My friends … asked me incredulously, “Why would the medical community silence doctors who are trying to save lives?”
They didn’t believe my answer.
So I wanted to interview a doctor who is very highly respected and who is not an “anti-vaxxer” to explain it to them…
He regrets not having done his homework and trusting others when he took the shot. It was only after he looked at the data directly himself, he said the data was crystal clear…
[Dr.] Meryl Nass, like Dr. Marik, has been punished for speaking out.
Meryl Nass explains why most doctors did not speak out against the COVID-19 treatment protocol or even bother to look at the data: they trust the system…
“if [Fauci] creates a standard and that is the standard and you vary from it, if anything happens to your patient, you are liable to the charge of malpractice. If you use his standard and all the patients die, you can’t be sued because that’s the standard of care.”
Authorized based on findings in just a few more than 8 mice (they won’t tell us the exact number) – none of which were autopsied afterward.1I’ve since discovered this Igor Chudov post indicating ten mice were involved. All of whom developed Covid by the way.
That’s how The ScienceTM is done now. As anticipated.2See here and here.
Meryl Nass, MD and Toby Rogers, Ph.D. watched last week’s 8-hour CDC meeting live. Then, with Dr. Brian Booker, they talked the Friday Roundtable‘3Hosted for the Children’s Health Defense by Polly Tommey and Aimee Villella-Mcbride through the:
authorisation process (brace yourself)
implications for national security and airline safety
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.