Five Kiwis on their awakening, experiences of and responses to the COVID crazy.
We speak to a coalition of New Zealander voices leading the growing minority of dissidents speaking up against their government’s Covid mandate tyranny. First, unvaccinated filmmaking couple Leonie May and Jared Connon join us. Then we speak to Kirsten Murfitt, Founding Solicitor NZLSOS lobbying to defend civil liberties in New Zealand, and Dr Matt Shelton who is a GP & Founder of NZLSOS.1Possible typo? Nawaz may have meant NZDSOS: New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science Finally we wrap up the conversation with Marama Fox, an indigenous Maori representative and former co-leader of the Maori party.
Maria Gutschi tells Mathew Crawford and Liam Sturgess
… this was one of the more educational discussions for me during the pandemic. I am still learning about the regulatory processes, and being shocked by new twists and turns. It’s as if the drug distributors always had a thousand tricks at their disposal, and decided to use them all at once for the shock and awe many of us intuitively felt even if we could not decipher all of the many details.
You learn about another person’s integrity the moment you see them put in a position to stand up to their peers. Drs. Brian Tyson and Mary Talley Bowden have shown what they are made of, despite threats to their medical licenses and careers. Disturbingly, medical boards want to stop them from practicing medicine for the crime of treating patients with antiviral and antibiotic medication, vitamins, and whatever else they as diagnosticians felt could help their patients. Between the pair, they and their staff have treated on the order of 20,000 patients with none dying if treated early, and a single-digit number passing otherwise.
I suggested [on Doctors.net – only accessible by UK registered doctors] that, perhaps it would be better to engage Dr Malhotra in debate, rather than attacking him as a charlatan. At which point I was attacked…
I have discussed vaccination at my local sports club. At which point, almost everyone takes on that silent, arms crossed look, if you mention you have some concerns about vaccines.
They don’t debate the issue, because they can’t, because they don’t know anything other than what they have been told by mainstream media. But it is clear that some of them now see me as a bloody anti-vaxxer. Even if I say nothing more than, ‘I have some concerns.’
Yes, to ask for debate, or to dare express some concerns, is to be labelled an anti-vaxxer.
… wide range of topics including [masks,] censorship of doctors, AB2098 (the California doctor censorship bill that was just signed into law), clinical practice guidelines, why her peers are retiring in large numbers, MIS-C1“Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children” rates in children, whether she has been able to red-pill anyone (short answer is no; she talked to 30 of her peers and red-pilled 0), are GMO foods safe or not, how can doctors be looking the other way while we give our kids unsafe drugs, and more.
My friends … asked me incredulously, “Why would the medical community silence doctors who are trying to save lives?”
They didn’t believe my answer.
So I wanted to interview a doctor who is very highly respected and who is not an “anti-vaxxer” to explain it to them…
He regrets not having done his homework and trusting others when he took the shot. It was only after he looked at the data directly himself, he said the data was crystal clear…
[Dr.] Meryl Nass, like Dr. Marik, has been punished for speaking out.
Meryl Nass explains why most doctors did not speak out against the COVID-19 treatment protocol or even bother to look at the data: they trust the system…
“if [Fauci] creates a standard and that is the standard and you vary from it, if anything happens to your patient, you are liable to the charge of malpractice. If you use his standard and all the patients die, you can’t be sued because that’s the standard of care.”
Dr. Steve James, Dr. Tina Peers, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. David Cartland, Patrick Holford, Dr. Ros Jones, Dr. Anna Forbes, Dr. Peter Chan, Dr. Sarah Myhill, Dr. Julia Wilkens, Dr. Stephan Becker, Dr Rob Verkerk, Dr Mohammad Adil and others will discuss the future of the NHS,1National Health Service, UK health consequences of the C-19 chapter, medical ethics, and how to empower excellent health for all.
UK cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra and public health professional Abir Ballan MPH1Master’s in Public Health spoke with Maajid Nawaz on the corruption and parasitic practises of the global pharmaceutical industry.
Ballan’s revelations about Case Fatality Rates, PCR cycles, WHO funders and more begin at 51:00.
Chaired by Senator Malcolm Roberts, the inquiry heard shocking and revealing evidence concerning breaches of the doctor-patient relationship and the regulatory capture of Australia’s health and drug regulators.
Here is Dr. Philip Altman’s first of two testimonies on the day:
UK GP Dr. Sam White was sanctioned by the General Medical Council for speaking out against the COVID narrative. But the High Court ruled the GMC were violating his human rights.
July 3rd he talked with Maajid Nawaz about his initial questions, resignation, suspension, kangaroo courts, evidence submitted to the police – and Integrative / Functional Medicine as a better form of health care.
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.