A comprehensive interview in which the “Mom, Catholic, and paralegal from Pennsylvania” describes her Covid awakening – and puts Covid in its geopolitical and legal context,
Includes an excellent summary of Pfizer trials whistleblower Brook Jackson’s story and how it both revealed and confirmed the “kill box” perspective that Katherine shares with Sasha Latypova.
… Bailiwicknews.substack.com she documents how since at least the Second World War, US Congress has been waging war on the people by passing legislation which makes it easier and easier for them [i.e. you and me!] to be destroyed – legally – by the pharmaceutical industry.
Dr Pierre Kory recently published ‘The War on Ivermectin’ which documents his crusade to recommend a safe, inexpensive, generic medicine as the key to ending the pandemic.
In this interview recorded at the recent Better Way Conference in Bath, we explore personal attacks, professional setbacks, and nefarious efforts of the world’s major health agencies and medical journals to dismiss and deny the efficacy of various repurposed drugs, whilst looking forward to what can be done to restore open science over the next decade.
The study conducted in 399 participants [all unvaccinated1See press release here.] met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group
The double-jabbed, cardiologist and former TV pundit – whose father (also a cardiologist) died because of a COVID vaccine induced cardiac-death – has switched from countering vaccine hesitancy to warning about vaccine dangers.
public health is declining
overall, medical drug impact is negative
most research can’t be trusted
relative risk reduction is highlighted, absolute risk ignored1Good explanation of difference between Absolute and Relative Risk
‘numbers needed to treat’ are ignored2Number of people one needs to treat to prevent one instance of an illness
consent is not fully informed
most doctors getting their info from media or pharma sources
… the general public and doctors don’t know what’s really happening; and they don’t even know that they don’t know.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra (1:37:00)
Nov 29, Dallas, Texas Drs. McCullough and Malhotra spoke about:
military style approach
deceptive use of science and data.1E.g. Relative Risk vs Absolute Risk.
regulatory, media and political capture
censorship and being attacked
Pfizer and Moderna’s original trials showed greater risk of harm from injection than of catching COVID…
… I was cautious during the early months of the vaccine campaign but as the deaths accrued shortly after injection I could not remain silent by the late winter of 2021. Dr. Malhotra in his presentation painfully describes his journey of emotional distraught, losing his father and last remaining first-degree family member, and then his relentless pursuit of the truth culminating in the publication of a pair of analyses concluding all COVID-19 vaccinations are not sufficiently safe nor effective to remain in use today… Together we have hundreds of published scientific reports and opinions. We have delivered thousands of lectures and speeches. We both have suffered professional retaliation for telling the truth. We are not wrong about these conclusions.
… but I’m sorry to tell you it’s much worse than that…
Pfizer did test the vaccine’s ability to reduce rates of “Covid-19”. To be specific, “Covid-19” means testing positive and being symptomatic.1Which differs from what we, the people have been trained to believe Covid-19 means: testing positive. Oisín. The data looked great by the way, Pfizer had a wonderful graph to show the effect. The blue line is infections in the unvaccinated, and the red line is infections in the vaccinated.
you can even outright damage people for life and they will be so raddled with stockholm syndrome that they will ramble that they would happily do it again, not even to “keep people safe” but so that “they could see people” in open and telling admission that they will gladly sacrifice freedom and bodily integrity upon the altar of “buying back a right to free association that should already have been inalienable” when faced with authoritarian pressure…
… but the funny things is somehow, despite all this, you show them a whiff of corporate financial impropriety and it’s suddenly
After her second shot during an early clinical trial1Her two brothers also participated. So she and her consenting parents were clearly not ‘anti-vax’. Maddie became paraplegic.2Maddie was one of c. 1000 in her study group. Implication: there could be a 1-in-1000 chance of paraplegia with your second Pfizer mRNA COVID injection.
To this day her many injuries are downplayed and ignored by vaccine pushers (like the trial leaders, doctors, nurses, Public Health officials, governments and the dying mainstream legacy media).
Authorized based on findings in just a few more than 8 mice (they won’t tell us the exact number) – none of which were autopsied afterward.1I’ve since discovered this Igor Chudov post indicating ten mice were involved. All of whom developed Covid by the way.
That’s how The ScienceTM is done now. As anticipated.2See here and here.
Meryl Nass, MD and Toby Rogers, Ph.D. watched last week’s 8-hour CDC meeting live. Then, with Dr. Brian Booker, they talked the Friday Roundtable‘3Hosted for the Children’s Health Defense by Polly Tommey and Aimee Villella-Mcbride through the:
authorisation process (brace yourself)
implications for national security and airline safety
Of all the harmful misinformation spread over the past couple of years, one of the most disturbing false narratives was targeted at the Nobel Prize winning HUMAN medicine, Ivermectin. We produced this short film to correct the narrative and to reveal the motive behind the smear campaign against one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era.
Deletion from Twitter, Linkedin increases followers elsewhere. But hard to know who you’re not reaching.
Reconcile with or prosecute the complicit…?
Just some of what Bret Weinstein and Dr. Robert Malone5“Dr. Robert Malone is an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines: including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies. https://www.rwmalonemd.com/https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/” Source. spoke about when they met during the Better Way Conference in May.
Their first conversation, June 2021, included tech tycoon Steve Kirsch:
In the future. Based on government opinion of your current OR past behaviour, speech, emails, texts etc,.
“Dr. Robert Malone is an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines: including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies. https://www.rwmalonemd.com/https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/” Source.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.