Tag: Covid Lies

Chair of COVID-19 Commission: Fauci Not ‘Telling It Like It Is’

In an interview on “RFK Jr.1Robert F. Kennedy, Junior The Defender Podcast,” Jeffrey Sachs, Ph.D., chair of the COVID-19 Commission, explains why he changed his mind about the possibility SARS-CoV-2 leaked from a lab, and why he believes Dr. Anthony Fauci is not being honest with the public.

Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

But I wouldn’t spend much time on the origin issue. Because, as Jonathan Engler remarks, it’s a distraction that suits the narrative.

So why share it?

To point out Fauci is either outright lying or merely hiding something. Whichever is the case it makes him untrustworthy.

  • 1
    Robert F. Kennedy, Junior

On What Else Could They Have Lied To You About?

Following on from his episode on pharma’s parasitic nature, Maajid Nawaz was joined by Dr Tess Lawrie. CEO of the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy she spoke about the WEF1World Economic Forum and state-led Covid interventions – and better ways forward.

Like the World Council for Health and the Better Way Conference.

Dr. Tess Lawrie’s Substack | Better Way Charter27 Principles of a Better Way

  • 1
    World Economic Forum
  • 2
    7 Principles of a Better Way

On the Parasitic Practises of Big Pharma

UK cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra and public health professional Abir Ballan MPH1Master’s in Public Health spoke with Maajid Nawaz on the corruption and parasitic practises of the global pharmaceutical industry.

Ballan’s revelations about Case Fatality Rates, PCR cycles, WHO funders and more begin at 51:00.

Her (lay-person-accessible) review: The WHO Review And Why It Matters To You

  • 1
    Master’s in Public Health

The Fact-Checker Scam

… the Government and mainstream media fact-chechers actually have no problem with misinformation as long as it aligns with the adopted political agenda.

Jeremey R. Hammond

Starting with his own Linkedin experience 1Suspended for 1) resharing an old article on the 2009 Iranian Presidential election 2), correcting misinformation about ivermectin research 3), showing that the CDC’s own data falsified their claim that vaccine-induced immunity was superior to natural immunity. Jeremy Hammond joined Tom Woods to discuss the problem of mainstream “fact checkers” enforcing the establishment narrative.

He gave numerous examples of truthful information being suppressed including:

Continue reading The Fact-Checker Scam
  • 1
    Suspended for 1) resharing an old article on the 2009 Iranian Presidential election 2), correcting misinformation about ivermectin research 3), showing that the CDC’s own data falsified their claim that vaccine-induced immunity was superior to natural immunity.

Trying to make you believe the virus came from nature.

It is 2.5 years later and two papers appear on the same day?!? Should you believe it? I do not. Neither does Robert Malone or Chris Martenson. Here’s why.

Steve Kirsch

Other: Robert Malone | Chris Martenson1“Media Lies About Origins Of Covid” – premiered on 16 Mar 2022 but still relevant… including the name Kristian Andersen. | BBC: lying by omission?

  • 1
    “Media Lies About Origins Of Covid” – premiered on 16 Mar 2022 but still relevant… including the name Kristian Andersen.

The Twelve Lies Of Covid

In”The Covid Lies” former Pfizer Vice-President Dr. Michael Yeadon debunks twelve key narrative points in common sense language, using references where necessary.

Prefer listening? Yeadon talks through some of those lies with the Children’s Health Defense ‘Roundtable’ team here.

That was April.

Now in July, the Deborah Birx book and media admissions confirm lying was going on.

Result?

… crickets …

Matt Le Tissier – On The Record

February 1st, Oracle Films published this wide-ranging interview with the former England international and Southampton club soccer player.

An exceptional midfielder and excellent penalty taker, after retiring from playing Le Tissier became a football pundit – most notably with Sky Sports. All was well1Nothing unusual reported on his Wikipedia entry as of June 2020. until August 2020 when “he was dropped” by Sky Sports.

Probably just a coincidence but that was around the time he was becoming more vocal about the Covid response. But it meant his Wikipedia entry needed at least this addition:

In 2020, Le Tissier became an outspoken critic on the reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom, with several tweets in which he criticised what he deemed to be an “overreaction” from the government and media, among others opposing lockdowns and mask orders. An image he posted on Twitter which implied a comparison between the Holocaust and having to wear masks during the pandemic was deleted.

Wikipedia, April 24th, 2021

Le Tissier then began to comment on and question the growing numbers of athletes AND sports fans collapsing. So by August 2021 someone had added this sentence:

In 2021, Le Tissier drew widespread criticism when he again promoted conspiracy theories. He tweeted a post suggesting that Christian Eriksen’s on-pitch cardiac arrest was an adverse reaction to being vaccinated.

Wikipedia, August 20th, 2021

Matt Le Tissier… football star… tv pundit… turned conspiracy theorist.

Welcome to the club Mr. Le Tissier!

Thank you Oracle Films.

  • 1
    Nothing unusual reported on his Wikipedia entry as of June 2020.

The Vaccine Effects

Pandemic of the unvaccinated?

Yes, it is. Depending on how you define “vaccinated” and WHEN you record deaths.

Vaccines aren’t causing excess deaths?

No, they are not. Depending on how you define “vaccinated” and WHEN you record deaths.

Ivor Cummins explains how overall mortality and ICU usage can be made appear higher amongst “unvaccinated” people.

The Vaccine Effects – Mortality MAGICK

The Vaccine Effects – ICU MAGICK

Ivor referenced this presentation by Prof. Norman Fenton in the UK from last November. (If you want to understand the Professor’s background and approach, restart the video from the beginning. But be warned. You’ll also learn about other issues with the official data.)

One year on. Yet another black swan.

How many black swans are needed to destroy a hypothesis?

If you are actually scientific, just one.

Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:

However if you are a believer in Covid-19 public health policies, no amount of black swans will convince you.

So, neither the recent outbreak amongst fully jabbed and tested Antarctic researchers nor the isolated ship crew, antarctic explorers or military personnel I wrote about last year will matter to you.

You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.

Only you know why you are doing that.

My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people

Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.

Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?

No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.

But here’s another one anyhow.

This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.

  • 1
    For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people