The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects

Dr. Paul Alexander reminds us of the New York Times piece from February.

The headline message might cause some to question the CDC’s integrity. Helpful from a freedom lovers point of view.

Not helpful is that the shared snippet implies better control of the virus could be achieved and more lives saved, if we had more info. Two unfortunate things there.

Continue reading The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects

Covid Coincidence

Coincidence theorists1Those who see coincidences as merely coincidences – and not evidence of entities conspiring or systemic corruption. will probably enjoy this one.

October 2021, The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons featured an article called Covid Coincidence. In it Marilyn Singleton MD, JD asks some serious rhetorical questions.2Here’s the same article on her own website.

  • 1
    Those who see coincidences as merely coincidences – and not evidence of entities conspiring or systemic corruption.
  • 2
    Here’s the same article on her own website.

Why Have We Doctors Been Silent?

There are uncomfortable truths in this November 2021 piece by a UK doctor.

Not just uncomfortable for doctors though.

Because her insights and truths could also apply to nearly any professional.

Teachers, drivers, police, politicians, nurses, shop staff, journalists, athletes, air crew… whatever… insert your profession where she writes “doctor”, “medical community” etc.

One can see the path: we were good, compliant children and then good, compliant students. Now we are good, compliant doctors. I’m beginning to understand that goodness is measured in a different way, and obedience is not a virtue.

Obedience is learned through fear, threat and intimidation; it is in fact trauma programming and achieved through small control gestures when we were young and helpless. Now we are adults but still operating under these childhood programmes of beliefs and fears. We still feel helpless and beholden to a higher authority. We still submit to an authoritative decree even when it overrides our inherent moral compass.

Lucie Wilk

More on the dangers of obedience here.

One year on. Yet another black swan.

How many black swans are needed to destroy a hypothesis?

If you are actually scientific, just one.

Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:

However if you are a believer in Covid-19 public health policies, no amount of black swans will convince you.

So, neither the recent outbreak amongst fully jabbed and tested Antarctic researchers nor the isolated ship crew, antarctic explorers or military personnel I wrote about last year will matter to you.

You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.

Only you know why you are doing that.

My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people

Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.

Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?

No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.

But here’s another one anyhow.

This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.

  • 1
    For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people

If a tested and vaccinated group of scientists in Antarctica experience a Covid outbreak 7 days after arriving…

… and “they and others who tested positive were placed in quarantine but the virus continued to circulate“…

… what does that tell you about Covid testing, contact tracing, isolation and ‘vaccines’?

Real Science: “We thought testing would help us manage outbreaks. We thought minimising interaction and isolating close contacts would help slow the spread. We thought vaccines would stop the spread. So we would have reasonably expected that with ALL OF THEM COMBINED an outbreak would have been nearly impossible. Especially when everyone was tested before arriving on the base. But this ‘black swan’1I wrote about ‘black swans’ almost a year ago. Little did I know public health experts, Governments and media would still be ignoring them. event points to the need to face the reality that these interventions just don’t work for airborne viruses.”

Covidian Science: “Maybe the never-failed-us-until-now tests weren’t done properly? Maybe two negative ‘cases’ stood too close together and their negatives combined to create a positive, like in mathematics ?2That’s actually nonsense. But hey, I am after all trying to highlight that Covid Science is nonsensical! Maybe the scientists weren’t vaccinated enough? Maybe it was because they were so remote they got sloppy and didn’t isolate hard enough? Oh no, wait – I’ve got it! The article said nothing about masks. So clearly they weren’t masking! That’s it. The evidence is clear. Improper masking was behind the outbreak!”

Which kind of science do you follow?

Read the short news piece for yourself and decide.

In case someone realizes this story undermines ‘the narrative’ or creates ‘vaccine hesitancy’ and so takes it down, here’s a January 1st Wayback Machine version for posterity.


  • 1
    I wrote about ‘black swans’ almost a year ago. Little did I know public health experts, Governments and media would still be ignoring them.
  • 2
    That’s actually nonsense. But hey, I am after all trying to highlight that Covid Science is nonsensical!

Nurses protest overcrowding and staff levels…

… in 2014!

Because overcrowding and staffing issues were happening before Covid.

What if the Irish Government were now spending as much on hospitals and staffing as they are on Covid interventions?

What if the billions currently being spent on…

  • stay-quiet-at-home-payments (PUPs)
  • track-and-trace systems
  • advertising
  • PPE
  • experimental gene therapies (aka ‘vaccines’)

… were redirected into bolstering our the sickness health system and supplying known safe and effective interventions1like Vitamin D, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquin, fluvoxamine or other protocols?

Would we still have to sacrifice human and civil rights, mental health, physical health, education, work, religion and more to protect our sickness health system?

  • 1
    like Vitamin D, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquin, fluvoxamine or other protocols

18 reasons plus 17 more

In April 2021 Christian Elliot wrote “18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a Covid Vaccine“. In October he followed up with “17 More Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a Covid Vaccine

If someone HAS TO come up with 35 reasons why they don’t want a medical intervention, what does that tell you about the climate they’re living in?

If someone IS ABLE TO come up with 35 reasons why they won’t be taking a medical intervention, what does that tell you about that medical intervention?

If someone in favour of these ‘vaccines’ CAN’T REFUTE each of those 35 reasons, why should they be given any credibility or authority on the matter?

New Normal: sports people collapse, some die

Welcome to the ‘new normal’ where increasing numbers of fit sports people can collapse suddenly – and even die – with cardiovascular issues often involved.

Will journalists continue to ignore scientists saying that spike protein damage to blood vessels and organs is likely driving the sudden increase in stories like these? Will they continue publishing blithe dismissals like “it’s just a coincidence”, “it’s rare” and “nothing to do with the vaccine”?

Now that 5-11 year olds are being jabbed will we be told things like “young people get strokes too”?

This is one powerful vaccine!

Of all the vaccines I have taken in my life like Tetanus shots, measles, mumps, polio, meningitis, TB shots, etc…

… never have I heard so many lies and deceptions over a vaccine that says I have to wear a mask and socially distance even when fully vaccinated, and that I could still contract or spread the virus even after being fully vaccinated.

Never had to get tested when I was perfectly healthy without any symptoms whatsoever.

Never been bribed by the establishments to take the vaccine in order to win a holiday and/or cash prizes or earn frequent flyer points.

Never had to worry about cardiac issues, neurological disorders, blood clots and sadly more! Didn’t even have to worry about death.

Never was I ever THREATENED by the use of FORCE by the Government, employers, police and military for a vaccine (as seen overseas).

I was never judged by my friends or relatives if I didn’t take it.

I was never discriminated against for travel or other regular services to a point where I could not buy or sell without it.

The vaccines I have listed above never told me I was a bad person for not taking them – or even for taking them come to think of it.

I have never seen a vaccine that threatened the relationship between my family members and/or close friends to a point of destroying my relationships with them ever.

Never have I seen it used for political gain.

Never seen a vaccine needing 24/7 mass media advertising and promotion on every media outlet known to humanity.

Then there’s mixing and matching different vaccine brands and being told it’s okay to do it one day and then told the next day to not do it (science!).

I have never seen a vaccine threaten someone’s livelihood, as well as wipe out their jobs.

I have never seen a vaccine that allows a 12-year-old child’s consent to supersede their parent’s consent.

Finally, after all the vaccines (jab, shots) I listed above, I have never seen a vaccine like this one that discriminates, divides, and judges a society – and has to have any concern about it censored, deleted and removed from the internet and mainstream media!

So many doctors, health care professionals, police and scientists are censored and forbidden to speak out or ask legitimate questions – even when what is being allowed or not allowed does not make sense! Particularly when it comes from mainstream media.

I have never known a vaccine that has made all the Pharmaceutical companies that manufacture it exempt from liability if it injuries or kills anyone (even when life insurance companies will cover it!

This is one powerful vaccine guys! It does all these things above that I have mentioned… and yet… It does NOT do the one thing it is supposed to do which is: END THIS PANDEMIC!

How come?

Is vaccine science trustworthy?

If there has been shoddy science and intentional deception around previous vaccines why should we “trust the science” and public health officials this time with Covid injections?

Also, if there’s nothing amiss in the vaccine and public health world then there would be no need to ignore or cover up of harm, or attack those questioning things. Right?

So let’s start there… are there vaccine harms being downplayed or ignored, and are challengers being smeared, ostracized or otherwise censored?

If the sheer volume of childhood injections in that image (and the implication that kids are born with a horrendous vaccine deficiency!1Image from here) doesn’t give you cause for pause then I suggest you familiarize yourself with Dr. Paul Thomas.

A medical practitioner, Thomas committed to informing parents about the ups and downs of each vaccine. So some of his patients chose to follow the CDC vaccine schedule while others didn’t. No surprise there really.

But then he conducted a study comparing the overall health outcomes of his clinics vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.2If vaccines left us healthier you’d think the vaccine industry, the CDC and others would be doing loads of such studies to drive home the value of vaccination. But they’re not. Strange, huh? The study was published after peer review and showed the unvaccinated tended to be healthier. A few days later the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas license to practice.

Jeremy R Hammond has written about Dr. Thomas work and knows the details well.

Then there’s the story of Andrew Wakefield – also suffering because of his research on vaccines. As you’ll learn from his chat with Jerm, he did little more than dare to ask questions and suggest more research was needed.

He later learned of some deceptive vaccine science going on in the CDC and teamed up with Del Bigtree3TheHighwire.com to reveal it in the movie Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe (2016). The movie also highlighted the legal and financial protections given vaccine producers.

Vaxxed II: The People’s Truth (2019) saw the addition of Dr Suzanne Humphries, other medical professions and families prepared to speak about their discoveries and experiences with vaccination… including the way in which vaccines are most likely undermining naturally-acquired herd immunity.

  • 1
    Image from here
  • 2
    If vaccines left us healthier you’d think the vaccine industry, the CDC and others would be doing loads of such studies to drive home the value of vaccination. But they’re not. Strange, huh?
  • 3

If the Covid injections are so effective then why…

  • … are so many vaccinated people getting Covid?
  • … are case numbers so high in highly vaccinated areas?1Like Ireland’s very own Waterford
  • … are booster shots needed (unlike with other vaccines)?
  • … are Pfizer investing in developing a tablet??
  • … are the vaccinated being told they need to be protected from the unvaccinated???

Image from Telegram