In his latest, stats guy Joel Smalley highlights yet another ‘black swan’ – and reminds us of two others he’s previously covered: The Amish and Palau.
This little island off the coast of the UK managed to dodge the deadliest pandemic since the “Spanish flu” completely…
Curiously though, even though allegedly representing more than 1 in 5 deaths at its peak in April 2020, COVID didn’t make a blind bit of difference to the island’s overall mortality, not even in that month…
Even more curiously, Isle of Man’s COVID death toll itself was almost four times higher after the roll out of the “vaccine” that was supposed to save everyone from a COVID death – mysteriously, only really taking off, rather unseasonably, in the middle of summer 2021, more than a year after this deadly epidemic first emerged…
Thousands of young people, including children and babies are affected
According to information released as a result of a freedom of information request (because the public health authorities wouldn’t publish it otherwise)1, there has been an explosion of serious cardiac episodes in Australia since April 2021…
… disproportionally affecting young people, with emergency department presentations for 10 to 29 year olds almost doubling over the period March 2021 to Feb 2022…
You don’t want to die prematurely, do you? You don’t want your friends and family to either? So, why are you ignoring the signals?
Some important things have happened this week.
One of the most important was the suspension of MP Andrew Bridgen. It’s important because, like many of us truthers over the last couple of years, he has simply become the latest victim of censorship…
… The other important thing is el gato publicly humiliating the ONS.1Office for National Statistics, UK. He has diligently re-analysed their “vaccine effectiveness” data to show that the vaccinated were already dying proportionally more than the unvaccinated up to May last year when the ONS callously stopped reporting…
… yet, when presented with the irrefutable evidence that, in the six months after the mass injection of the population with an experimental medical treatment, the excess mortality signal is at least as high as when the deadly pathogen emerged, the government and media don’t even so much as want to talk about it but they have to shut up anyone else who dares to try.
The data is only in for the first half of season 2022-23 but at 90% higher than the 2018-19 lowest early season, it’s not looking too good either, is it?
…
I am deeply saddened that the majority of people are still completely unaware of the situation we face.
I am even more saddened by the continued apathy of those who are aware but still choose to do nothing about it.
But we must persist. For the sake of our children.
I might be wrong. Andrew might be wrong. But we sure as hell won’t ever find out what’s right if we muzzle those who ask questions….
They’re at it again. Planning a FAKE pandemic. Enabled by untrustworthy PCR.
A few remarks:
1. It’s FAKE. It’s immunologically impossible to have a pandemic of a severe respiratory illness. If you accept the disease model they’re using, then the more severe the illness, the more quickly the infected person, if they’re susceptible, becomes symptomatic. It’s only then that the person might transmit to other susceptible person, but by then, they’re sick & at home. Not mixing with others. Chain terminated. Drops R nought.2“R” is the statistical ‘rate of spread’.. R=1 means 1 person infects 1 person who infects 1 person etc. If R=2 then 1 person infects 2 who infect 2 more etc. R=0 means no spread.
By contrast, common cold type illnesses can whizz around the world & nobody cares.
Which in part explains why we’ve never had a pandemic of a severe respiratory illness.
Covid was faked at worst (my opinion, supported by the deaths epidemiology) & at very least exaggerated.
The 1918-19 “Spanish Flu” was also grossly exaggerated. The numbers who perished were far fewer than are now claimed. Contemporaneous documents just a few years later don’t even mention it. Not consistent with “the worst pandemic since medieval times”.
2. I know of no conceivable respiratory pathogen that preferentially makes “young people” ill, not the frail elderly. Sure, there are some illnesses that are particularly cruel on tiny babies and frail tots. Young adults are like cockroaches where it comes to respiratory illnesses. I don’t believe the frail elderly could be spared & there are ALWAYS way more frail in the elderly population than in the young & fit (immunocompetent) population.
“R” is the statistical ‘rate of spread’.. R=1 means 1 person infects 1 person who infects 1 person etc. If R=2 then 1 person infects 2 who infect 2 more etc. R=0 means no spread.
In June 2021, Dr Tess Lawrie wrote to Dr. June Raine, the Chief Executive of the MHRA highlighting the high number of vaccine adverse event reports on the Yellow Card1“The Yellow Card System is an early warning system in the UK where doctors and individuals can report side effects that they suspect correspond with a medicine they have received. It is a vital way of monitoring the safety of medicines and can also identify any issues that have not yet been detected.” system between 4th January 2021 and 26th May 2021. A reply was received from Dr. Raine on 22nd July 2021. In the letter, she expressed the opinion that “some events may have happened coincidentally, regardless of vaccination”.
On 9th August 2021, Tess sent a follow up and included some lengthy analysis I had done on all-cause mortality and sent to my local MP, Julie Marson. In total, 58 pages of evidence demonstrating that the Safe and Effective™ mRNA therapy was anything but.
Crickets.
Since our early warning about the obvious warning signal in the early warning system, many, many thousands more people have died as a result of the mRNA product.
“The Yellow Card System is an early warning system in the UK where doctors and individuals can report side effects that they suspect correspond with a medicine they have received. It is a vital way of monitoring the safety of medicines and can also identify any issues that have not yet been detected.”
It’s just another one of a few hundred similar statistical coincidences.
… Same time period, same state, same cohort. Twice as many excess deaths after the introduction of a novel, still experimental medical intervention.
… even more weird is that the weekly excess deaths only really spike in mid-July, almost exactly 5 months after the experiment begins and follow a remarkably similar distribution pattern
(Note: He didn’t remark on it but Smalley’s Texas chart also shows the same ‘trending upwards and not returning to baseline’ pattern that has been highlighted by others).
Steve Kirsch cites several others who have also found time-lag patterns (in both US and UK data).
Official Australian stats1Archive versions of that page here and here. show 17.1% more deaths than expected in 2021-2022. Here’s their main graph – to which I’ve added southern hemisphere seasons.
Initially the ‘with and without Covid’ approach distracted from the key metric: all-cause deaths (red line).
But, once focused I began comparing the red line to the baseline range (light blue zone)… and recalled something my statistics lecturer in university said: the height of the curve is not as important as the total area under it.
So I found myself wondering:
why did deaths in this particular Australian summer so greatly exceed
the normal summer range and
also that of the previous winter?2The chart’s language and design suggests these summer deaths are Covid related. But since when did respiratory viruses do more harm in summer than winter?!
why are deaths this current winter so much higher than in the previous, less-vaccinated winter?!
why are Australian all-cause deaths trending upwards and not returning to normal seasonal ranges – just like we see in:
The chart’s language and design suggests these summer deaths are Covid related. But since when did respiratory viruses do more harm in summer than winter?!
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.