May 25th, the ICAN lawyer put the COVID-19 “vaccines” in context.1Speaking at The Arizona Novel COVID South Western Intergovernmental Committee hearings.
Do you know that…
… unlike any other consumer product producer, vaccine manufacturers are immune from liability for any harms their products might cause? (@ 10:25)
… some vaccines are deemed safe after just 3-5 days of safety studies? (@ 16:30)
… if a Pfizer trial investigator ‘feels’ Maddie de Garay’s paraplegia and other injuries are not related to her Covid injection, then that satisfies the FDA? (@ 1:16:40)
At around 23 minutes he brings us to the FDA website. To save you searching, here is the FDA’s Vaccines Licensed for Use in the United States page – and here is the package insert for the Hepatitis B Vaccine. Section 6.1 can be found on page 4.
Siri’s talk was part of a two-day event. As is to be expected these days, some media maligned the hearings and showed no interest in exploring any specific issues raised:
Here is the full 2-day event…Continue reading Aaron Siri gives testimony to the Arizona State Senate
Mid-September: twenty people travelled from a dozen states to Washington D.C. to ask the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for help.
Two had lost sons, 16 and 34 years old, soon after their shots. Three were in wheelchairs, including a girl, 14. A surgeon, nurse practitioner, teacher, and most others can no longer work. Once healthy and fit, many had been eager to be vaccinated.
They got a one hour Zoom call to their hotel conference room with the top vaccine official in the United States – Peter Marks.
Seems what he said amounted to:
… “Thank you so much for sharing”
“We don’t have any secrets here,” he continued. “Our goal is to make the public understand the benefits and risks of these vaccines.”
Just how FDA is doing that was left unclear…Mary Beth Pfeiffer
Steve Kirsch says they’re ignoring the risks
picked up in his survey
see also: Steve Kirsch
A heartbreaking new video released October 5th by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation shines a light on the growing number of children diagnosed with myocarditis after taking the Covid-19 vaccine.
Ethics Warning: contains adverts that imply
- it’s morally ok for society to ask its children risk their well-being for others and
- if those children are hurt by a medical product while taking that risk, the same profession whose product caused the damage can save them.1OpenVAERS.com shows not all are saved. Also the second ad ignores the life-threatening heart damage that is myocarditis; and the fact that before the jab rollout young people never experienced myocarditis or other issues at rates that warranted public-reassurance ads like this one. Or this one by the British Heart Foundation.
Tweeting about being in it got Dr. Peter McCullough Banned From Twitter.2Here’s what’s left of his tweet. Here’s his account. Oddly, Twitter still haven’t suspended Dr. Pierre Kory or others for retweeting it.
- 1OpenVAERS.com shows not all are saved. Also the second ad ignores the life-threatening heart damage that is myocarditis; and the fact that before the jab rollout young people never experienced myocarditis or other issues at rates that warranted public-reassurance ads like this one. Or this one by the British Heart Foundation.
Really, nothing says “Trust The Science” like asking for the data to be hidden for 75 years…
We’re now looking at the data – and it’s horrific.Dr. Paul Marik (23:00)
Dr. Sheila Furey started the event by recapping the approach of Virginian authorities and highlighting their absence. She then introduced Dr. Paul Marik (16:10).
Dr. Paul Marik summarised the medical tyranny and the health catastrophe resulting from its lies. For example the 6.8% of the Covid-jabbed experiencing side-effects and trial participant Maddie de Garay‘s paralysis.
Dr. Robert Malone, introduced at 1:01:15, provided insight into the thinking of those pushing the injections. Also the distinction between natural and modified RNA; and the platform and the payload it’s delivering.
Q&A began at 1:59:40. Then from 2:18:00 on we heard from:Continue reading October 1: Virginia Covid Management Public Forum
A name to mention when told…
- to Trust The ScienceTM or
- the COVID injections are safe.
After her second shot during an early clinical trial1Her two brothers also participated. So she and her consenting parents were clearly not ‘anti-vax’. Maddie became paraplegic.2Maddie was one of c. 1000 in her study group. Implication: there could be a 1-in-1000 chance of paraplegia with your second Pfizer mRNA COVID injection.
To this day her many injuries are downplayed and ignored by vaccine pushers (like the trial leaders, doctors, nurses, Public Health officials, governments and the dying
mainstream legacy media).
So, very few people know her story. Despite…Continue reading Maddie De Garay
- 1Her two brothers also participated. So she and her consenting parents were clearly not ‘anti-vax’.
- 2Maddie was one of c. 1000 in her study group. Implication: there could be a 1-in-1000 chance of paraplegia with your second Pfizer mRNA COVID injection.
If you have faith in Covid ‘vaccines’ – and those pushing them, then this piece by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is going to shake that faith.
Your faith in the media is likely to be rattled too. Because they’re ignoring all this – while unquestioningly giving voice to those who insist we “trust the science”.
Anyone trusting this kind of science, and its perpetrators, promoters and apologists needs to ask themselves some serious questions.
Brace yourself for:
- sneaky sophistry1subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
- more deaths in inoculated group
- more adverse events in inoculated group
- dodgy demographic design2e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented
- trial unblinded after just 2 months, so long-term safety can never be determined
- inappropriate endpoints chosen
- reduction in transmission of Covid never tested for
- not all participants were tested for Covid
- 80 participants were “lost to follow up”
- under powered trial for 12-15 year olds
- horrific outcomes for 12 year old participant Maddie de Garay misrepresented
- downplaying impact of myocarditis
- FDA want 50+ years to release >300,000 pages of data
- 84% of the authors have conflicts of interest
- CDC changed the definition of vaccine, accommodating these injections…
Here’s a video summary:
Here’s the PDF. Click the gear icon for Presentation (Fullscreen), Download and other options.
Thanks to Steve Kirsch for highlighting this stunning piece of work.
Well done Canadian Covid Care Alliance!
- 1subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
- 2e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented