Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine?

The double-jabbed, cardiologist and former TV pundit – whose father (also a cardiologist) died because of a COVID vaccine induced cardiac-death – has switched from countering vaccine hesitancy to warning about vaccine dangers.

Why?

  • wilfull blindness
  • public health is declining
  • overall, medical drug impact is negative
  • most research can’t be trusted
  • relative risk reduction is highlighted, absolute risk ignored1Good explanation of difference between Absolute and Relative Risk
  • ‘numbers needed to treat’ are ignored2Number of people one needs to treat to prevent one instance of an illness
  • consent is not fully informed
  • most doctors getting their info from media or pharma sources
  • papers are misreported
  • regulators are c 80% industry funded
  • serious events revealed by vaccine trials ignored
  • at least 1 in 800 are harmed
  • scientific fraud
  • raw research data not being released
  • we have been trusting the psychopath…
Watch on YouTube

What’s worse than ignorance? …

The illusion of knowledge.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra3…quoting Stephen Hawking

  • 1
    Good explanation of difference between Absolute and Relative Risk
  • 2
    Number of people one needs to treat to prevent one instance of an illness
  • 3
    …quoting Stephen Hawking

The dumbest, most dishonest argument for Covid jabs yet

A computer model claims they prevented 3 million American deaths and almost 19 million hospitalizations. Imagine what they would have done if they actually WORKED against Omicron…

… in the interests of science – as opposed to The Science – I will demolish this absurdity in three minutes or less.

Alex Berenson

He does.

el gato malo does a more detailed takedown

passing off a model as evidence is tantamount to lying…

remember this?

so, if it does backfit and your major parameter assumption is wrong, it means the whole rest of your model is garbage.

… it’s pure GIGO1Garbage In, Garbage Out and the minute you assumed “vaccines worked well” then “vaccines saved huge numbers of lives” will pop out.

but if this assumption is wrong (as it appears so clearly to have been in the israeli palestine natural experiment comparison where death rates in the two places were near indistinguishable both before and after vaccination despite wide divergence in vaxx rate) then you’ve just “proven” nothing at all apart from the fact that models express the assumptions of the modeler.

el gato malo
  • 1
    Garbage In, Garbage Out

COVID vaccine hesitancy is associated with significant increased risks of a traffic crash

The [‘Canaadian crash study’] authors are not mincing words: they found that UNvaccinated people are MORE likely to have car crashes. Based on this statistical finding, they urge people to vaccinate to avoid car crashes!

But…

Guess who is more likely to get into a car crash? That’s right, the person who drives to work daily, as opposed to a remote worker.

And…

The Unvaccinated Could not Take Trains or Fly in Canada

So they had to drive more.

Oh, one more thing…

Turns out that people over 65, who do NOT drive to work, are the ONLY group where vaccination leads to a slightly higher chance of car crashes for the vaccinated (without reaching statistical significance).

This outcome is the OPPOSITE of what happened to employed people:

So we can see that the conclusion that “unvaccinated people are more likely to be hurt in crashes” is explained by the fact that “essential workers” who drive to work were the ones choosing not to get vaccinated!

So… It is not the COVID vaccine that reduces the chances of having a crash. It is a fact that staying home with warm coffee and a laptop is safer than commuting to work or driving a truck. The effect does NOT exist in old people who do not work.

Igor Chudov

Professor Norman Fenton: “A Study In Stupidity

Also: Dr. Claire Craig | Mr. Law, Health and Technology1Caveat: this is little more than an ad homenim piece, but does highlight a tendency toward bias among the study group.

  • 1
    Caveat: this is little more than an ad homenim piece, but does highlight a tendency toward bias among the study group.

Two Cardiologists, Two Countries, Separate Analyses, Same Conclusion

COVID-19 Vaccines are Not Safe for the Heart

… the general public and doctors don’t know what’s really happening; and they don’t even know that they don’t know.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra (1:37:00)

Nov 29, Dallas, Texas Drs. McCullough and Malhotra spoke about:

  • manipulated virus
  • military style approach
  • deceptive use of science and data.1E.g. Relative Risk vs Absolute Risk.
  • regulatory, media and political capture
  • censorship and being attacked
  • Pfizer and Moderna’s original trials showed greater risk of harm from injection than of catching COVID…

… I was cautious during the early months of the vaccine campaign but as the deaths accrued shortly after injection I could not remain silent by the late winter of 2021.  Dr. Malhotra in his presentation painfully describes his journey of emotional distraught, losing his father and last remaining first-degree family member, and then his relentless pursuit of the truth culminating in the publication of a pair of analyses concluding all COVID-19 vaccinations are not sufficiently safe nor effective to remain in use today… Together we have hundreds of published scientific reports and opinions.  We have delivered thousands of lectures and speeches.   We both have suffered professional retaliation for telling the truth.   We are not wrong about these conclusions.

Dr. Peter McCullough

Dr. McCullough’s slides (.pptx) | Senate Hearing he mentioned

Dr. Malhotra’s slides (.pdf) |

Dr. Malhotra’s papers

Malhotra, A. (2022). Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 1. Journal of Insulin Resistance, 5(1), 8 pages. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/jir.v5i1.71

Malhotra, A. (2022). Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 2. Journal of Insulin Resistance, 5(1), 10 pages. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/jir.v5i1.72

  • 1
    E.g. Relative Risk vs Absolute Risk.

CDC Lied about Vaccine Myocarditis Being Mild: 20% of Sudden Deaths Caused by Myocarditis

A better summary than mine of the Heidelberg autopsy study.

Our authorities claim that “myocarditis does not cause deaths” for only one reason: they refused to autopsy vaccine victims. As soon as autopsies of a representative sample of “sudden deaths” were finally done, as in the above Heidelberg study, it turned out that 20% of sudden deaths were myocarditis-related.

Igor Chudov

He also asks:

What Caused Other 80% of Deaths?

Here’s the list of “causes of death” for most of these subjects. Thanks to Brian Mowrey for pointing it out. A lot of them deserve their own substack post!!! Look at sudden-onset pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, thrombi etc…

Igor Chudov

Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

Table 2 Case characteristics

Here, we describe the cardiac autopsy findings in five persons who have died unexpectedly within seven days following anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination, with vaccine-induced myocardial inflammation representing the likely or possible cause of death. Our findings establish the histological phenotype of lethal vaccination-associated myocarditis.

This a small study: 5 out of 25 people who died unexpectedly within 20 days of a COVID-19 injection. But hard to dismiss as coincidental given the mounting evidence1e.g this, this, this, all this and that the authors reported:

During the last 20 years of autopsy service at Heidelberg University Hospital we did not observe comparable myocardial inflammatory infiltration. This was validated by histological re-evaluation of age- and sex-matched cohorts from three independent periods, which did not reveal a single case showing a comparable cardiac pathology….

More extracts…

Continue reading Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination

It’s All About That Spike

Jessica Rose, Ph.D + Steven Pelech, Ph.D

Why the toilet paper? She needed a model (see 34:00).1The two guests never appeared side b side during the interview. This is a composite I created. Oisin.

The two highly-qualified, pro-vaxxers spoke with Bernadette Pajer about:

  • innate and adaptive systems of natural immunity2Pajer was involved in getting it officially recognised in the State of Tennessee. Mentioned: “Antibody Deception” with Pelech and Rose
  • ivermectin helping with RSV and more?3Pajer mentioned this clip from TheHighwire.com
  • wild spike protein (in the engineered virus)
  • modified spike protein (from the injections)
  • Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone system – RAAS4the Jessica Rose RAAS video on YouTube
  • VAERS5Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System – user-friendly summary of its data on OpenVAERS.com – de-incentivised and under-reported
  • 6,000 deaths stopped vioxx – yet 32,200 deaths and mRNA is still going
  • redefining “vaccine” to protect makers of these genetic drugs from liability
  • auto-immune triggering
  • infectious DNA clones 6Rose cites Virology.ws (archive) and a talk with RFK J. Jay Couey, Ph.D., Robert Malone, M.D., Meryl Nass, M.D., Tess Lawrie, Ph.D. and Jessica Rose, Ph.D
  • impact on fertility7e.g. 40% of women experience menstrual changes
  • research projects they are working on
  • the loss of humanity, ugliness and need for civil discourse
  • forgiveness… we need to embrace it… for some.

Note: the 6-min break from 54:00 to 1:00:15 features clips from freedom rallies around the world.

This is a follow up to Dr. Rose’s “Antibody Deception” watercooler chat with Dr. Pelech on Oct 28 – covering antibodies, original antigenic sin, tolerance and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Canadians as early as Sept 2019.


Watch on ChildrensHealthDefense | Listen on SoundCloud

Featured: InformedChoiceWA.org | CanadianCovidCareAlliance.org

Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth

Had “Turtles All The Way Down1The subheading “Vaccine Science and Myth” distinguishes from John Green’s older book of the same name. received its deserved attention from the international medical community when it was written one year prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the world may very well have avoided the predicament that we are in today.

Madhava Setty, M.D.

Co-editors Mary Holland and Zoey O’Toole, who organised the English translation of the original 2019 Hebrew book, spoke with Bernadette Fiaschetti on One Life Radio Oct 6.

They also spoke with Steve Kirsch of The Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF) on Oct 20.2Some other topics mentioned on this VSRF episode: FLCCC Educational Conference (Steve Kirsch’s slide deck)| Texas Lyndsey on the Brook Jackson whistleblower court case | Billboards | ACIP decision

Buy through JeremyRHammond.com or Amazon.com3Link provided by Children’s Health Defense


Children’s Health Defense4Also | One Life Radio | Steve Kirsch | Rumble

Pseudovaccine Quality Inconsistency

Not a drug scientist? Not a pharmacist? Then a lot of this may go over your head.

But you’ll still learn enough to know that the synthetic, modified mRNA in the COVID injections and their production processes are untrustworthy.

Entirely.

There are flaws at every level.1See also Turtles All The Way Down (about vaccine science in general) – shorter 47min audio on Children’s Health Defense

Maria Gutschi tells Mathew Crawford and Liam Sturgess

… this was one of the more educational discussions for me during the pandemic. I am still learning about the regulatory processes, and being shocked by new twists and turns. It’s as if the drug distributors always had a thousand tricks at their disposal, and decided to use them all at once for the shock and awe many of us intuitively felt even if we could not decipher all of the many details.

Mathew Crawford


Watch on Rumble

For a more generalised view of issues with science, see Science For Hire

mRNA Vaccines Injure the Heart of ALL Vaccine Recipients and Cause Myocarditis in Up to 1 in 27, Study Finds

The latest evidence comes in a study from Switzerland, which found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people, with 2.8% showing levels associated with subclinical myocarditis.

An article replete with examples and references. Hard to pick highlights. But the 13-min Dr. Vinay Prasad video (near end of article) provides an overview.

There’s also these:

1. Australia as control

The official line on elevated heart injuries and deaths, where they are acknowledged, is that they are most likely caused by the virus as a post-Covid condition rather than the vaccines.

However, expert group HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has pointed to Australia as a “control group” on this question. HART notes that even though Australia had not had significant Covid (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-Covid deaths beginning in June 2021 (see below). HART notes that Australia “did not have prior Covid as a reason for seeing this rise in mortality and hospital pressure from spring 2021”. Instead, “the results from this control group indicate that the cause of this rise in deaths, particularly in young people, must be something in common with Australia, Europe and the USA”

Will Jones

2. New Zealand, Japan, Israel too

(Just coincidences of course…)

“The age groups most likely to use boosters show large rises in excess mortality after boosters are rolled out.” John Gibson, New Zealand.