The Fact-Checker Scam

… the Government and mainstream media fact-chechers actually have no problem with misinformation as long as it aligns with the adopted political agenda.

Jeremey R. Hammond

Starting with his own Linkedin experience 1Suspended for 1) resharing an old article on the 2009 Iranian Presidential election 2), correcting misinformation about ivermectin research 3), showing that the CDC’s own data falsified their claim that vaccine-induced immunity was superior to natural immunity. Jeremy Hammond joined Tom Woods to discuss the problem of mainstream “fact checkers” enforcing the establishment narrative.

He gave numerous examples of truthful information being suppressed including:

Continue reading The Fact-Checker Scam
  • 1
    Suspended for 1) resharing an old article on the 2009 Iranian Presidential election 2), correcting misinformation about ivermectin research 3), showing that the CDC’s own data falsified their claim that vaccine-induced immunity was superior to natural immunity.

More mask mischief

The ScienceTM just can’t help itself. Despite the glaringly obvious.

There is a new systematic review of 1732 mask studies to determine whether masks work. It is on a preprint server meaning it is not peer-reviewed.

Almost all of the 1732 potential studies were eliminated so they only looked at 13 studies with a total of 243 COVID infections between the two groups.

One of the 13 studies that was not eliminated was done in 2004 which is impressive since SARS-CoV-2 didn’t exist at the time.

From that, they conclude that masks provide nearly a 90% risk reduction of getting infected.

That is preposterous.

Steve Kirsch

More on masks: Tom Woods | Ian Miller1He’s done several mask articles | Swiss Policy Research2Direct link to aerosol demo video.

Still trust mask science?

Then try the Covid Charts Quiz.

Yes, the charts are pre-injections, so it is dated. But if they are effective you should still be able to spot the influence of masks (and lockdowns).

Shouldn’t you?

Fact Check: Covid as a Leading Cause of Death in Children

Pro-ivermectin? No amount of favourable peer-reviewed double-blind, randomized controlled trials will satisfy authorities.

Pro-vaccine? Cite an obviously misleading pre-print1i.e. not yet peer-reviewed and your preferred way of worsening2Geert Vanden Bossche has warned about this several times. Check out 01:00 to 14:50 of The Highwire –Episode 273: Sacrificing Science. ending the pandemic will be endorsed.

Trust The ScienceTM

Even if it can be torn apart in minutes.

Continue reading Fact Check: Covid as a Leading Cause of Death in Children
  • 1
    i.e. not yet peer-reviewed
  • 2
    Geert Vanden Bossche has warned about this several times. Check out 01:00 to 14:50 of The Highwire –Episode 273: Sacrificing Science.

Covid Charts Quiz

Can you tell the difference between places which applied measures and those which didn’t – or which lifted them?

The measures were so dramatic, and we were constantly told they were effective, so it should be easy, right?

CovidChartsQuiz.com