Proven again: ivermectin 72% effective in prevention of Covid-19 infection

The study conducted in 399 participants [all unvaccinated1See press release here.] met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group 

MedinCell

Might this tempt Alex Berenson?

Continue reading Proven again: ivermectin 72% effective in prevention of Covid-19 infection

COVID-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work, and Possible Causes of Injuries

U.S. Senator Ron Johnson hears testimony from world-renowned experts in Public Health, Science, Medicine, Law, and Journalism in a public forum… held in the U.S. Senate’s Hart Building, on Capitol Hill. He will also hear testimony from victims of Covid vaccine injury. Speakers Include Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Robert Malone, ICAN Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq., OpenVAERS Founder, Liz Willner, Edward Dowd, Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Ryan Cole, Journalist, Del Bigtree, and more.

The Highwire

Note: several contributors cite scientific papers and/or authors to support their statements. At times seemingly from memory.

Yet pro-mask/lockdown/vaccine politicians, journalists, public health personnel and others don’t seem to do that. How come?


openVAERS.com | v-safe data | react19.org

Are the kids ok?

A heartbreaking new video released October 5th by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation shines a light on the growing number of children diagnosed with myocarditis after taking the Covid-19 vaccine.

Ethics Warning: contains adverts that imply

  • it’s morally ok for society to ask its children risk their well-being for others and
  • if those children are hurt by a medical product while taking that risk, the same profession whose product caused the damage can save them.1OpenVAERS.com shows not all are saved. Also the second ad ignores the life-threatening heart damage that is myocarditis; and the fact that before the jab rollout young people never experienced myocarditis or other issues at rates that warranted public-reassurance ads like this one. Or this one by the British Heart Foundation.

Tweeting about being in it got Dr. Peter McCullough Banned From Twitter.2Here’s what’s left of his tweet. Here’s his account. Oddly, Twitter still haven’t suspended Dr. Pierre Kory or others for retweeting it.

the video | the press release


vacsafety.org

  • 1
    OpenVAERS.com shows not all are saved. Also the second ad ignores the life-threatening heart damage that is myocarditis; and the fact that before the jab rollout young people never experienced myocarditis or other issues at rates that warranted public-reassurance ads like this one. Or this one by the British Heart Foundation.
  • 2
    Here’s what’s left of his tweet. Here’s his account.

The Truth About Ivermectin

In under 14 minutes.

Of all the harmful misinformation spread over the past couple of years, one of the most disturbing false narratives was targeted at the Nobel Prize winning HUMAN medicine, Ivermectin. We produced this short film to correct the narrative and to reveal the motive behind the smear campaign against one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era.

Mikki Willis. Father/Filmmaker.

The ‘pandemic’s wrongest man’ sued.

So now he’s back on Twitter.

Alex Berenson joined the July 22nd VSRF weekly update to discuss his free speech lawsuit.

He also explained why he disagrees with (and was confronted by) Dr. Pierre Kory on the importance of ivermectin. Watch from 56:00 on. Great to see more debate!

Original source of the Brook Jackson tweet about 16,136 vaccine-related disability lawsuits.

Informed Consent and The COVID-19 Vaccines

Just how informed were / are you?

Did your Doctor, nurse or other COVID injection provider inform you of their own biases… and… all the deaths and neurological, vascular, reproductive and other injuries in the trials and post-release data?1Only published because of a Freedom Of Information Act request and a court deciding the FDA must release that data this year – not spread out over 55-75 years.

Slides from this informative (!) video are here.2Video opens with a snippet from the Canadian Covid Care Alliance “Stop The Shots” video

Dr. Kory also wrote about an informed consent discussion he had with a patient. He talked them through…

Continue reading Informed Consent and The COVID-19 Vaccines
  • 1
    Only published because of a Freedom Of Information Act request and a court deciding the FDA must release that data this year – not spread out over 55-75 years.
  • 2
    Video opens with a snippet from the Canadian Covid Care Alliance “Stop The Shots” video

Kory’s TOGETHER Trilogy

On March 30th The New England Journal of Medicine published the Brazilian TOGETHER Trial. The authors concluded “ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital”.

In May, Dr. Pierre Kory penned three articles describing this as fraud. Here are three highlights from his case.

Continue reading Kory’s TOGETHER Trilogy

Andrew Hill and the Forces Against Ivermectin

Phil Harper, documentary film producer and author of The Digger Substack, joined Dr. Pierre Kory1FLCCC Weekly Update (March 9, 2022) to discuss…

… who and/or what influenced Andrew Hill to change the conclusion of his paper on ivermectin – and why?

Meta-data suggests one Professor Andrew Owen might have been involved.

Continue reading Andrew Hill and the Forces Against Ivermectin
  • 1
    FLCCC Weekly Update (March 9, 2022)

Lawyers Helping to Let Doctors Be Doctors

In January and February last there were some important ‘wins’ for medical freedoms in the United States. In that some states were moving to let doctors doctor, and mainstream media carrying word that vaccinees get sick and/or die more frequently than their vaccine-free counterparts.

Pierre Kory outlined some of them.

Continue reading Lawyers Helping to Let Doctors Be Doctors

A Letter to Andrew Hill

One year on and there’s still something in the way of ivermectin.

Despite plenty of evidence it reduces hospitalisations and deaths – especially when combined in ‘protocols’ with other medications and/or supplements, Ivermectin is still not officially approved.

One of the main contributors to this situation is Dr. Andrew Hill’s paper of January 2021.

Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory are still calling out that paper…

… and offering forgiveness.

Will he retract it?

Unlikely.

Because he knows he’ll be out of a job. After all we live in a world where going against public health diktats gets you branded a terrorist threat and truth telling gets you fired.

But if he did he’d save lives by enabling cheap, safe and effective treatment of Covid. He’d also spare more adults and children from the dangerous1Just how dangerous is becoming clear from insurance company data (see here, here and here), analyses of trial data (see here) and anecdotally (see here, here and here). Covid injections.

He’d also likely save us from totalitarianism.

How so?

The main reason the injections are being pushed on, and accepted and adopted by the public is that an emergency was declared – and that emergency could not have been declared if an effective intervention was known to exist and had been deployed.

Lockdowns and other (medically useless) measures like masks, distancing, testing and isolating healthy people couldn’t have been justified either.

Nor the passing of emergency laws that increase government and police infringement on our human rights, create two-tier societies and are help usher in a bio-security totalitarian way of life.2Here’s yet another example confirming this is not about health.

I wouldn’t like to be Andrew Hill.

But if I was, and I’d been offered forgiveness, I’d gladly accept it.

The day before the Letter To Andrew Hill was published Dr. Lawrie shared the background to it with Del Bigtree of The Highwire. You can watch that interview here.

  • 1
    Just how dangerous is becoming clear from insurance company data (see here, here and here), analyses of trial data (see here) and anecdotally (see here, here and here).
  • 2
    Here’s yet another example confirming this is not about health.