The Truth About Ivermectin

In under 14 minutes.

Of all the harmful misinformation spread over the past couple of years, one of the most disturbing false narratives was targeted at the Nobel Prize winning HUMAN medicine, Ivermectin. We produced this short film to correct the narrative and to reveal the motive behind the smear campaign against one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era.

Mikki Willis. Father/Filmmaker.

Informed Consent and The COVID-19 Vaccines

Just how informed were / are you?

Did your Doctor, nurse or other COVID injection provider inform you of their own biases… and… all the deaths and neurological, vascular, reproductive and other injuries in the trials and post-release data?1Only published because of a Freedom Of Information Act request and a court deciding the FDA must release that data this year – not spread out over 55-75 years.

Slides from this informative (!) video are here.2Video opens with a snippet from the Canadian Covid Care Alliance “Stop The Shots” video

Dr. Kory also wrote about an informed consent discussion he had with a patient. He talked them through…

Continue reading Informed Consent and The COVID-19 Vaccines
  • 1
    Only published because of a Freedom Of Information Act request and a court deciding the FDA must release that data this year – not spread out over 55-75 years.
  • 2
    Video opens with a snippet from the Canadian Covid Care Alliance “Stop The Shots” video

A Letter to Andrew Hill

One year on and there’s still something in the way of ivermectin.

Despite plenty of evidence it reduces hospitalisations and deaths – especially when combined in ‘protocols’ with other medications and/or supplements, Ivermectin is still not officially approved.

One of the main contributors to this situation is Dr. Andrew Hill’s paper of January 2021.

Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory are still calling out that paper…

… and offering forgiveness.

Will he retract it?

Unlikely.

Because he knows he’ll be out of a job. After all we live in a world where going against public health diktats gets you branded a terrorist threat and truth telling gets you fired.

But if he did he’d save lives by enabling cheap, safe and effective treatment of Covid. He’d also spare more adults and children from the dangerous1Just how dangerous is becoming clear from insurance company data (see here, here and here), analyses of trial data (see here) and anecdotally (see here, here and here). Covid injections.

He’d also likely save us from totalitarianism.

How so?

The main reason the injections are being pushed on, and accepted and adopted by the public is that an emergency was declared – and that emergency could not have been declared if an effective intervention was known to exist and had been deployed.

Lockdowns and other (medically useless) measures like masks, distancing, testing and isolating healthy people couldn’t have been justified either.

Nor the passing of emergency laws that increase government and police infringement on our human rights, create two-tier societies and are help usher in a bio-security totalitarian way of life.2Here’s yet another example confirming this is not about health.

I wouldn’t like to be Andrew Hill.

But if I was, and I’d been offered forgiveness, I’d gladly accept it.

The day before the Letter To Andrew Hill was published Dr. Lawrie shared the background to it with Del Bigtree of The Highwire. You can watch that interview here.

  • 1
    Just how dangerous is becoming clear from insurance company data (see here, here and here), analyses of trial data (see here) and anecdotally (see here, here and here).
  • 2
    Here’s yet another example confirming this is not about health.