Tom Woods – Oisín Page

The Vaccine Injured: Ignore Them

Seems to be the approach worldwide

Josh Stylman, executive producer¹ of the film Anecdotals, joins me to discuss the fate of the vaccine injured in the age of Covid. I rank this one in the top ten of all 2,257 episodes.
Tom Woods

Mentioned: Joshua’s substack article

AnecdotalsMovie.com

Also on: Odysee | Rumble

1
Daily Clout recently featured an interview with both Director Jennifer Sharp and Executive Director Josh Stylman.

Anecdotals Movie

In March 2021, after receiving my Pfizer shot, I couldn’t feel the left side of my face for a month. Eighteen months later, electric shocks and muscle weakness continue. Unable to receive the 2nd dose, I am amongst a group of partially-vaccinated people who have been outcast from many aspects of society with no empathy. We’ve been censored and told it’s unethical to talk about our stories because we are just anecdotes.

/p>

This movie provides a glimpse into the lives of the Anecdotals–those of us whose lives have been changed drastically by taking the vaccine. It also reflects on the division and politics that prevents us from getting much needed care. Anecdotals is a personal journey that focuses on questions, not answers, and people, not politics.
AnecdotalsMovie.com

Interviews

Dec 14: film Director Jennifer Sharp and Executive Producer Josh Stylman spoke with Etana Hecht of DailyClout.io about making the movie.f]Or watch on Rumble[/f]

Dec 22: Tom Woods interviewed Executive Producer Josh Stylman.¹

AnecdotalsMovie.com

Watch on: Odysee | Rumble | YouTube

Donate

1
Mentioned: Joshua’s substack article

Journalism is therapy

It’s not so much about Truth any more.

John Ziegler, host of With the Benefit of Hindsight… Podcast, recently talked with Tom Woods about the state of journalism – and his new podcast series The Death Of Journalism with fellow truth crusader and former sports TV anchor, Liz Habib.

He mentions two episodes. Here they are.

Interesting to recall the timeline and cascade of events. Including a mention of golfer Rory McIlroy.

COVID: cool for school?

The treatment of pupils during the COVID debacle has been a painful lesson on the problems of state-backed, centralised schooling.

Cool outcome: demand for educational choice and freedom is growing.

Could this US initiative work elsewhere?

Crude synopsis: fund the student – not the system, and let the student / family direct that funding to their preferred school.

Corey DeAngelis | EducationFreedomPledge.com | TomWoods.com | AmericanFederationForChildrem.org |

What happened in the mid-terms?

Despite expectations and hopes there wasn’t a ‘red wave’ in the USA elections. So the current political, judicial, economic, medical, educational etc direction of travel are unlikely to change much.

Dan McCarthy shared his analysis with Tom Woods .

But if the elected keep infringing human rights and making things worse… does their party affiliation really matter?

By their fruits ye shall know them.

“A clear winner is emerging” by JermWarfare.com

The Fact-Checker Scam

… the Government and mainstream media fact-chechers actually have no problem with misinformation as long as it aligns with the adopted political agenda.
Jeremey R. Hammond

Starting with his own Linkedin experience ¹ Jeremy Hammond joined Tom Woods to discuss the problem of mainstream “fact checkers” enforcing the establishment narrative.

He gave numerous examples of truthful information being suppressed including:

1
Suspended for 1) resharing an old article on the 2009 Iranian Presidential election 2), correcting misinformation about ivermectin research 3), showing that the CDC’s own data falsified their claim that vaccine-induced immunity was superior to natural immunity.

More mask mischief

The Science^TM just can’t help itself. Despite the glaringly obvious.

There is a new systematic review of 1732 mask studies to determine whether masks work. It is on a preprint server meaning it is not peer-reviewed.
Almost all of the 1732 potential studies were eliminated so they only looked at 13 studies with a total of 243 COVID infections between the two groups.
One of the 13 studies that was not eliminated was done in 2004 which is impressive since SARS-CoV-2 didn’t exist at the time.
From that, they conclude that masks provide nearly a 90% risk reduction of getting infected.
That is preposterous.
Steve Kirsch

More on masks: Tom Woods | Ian Miller¹ | Swiss Policy Research²

Still trust mask science?

Then try the Covid Charts Quiz.

Yes, the charts are pre-injections, so it is dated. But if they are effective you should still be able to spot the influence of masks (and lockdowns).

Shouldn’t you?

1
He’s done several mask articles
2
Direct link to aerosol demo video.

Fact Check: Covid as a Leading Cause of Death in Children

Pro-ivermectin? No amount of favourable peer-reviewed double-blind, randomized controlled trials will satisfy authorities.

Pro-vaccine? Cite an obviously misleading pre-print¹ and your preferred way of ~~worsening~~² ending the pandemic will be endorsed.

Trust The Science^TM

Even if it can be torn apart in minutes.

1
i.e. not yet peer-reviewed
2
Geert Vanden Bossche has warned about this several times. Check out 01:00 to 14:50 of The Highwire –Episode 273: Sacrificing Science.

Covid Charts Quiz

Can you tell the difference between places which applied measures and those which didn’t – or which lifted them?

The measures were so dramatic, and we were constantly told they were effective, so it should be easy, right?

CovidChartsQuiz.com