So I thought I’d share some of its recent history as recounted by Dr. Meryl Nass. It is a dark and disturbing story which…
“… requires people to take a huge leap in order to understand the world we live in. Many don’t have the fortitude to dissect their world view and rebuild it in accord with the facts that have spilled out over the last two years… It might require a stiff drink, or perhaps some chocolate. Whatever it takes, read on, as it might save your life or someone else’s….” Dr. Meryl Nass.
First came the Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine suppression
In 2020, I compiled a list of over 50 ways authorities and pharma companies in multiple countries stopped the use of the chloroquine drugs for COVID…
… here’s the kicker: the authorities knew all about chloroquine and other treatments for COVID before there was a COVID… because they had figured it out for the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2012 MERS epidemic, both caused by related coronaviruses. But they hushed it up.
Then Ivermectin appeared on the horizon
Continue reading 29th July is ‘World Ivermectin Day’
… some people knew it was likely to work in early 2020, because the French MedInCell company, supported by Bill Gates, was working on an injectable version of ivermectin for COVID, which could be patented. The company issued a press release about this on April 6, 2020 and an informational paper on April 23, 2020. There was a brief run on the veterinary drug at this time in the US… But there was not a lot of buzz and sales did not take off at that time…
Dr Pierre Kory recently published ‘The War on Ivermectin’ which documents his crusade to recommend a safe, inexpensive, generic medicine as the key to ending the pandemic.
In this interview recorded at the recent Better Way Conference in Bath, we explore personal attacks, professional setbacks, and nefarious efforts of the world’s major health agencies and medical journals to dismiss and deny the efficacy of various repurposed drugs, whilst looking forward to what can be done to restore open science over the next decade.Dan Astin-Gregory
- 1Frontline Covid Critical Care) Alliance
The study conducted in 399 participants [all unvaccinated1See press release here.] met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo groupMedinCell
Might this tempt Alex Berenson?Continue reading Proven again: ivermectin 72% effective in prevention of Covid-19 infection
(video starts at 6:20)
U.S. Senator Ron Johnson hears testimony from world-renowned experts in Public Health, Science, Medicine, Law, and Journalism in a public forum… held in the U.S. Senate’s Hart Building, on Capitol Hill. He will also hear testimony from victims of Covid vaccine injury. Speakers Include Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Robert Malone, ICAN Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq., OpenVAERS Founder, Liz Willner, Edward Dowd, Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Ryan Cole, Journalist, Del Bigtree, and more.The Highwire
Note: several contributors cite scientific papers and/or authors to support their statements. At times seemingly from memory.
Yet pro-mask/lockdown/vaccine politicians, journalists, public health personnel and others don’t seem to do that. How come?
A heartbreaking new video released October 5th by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation shines a light on the growing number of children diagnosed with myocarditis after taking the Covid-19 vaccine.
Ethics Warning: contains adverts that imply
- it’s morally ok for society to ask its children risk their well-being for others and
- if those children are hurt by a medical product while taking that risk, the same profession whose product caused the damage can save them.1OpenVAERS.com shows not all are saved. Also the second ad ignores the life-threatening heart damage that is myocarditis; and the fact that before the jab rollout young people never experienced myocarditis or other issues at rates that warranted public-reassurance ads like this one. Or this one by the British Heart Foundation.
Tweeting about being in it got Dr. Peter McCullough Banned From Twitter.2Here’s what’s left of his tweet. Here’s his account. Oddly, Twitter still haven’t suspended Dr. Pierre Kory or others for retweeting it.
- 1OpenVAERS.com shows not all are saved. Also the second ad ignores the life-threatening heart damage that is myocarditis; and the fact that before the jab rollout young people never experienced myocarditis or other issues at rates that warranted public-reassurance ads like this one. Or this one by the British Heart Foundation.
In under 14 minutes.
Of all the harmful misinformation spread over the past couple of years, one of the most disturbing false narratives was targeted at the Nobel Prize winning HUMAN medicine, Ivermectin. We produced this short film to correct the narrative and to reveal the motive behind the smear campaign against one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era.Mikki Willis. Father/Filmmaker.
So now he’s back on Twitter.
Alex Berenson joined the July 22nd VSRF weekly update to discuss his free speech lawsuit.
He also explained why he disagrees with (and was confronted by) Dr. Pierre Kory on the importance of ivermectin. Watch from 56:00 on. Great to see more debate!
Just how informed were / are you?
Did your Doctor, nurse or other COVID injection provider inform you of their own biases… and… all the deaths and neurological, vascular, reproductive and other injuries in the trials and post-release data?1Only published because of a Freedom Of Information Act request and a court deciding the FDA must release that data this year – not spread out over 55-75 years.
Dr. Kory also wrote about an informed consent discussion he had with a patient. He talked them through…Continue reading Informed Consent and The COVID-19 Vaccines
- 1Only published because of a Freedom Of Information Act request and a court deciding the FDA must release that data this year – not spread out over 55-75 years.
- 2Video opens with a snippet from the Canadian Covid Care Alliance “Stop The Shots” video
On March 30th The New England Journal of Medicine published the Brazilian TOGETHER Trial. The authors concluded “ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital”.
In May, Dr. Pierre Kory penned three articles describing this as fraud. Here are three highlights from his case.Continue reading Kory’s TOGETHER Trilogy
… who and/or what influenced Andrew Hill to change the conclusion of his paper on ivermectin – and why?
Meta-data suggests one Professor Andrew Owen might have been involved.Continue reading Andrew Hill and the Forces Against Ivermectin
- 1FLCCC Weekly Update (March 9, 2022)
In January and February last there were some important ‘wins’ for medical freedoms in the United States. In that some states were moving to let doctors doctor, and mainstream media carrying word that vaccinees get sick and/or die more frequently than their vaccine-free counterparts.
Pierre Kory outlined some of them.Continue reading Lawyers Helping to Let Doctors Be Doctors
One year on and there’s still something in the way of ivermectin.
Despite plenty of evidence it reduces hospitalisations and deaths – especially when combined in ‘protocols’ with other medications and/or supplements, Ivermectin is still not officially approved.
One of the main contributors to this situation is Dr. Andrew Hill’s paper of January 2021.
Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory are still calling out that paper…
… and offering forgiveness.
Will he retract it?
But if he did he’d save lives by enabling cheap, safe and effective treatment of Covid. He’d also spare more adults and children from the dangerous1Just how dangerous is becoming clear from insurance company data (see here, here and here), analyses of trial data (see here) and anecdotally (see here, here and here). Covid injections.
He’d also likely save us from totalitarianism.
The main reason the injections are being pushed on, and accepted and adopted by the public is that an emergency was declared – and that emergency could not have been declared if an effective intervention was known to exist and had been deployed.
Lockdowns and other (medically useless) measures like masks, distancing, testing and isolating healthy people couldn’t have been justified either.
Nor the passing of emergency laws that increase government and police infringement on our human rights, create two-tier societies and are help usher in a bio-security totalitarian way of life.2Here’s yet another example confirming this is not about health.
I wouldn’t like to be Andrew Hill.
But if I was, and I’d been offered forgiveness, I’d gladly accept it.
The day before the Letter To Andrew Hill was published Dr. Lawrie shared the background to it with Del Bigtree of The Highwire. You can watch that interview here.
- 2Here’s yet another example confirming this is not about health.