impressive vaccine effectiveness by following the fraudulent standard set by the drug manufacturers in the pantomime clinical trials, i.e. to ignore the adverse outcomes in the first two weeks post administration.
But then they go one better and actually inflate the unvaccinated numbers too…Joel Smalley
- NGOs, Governments and medical institutions blocking innovative, safe and effective treatment protocols
- medical boards oppressing doctors for daring to try treating their patients
- fraudulent scientific papers and statements
- skewed statistics
- ignoring of natural immunity
- mainstream and social media censorship and cancellation of those advocating protocols or asking questions
- and more… (all being done for our sake of course!)…
… it’s been almost impossible to get a second opinion on Covid-19.
Until yesterday, January 24th, when Senator Ron Johnson held a Roundtable panel discussion in the US Senate.1766,148 views as I type A clever thing to do as the perspectives and testimonies of world renowned doctors, medical experts, researchers, legal and military professionals and members of the public are now in the senate record – and thus less censorable.
This discussion provides a different perspective on the global pandemic response and explores the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.
The panel starts at 40 minutes into the recording, then runs for almost 5 hours. Yes it’s long. But it’s an amazing 5 hours. Especially if you are a medical practitioner.2If you don’t have 5 hours here’s the highlights in 38 minutes.
More detailed time codes will be available in time. But here are the opening statements to get you started:
- 00:40:15 Sen. Ron Johnson
- 00:50:40 Dr. Peter McCullough
- 00:57:00 Dr. Ryan Cole
- 01:00:45 Dr. Harvey Risch
- 01:07:25 Dr. Pierre Kory
- 01:16:05 Dr. Richard Urso
- 01:28:00 Dr. Christina Parks
- 01:33:30 Dr. Mary Boden
- 01:38:30 Dr. Harpal Mangat
- 01:41:05 Dr. Paul Marik
- 01:50:10 Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
- 01:57:00 Dr. Robert Malone
- 02:03:15 Dr. David Wiseman
- 02:09:10 Dr. Christina Parks (vaccines on race)
- 02:12:15 Dr. Richard Urso (acknowledging Sen. Johnson)
- 02:13:20 Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
- 02:21:50 Open discussion begins…
- 1766,148 views as I type
- 2If you don’t have 5 hours here’s the highlights in 38 minutes.
While I don’t agree with everything he says (like Zuby, I’m not into using substances to expand awareness) I found it refreshing to hear Rav Aorora having a Real Talk with Zuby.1Video version on Zuby’s Odysee channel.
“Narrative vs Truth” is a wide ranging talk touching on faith, science, psychology, censorship, travel, fascism, lockdown, psychedelics… and more.
Calm, sensible, thoughtful, humourous and with the integrity to acknowledge he got things wrong and the courage to adjust his perspective. Great to see in someone so young.
If we want a better future we would do well to support men like Rav.
- 1Video version on Zuby’s Odysee channel.
Robert Malone recently shared his experience of his own potentially fatal vaccine adverse event and his recently discovering that his vaccine came from one of the ‘bad’ batches.
Malone’s account fits well with Mike Yeadon’s Jan 7th presentation to the 86th sitting of the Corona Investigative Committee.
Yeadon outlines evidence of possible premeditated murder, using “hot lots” of Covid injections. He can’t think of any benign reason that would explain the vast differences in numbers of adverse reactions between batches.
His presentation centres around these two slides.
Yeadon detailing the Covid lies on The Highwire, June 2021.
Video by Paul Schreyer:
- 1Backup duplicate site.
… and “they and others who tested positive were placed in quarantine but the virus continued to circulate“…
… what does that tell you about Covid testing, contact tracing, isolation and ‘vaccines’?
Real Science: “We thought testing would help us manage outbreaks. We thought minimising interaction and isolating close contacts would help slow the spread. We thought vaccines would stop the spread. So we would have reasonably expected that with ALL OF THEM COMBINED an outbreak would have been nearly impossible. Especially when everyone was tested before arriving on the base. But this ‘black swan’1I wrote about ‘black swans’ almost a year ago. Little did I know public health experts, Governments and media would still be ignoring them. event points to the need to face the reality that these interventions just don’t work for airborne viruses.”
Covidian Science: “Maybe the never-failed-us-until-now tests weren’t done properly? Maybe two negative ‘cases’ stood too close together and their negatives combined to create a positive, like in mathematics ?2That’s actually nonsense. But hey, I am after all trying to highlight that Covid Science is nonsensical! Maybe the scientists weren’t vaccinated enough? Maybe it was because they were so remote they got sloppy and didn’t isolate hard enough? Oh no, wait – I’ve got it! The article said nothing about masks. So clearly they weren’t masking! That’s it. The evidence is clear. Improper masking was behind the outbreak!”
Which kind of science do you follow?
In case someone realizes this story undermines ‘the narrative’ or creates ‘vaccine hesitancy’ and so takes it down, here’s a January 1st Wayback Machine version for posterity.