Maddie de Garay

FDA to Vax Injured: We Got Nothin’

Mid-September: twenty people travelled from a dozen states to Washington D.C. to ask the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for help.

Two had lost sons, 16 and 34 years old, soon after their shots. Three were in wheelchairs, including a girl, 14. A surgeon, nurse practitioner, teacher, and most others can no longer work. Once healthy and fit, many had been eager to be vaccinated.

They got a one hour Zoom call to their hotel conference room with the top vaccine official in the United States – Peter Marks.

Seems what he said amounted to:

… “Thank you so much for sharing”
“We don’t have any secrets here,” he continued. “Our goal is to make the public understand the benefits and risks of these vaccines.”
Just how FDA is doing that was left unclear…
Mary Beth Pfeiffer

Steve Kirsch says they’re ignoring the risks

Like those

VAERS

picked up in his survey

Are the kids ok?

A heartbreaking new video released October 5th by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation shines a light on the growing number of children diagnosed with myocarditis after taking the Covid-19 vaccine.

Ethics Warning: contains adverts that imply

it’s morally ok for society to ask its children risk their well-being for others and
if those children are hurt by a medical product while taking that risk, the same profession whose product caused the damage can save them.¹

Tweeting about being in it got Dr. Peter McCullough Banned From Twitter.² Oddly, Twitter still haven’t suspended Dr. Pierre Kory or others for retweeting it.

the video | the press release

vacsafety.org

1
OpenVAERS.com shows not all are saved. Also the second ad ignores the life-threatening heart damage that is myocarditis; and the fact that before the jab rollout young people never experienced myocarditis or other issues at rates that warranted public-reassurance ads like this one. Or this one by the British Heart Foundation.
2
Here’s what’s left of his tweet. Here’s his account.

October 1: Virginia Covid Management Public Forum

Really, nothing says “Trust The Science” like asking for the data to be hidden for 75 years…
We’re now looking at the data – and it’s horrific.
Dr. Paul Marik (23:00)

Dr. Sheila Furey started the event by recapping the approach of Virginian authorities and highlighting their absence. She then introduced Dr. Paul Marik (16:10).

Dr. Paul Marik summarised the medical tyranny and the health catastrophe resulting from its lies. For example the 6.8% of the Covid-jabbed experiencing side-effects and trial participant Maddie de Garay‘s paralysis.

Dr. Robert Malone, introduced at 1:01:15, provided insight into the thinking of those pushing the injections. Also the distinction between natural and modified RNA; and the platform and the payload it’s delivering.

Q&A began at 1:59:40. Then from 2:18:00 on we heard from:

A name to mention when told…

to Trust The Science^TM or
the COVID injections are safe.

After her second shot during an early clinical trial¹ Maddie became paraplegic.²

To this day her many injuries are downplayed and ignored by vaccine pushers (like the trial leaders, doctors, nurses, Public Health officials, governments and the dying ~~mainstream~~ legacy media).

So, very few people know her story. Despite…

1
Her two brothers also participated. So she and her consenting parents were clearly not ‘anti-vax’.
2
Maddie was one of c. 1000 in her study group. Implication: there could be a 1-in-1000 chance of paraplegia with your second Pfizer mRNA COVID injection.

More Harm Than Good

If you have faith in Covid ‘vaccines’ – and those pushing them, then this piece by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is going to shake that faith.

Your faith in the media is likely to be rattled too. Because they’re ignoring all this – while unquestioningly giving voice to those who insist we “trust the science”.

Anyone trusting this kind of science, and its perpetrators, promoters and apologists needs to ask themselves some serious questions.

Brace yourself for:

sneaky sophistry¹
more deaths in inoculated group
more adverse events in inoculated group
dodgy demographic design²
trial unblinded after just 2 months, so long-term safety can never be determined
inappropriate endpoints chosen
reduction in transmission of Covid never tested for
not all participants were tested for Covid
80 participants were “lost to follow up”
under powered trial for 12-15 year olds
horrific outcomes for 12 year old participant Maddie de Garay misrepresented
downplaying impact of myocarditis
FDA want 50+ years to release >300,000 pages of data
84% of the authors have conflicts of interest
CDC changed the definition of vaccine, accommodating these injections…

Here’s a video summary:

Here’s the PDF. Click the gear icon for Presentation (Fullscreen), Download and other options.

Thanks to Steve Kirsch for highlighting this stunning piece of work.

Well done Canadian Covid Care Alliance!

1
subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
2
e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented