VAERS = Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System1“… put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% (read more about underreporting in VAERS) of vaccine injuries. OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data available for download at vaers.hhs.gov” OpenVAERS.com | AE = Adverse Events
Using a single keyword: ‘sudden’, I was able to pull out 13,752 adverse event reports and of these, 2,052 died.
80% of the individuals who submitted reports of sudden adverse events had no current illnesses at the time of their injection. 77% of individuals who died with an associated sudden onset adverse event had no current illnesses at the time of injection. In some cases, it was actually noted that the person was as healthy as a horse at the time of injection…
The timeframes between injection and adverse events look like this:
And for the subset of people of died:
…
The most reported adverse event associated with ‘sudden’ … is Arthralgia (joint pain) and for death, is Sudden death… interesting that in the top 10 in general, Sudden hearing loss comes up and Dizziness as well…
Dec 2, 2022: You will ‘rent’ everything and be happy!
… do you want the government dictating every aspect of your life?
… Net zero is not about saving the planet. Net zero is about taking control of the food and the energy. And finding a way to turn that into a currency…
… It cannot happen without digital ID. Digital ID is the last gate that we can rebel at…
… mid-way through [he] revealed that a whistleblower from a very reliable source had told him that the British Heart Foundation (BHF) had data which was being covered up. According to Mr. Bridgen, the BHF are covering up information about mRNA vaccines causing heart inflammation. They are doing this through fear of losing funding from the pharmaceutical industry. So much so that a prominent leader within the organisation has sent out non-disclosure agreements to his research team preventing them from speaking out.1Nothing says “trust the science” quite like hiding the data! (Sarcasm).
Dr Faan Oosthuizen, a veteran GP, distressed by C19 injection injuries he is seeing, sent his notice letter, with the timeframe for the minister to respond being today, 14 December 2022. It is unlikely that the [health] minister… will do anything to protect the health and lives of our children.
If there is no cease and desist, based on the injuries conscientious health care workers see, and reports to the independent adverse effects reporting system SA VAERS show – a committed group, including Dr Oosthuizen, Dr EV Rapiti, scientist Fahrie Hassan, I, lawyer Riekie Erasmus and Advocate Sabelo Sibanda and others, will launch an urgent application to defend the health, lives and rights of South African residents…
The letter to the health minister Dr Joe Phaahla reads… [click here]
I must highlight that the under reporting factor (URF) in a country with South Africa’s socio-economic conditions will be far higher than other countries. In other words, adverse effects reports must be multiplied by a factor of far higher than 31 (average URF calculated by Dr Jessica Rose).
The [‘Canaadian crash study’] authors are not mincing words: they found that UNvaccinated people are MORE likely to have car crashes. Based on this statistical finding, they urge people to vaccinate to avoid car crashes!
But…
Guess who is more likely to get into a car crash? That’s right, the person who drives to work daily, as opposed to a remote worker.
And…
The Unvaccinated Could not Take Trains or Fly in Canada
So they had to drive more.
Oh, one more thing…
Turns out that people over 65, who do NOT drive to work, are the ONLY group where vaccination leads to a slightly higher chance of car crashes for the vaccinated (without reaching statistical significance).
This outcome is the OPPOSITE of what happened to employed people:
So we can see that the conclusion that “unvaccinated people are more likely to be hurt in crashes” is explained by the fact that “essential workers” who drive to work were the ones choosing not to get vaccinated!
So… It is not the COVID vaccine that reduces the chances of having a crash. It is a fact that staying home with warm coffee and a laptop is safer than commuting to work or driving a truck. The effect does NOT exist in old people who do not work.
U.S. Senator Ron Johnson hears testimony from world-renowned experts in Public Health, Science, Medicine, Law, and Journalism in a public forum… held in the U.S. Senate’s Hart Building, on Capitol Hill. He will also hear testimony from victims of Covid vaccine injury. Speakers Include Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Robert Malone, ICAN Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq., OpenVAERS Founder, Liz Willner, Edward Dowd, Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Ryan Cole, Journalist, Del Bigtree, and more.
… the general public and doctors don’t know what’s really happening; and they don’t even know that they don’t know.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra (1:37:00)
Nov 29, Dallas, Texas Drs. McCullough and Malhotra spoke about:
manipulated virus
military style approach
deceptive use of science and data.1E.g. Relative Risk vs Absolute Risk.
regulatory, media and political capture
censorship and being attacked
Pfizer and Moderna’s original trials showed greater risk of harm from injection than of catching COVID…
… I was cautious during the early months of the vaccine campaign but as the deaths accrued shortly after injection I could not remain silent by the late winter of 2021. Dr. Malhotra in his presentation painfully describes his journey of emotional distraught, losing his father and last remaining first-degree family member, and then his relentless pursuit of the truth culminating in the publication of a pair of analyses concluding all COVID-19 vaccinations are not sufficiently safe nor effective to remain in use today… Together we have hundreds of published scientific reports and opinions. We have delivered thousands of lectures and speeches. We both have suffered professional retaliation for telling the truth. We are not wrong about these conclusions.
A better summary than mine of the Heidelberg autopsy study.
Our authorities claim that “myocarditis does not cause deaths” for only one reason: they refused to autopsy vaccine victims. As soon as autopsies of a representative sample of “sudden deaths” were finally done, as in the above Heidelberg study, it turned out that 20% of sudden deaths were myocarditis-related.
Here’s the list of “causes of death” for most of these subjects. Thanks to Brian Mowrey for pointing it out. A lot of them deserve their own substack post!!! Look at sudden-onset pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, thrombi etc…
Here, we describe the cardiac autopsy findings in five persons who have died unexpectedly within seven days following anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination, with vaccine-induced myocardial inflammation representing the likely or possible cause of death. Our findings establish the histological phenotype of lethal vaccination-associated myocarditis.
This a small study: 5 out of 25 people who died unexpectedly within 20 days of a COVID-19 injection. But hard to dismiss as coincidental given the mounting evidence1e.g this, this, this, all this and that the authors reported:
During the last 20 years of autopsy service at Heidelberg University Hospital we did not observe comparable myocardial inflammatory infiltration. This was validated by histological re-evaluation of age- and sex-matched cohorts from three independent periods, which did not reveal a single case showing a comparable cardiac pathology….
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
