So now he’s back on Twitter.
Alex Berenson joined the July 22nd VSRF weekly update to discuss his free speech lawsuit.
He also explained why he disagrees with (and was confronted by) Dr. Pierre Kory on the importance of ivermectin. Watch from 56:00 on. Great to see more debate!
Original source of the Brook Jackson tweet about 16,136 vaccine-related disability lawsuits.
Just how informed were / are you?
Did your Doctor, nurse or other COVID injection provider inform you of their own biases… and… all the deaths and neurological, vascular, reproductive and other injuries in the trials and post-release data?1
Slides from this informative (!) video are here.2
Dr. Kory also wrote about an informed consent discussion he had with a patient. He talked them through…
Continue reading Informed Consent and The COVID-19 Vaccines
On March 30th The New England Journal of Medicine published the Brazilian TOGETHER Trial. The authors concluded “ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital”.
In May, Dr. Pierre Kory penned three articles describing this as fraud. Here are three highlights from his case.
Continue reading Kory’s TOGETHER Trilogy
Phil Harper, documentary film producer and author of The Digger Substack, joined Dr. Pierre Kory1 to discuss…
… who and/or what influenced Andrew Hill to change the conclusion of his paper on ivermectin – and why?
Meta-data suggests one Professor Andrew Owen might have been involved.
Continue reading Andrew Hill and the Forces Against Ivermectin
In January and February last there were some important ‘wins’ for medical freedoms in the United States. In that some states were moving to let doctors doctor, and mainstream media carrying word that vaccinees get sick and/or die more frequently than their vaccine-free counterparts.
Pierre Kory outlined some of them.
Continue reading Lawyers Helping to Let Doctors Be Doctors
One year on and there’s still something in the way of ivermectin.
Despite plenty of evidence it reduces hospitalisations and deaths – especially when combined in ‘protocols’ with other medications and/or supplements, Ivermectin is still not officially approved.
One of the main contributors to this situation is Dr. Andrew Hill’s paper of January 2021.
Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory are still calling out that paper…
… and offering forgiveness.
Will he retract it?
Because he knows he’ll be out of a job. After all we live in a world where going against public health diktats gets you branded a terrorist threat and truth telling gets you fired.
But if he did he’d save lives by enabling cheap, safe and effective treatment of Covid. He’d also spare more adults and children from the dangerous1 Covid injections.
He’d also likely save us from totalitarianism.
The main reason the injections are being pushed on, and accepted and adopted by the public is that an emergency was declared – and that emergency could not have been declared if an effective intervention was known to exist and had been deployed.
Lockdowns and other (medically useless) measures like masks, distancing, testing and isolating healthy people couldn’t have been justified either.
Nor the passing of emergency laws that increase government and police infringement on our human rights, create two-tier societies and are help usher in a bio-security totalitarian way of life.2
I wouldn’t like to be Andrew Hill.
But if I was, and I’d been offered forgiveness, I’d gladly accept it.
The day before the Letter To Andrew Hill was published Dr. Lawrie shared the background to it with Del Bigtree of The Highwire. You can watch that interview here.