… wondering if it’s a good idea to give your kid the COVID shot? I know there’s an ocean of mis/dis/mal/information out there to navigate, so I’ve compiled this handy list of reasons you’ll want to rush your child to the nearest injection site stat.Margaret Anna Alice
Too busy for all 50?
Just skim these nine here…
Continue reading 50 Reasons to Give Your Child the COVID Shot
June 23rd Del Bigtree aired his talk with Congressman Louis Gohmert (21:05- 48:50) about a letter he and other Members of Congress sent the FDA on June 8th.
The letter contained 19 questions. You can read them all on Robert Malone’s Substack.1
Then ask why they are not being answered.
More clips on the official episode page.
Friday 1st July, Margaret Anna Alice spoke with the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee about framing, philanthropathy,1 democide, her “why” questions and their answers.2
Her WHYs are comprehensive3 and grouped into four categories:
What answers does she come to?
Continue reading A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation
Not even for $1,000,000?!
For months double-jabbed Steve Kirsch has been asking for someone, anyone, to debate him or a member of his team. Offering $1M to help motivate.1
Winning the debate would be the quickest way to end vaccine-hesitancy. But even if they lost, someone from any of these areas just showing up would be at least reassuring:
Continue reading So bad no one can defend it?
If not, then he must be inept
Because a pot smoking comedian knew better. So did Dr. Scott Atlas – as early as April 2020.1
The data was clear. Even back then.
But, apparently, not to “needle-in-every-arm” Bill and his public health buddies.
Continue reading Is Bill Gates lying?
Show this article to your narrative-believing friends.
Especially the ones who “say they are open-minded, but that they ONLY trust things in peer-reviewed medical journals.”1
Amazing to find such a thorough compilation published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
So thorough that nearly every paragraph could be a highlight.
Here are just a few.
Continue reading COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?
… would hospitals be firing qualified, experienced staff for declining a brand new, experimental injection…
… while those who remain have enough free time and spare energy to rehearse and record amazing dance routines?
Dr. Paul Alexander reminds us of the New York Times piece from February.
The headline message might cause some to question the CDC’s integrity. Potentially helpful from a freedom lovers point of view.
However, the snippet he shared also implies better control of the virus could be achieved and more lives saved if we just had more info. Which is unfortunate. But also possibly deliberate on the part of the newspaper.
Continue reading The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects
… contributing to ‘vaccine hesitancy’?
Because it shows others they don’t believe the vaccine is effective.
Coincidence theorists1 will probably enjoy this one.
October 2021, The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons featured an article called Covid Coincidence. In it Marilyn Singleton MD, JD asks some serious rhetorical questions.2
Even if you exclude all of the 82 other types of vaccine and just compare with the flu shot.
Continue reading Soaring VAERS reports are because there are so many COVID shots being given?
There are uncomfortable truths in this November 2021 piece by a UK doctor.
Not just uncomfortable for doctors though.
Because her insights and truths could also apply to nearly any professional.
Teachers, drivers, police, politicians, nurses, shop staff, journalists, athletes, air crew… whatever… insert your profession where she writes “doctor”, “medical community” etc.
One can see the path: we were good, compliant children and then good, compliant students. Now we are good, compliant doctors. I’m beginning to understand that goodness is measured in a different way, and obedience is not a virtue.
Obedience is learned through fear, threat and intimidation; it is in fact trauma programming and achieved through small control gestures when we were young and helpless. Now we are adults but still operating under these childhood programmes of beliefs and fears. We still feel helpless and beholden to a higher authority. We still submit to an authoritative decree even when it overrides our inherent moral compass.Lucie Wilk
More on the dangers of obedience here.
How many black swans are needed to destroy a hypothesis?
If you are actually scientific, just one.
Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:
However if you are a believer in Covid-19 public health policies, no amount of black swans will convince you.
So, neither the recent outbreak amongst fully jabbed and tested Antarctic researchers nor the isolated ship crew, antarctic explorers or military personnel I wrote about last year will matter to you.
You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.
Only you know why you are doing that.
My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1
Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.
Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?
No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.
But here’s another one anyhow.
This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.
Real Science: “We thought testing would help us manage outbreaks. We thought minimising interaction and isolating close contacts would help slow the spread. We thought vaccines would stop the spread. So we would have reasonably expected that with ALL OF THEM COMBINED an outbreak would have been nearly impossible. Especially when everyone was tested before arriving on the base. But this ‘black swan’1 event points to the need to face the reality that these interventions just don’t work for airborne viruses.”
Covidian Science: “Maybe the never-failed-us-until-now tests weren’t done properly? Maybe two negative ‘cases’ stood too close together and their negatives combined to create a positive, like in mathematics ?2 Maybe the scientists weren’t vaccinated enough? Maybe it was because they were so remote they got sloppy and didn’t isolate hard enough? Oh no, wait – I’ve got it! The article said nothing about masks. So clearly they weren’t masking! That’s it. The evidence is clear. Improper masking was behind the outbreak!”
Which kind of science do you follow?
In case someone realizes this story undermines ‘the narrative’ or creates ‘vaccine hesitancy’ and so takes it down, here’s a January 1st Wayback Machine version for posterity.
… why do the producers demand – and get – full liability protection?
… in 2014!
Because overcrowding and staffing issues were happening before Covid.
What if the Irish Government were now spending as much on hospitals and staffing as they are on Covid interventions?
What if the billions currently being spent on…
- stay-quiet-at-home-payments (PUPs)
- track-and-trace systems
- experimental gene therapies (aka ‘vaccines’)
… were redirected into bolstering our the
sickness health system and supplying known safe and effective interventions1?
Would we still have to sacrifice human and civil rights, mental health, physical health, education, work, religion and more to protect our
sickness health system?
JP’s videos are funny. So are most of his ads.
Less funny though is what’s happening in our world around ‘vaccines’ (lifejackets), viruses (water) and death (drowning). It’s illogical, irrational and immoral.
JP exposes those things and more in these videos:
Continue reading How many life jackets do we need?