Centralisation requires suppressing knowledge, learning, creativity, innovation and growth. It also assumes our complex world can be understood with, and managed by, simple models and one-size-fits-all policies.
Speaking with Ivor Cummins at the end of July, Nick Hudson discusses the dangerous effects of these fundamental flaws.
Pandata.org | Ivor Cummins (Odysee)
In 1951 Hannah Arendt warned a Technocratic Totalitarianism was coming. Different to Fascistic or Communistic Totalitarianism, it would be led not by gang-leaders like Hitler or Stalin, but by dull bureaucrats or technical experts.
Learn how we got here – and how we can respond – in this conversation between Ivor Cummins and author Prof. Mattias Desmet1
A wide-ranging discussion that explains and clarifies much – including the key differences between dictatorships and totalitarian regimes.
If not, then he must be inept
Because a pot smoking comedian knew better. So did Dr. Scott Atlas – as early as April 2020.1
The data was clear. Even back then.
But, apparently, not to “needle-in-every-arm” Bill and his public health buddies.
Continue reading Is Bill Gates lying?
Pandemic of the unvaccinated?
Yes, it is. Depending on how you define “vaccinated” and WHEN you record deaths.
Vaccines aren’t causing excess deaths?
No, they are not. Depending on how you define “vaccinated” and WHEN you record deaths.
Ivor Cummins explains how overall mortality and ICU usage can be made appear higher amongst “unvaccinated” people.
The Vaccine Effects – Mortality MAGICK
The Vaccine Effects – ICU MAGICK
Ivor referenced this presentation by Prof. Norman Fenton in the UK from last November. (If you want to understand the Professor’s background and approach, restart the video from the beginning. But be warned. You’ll also learn about other issues with the official data.)
How many black swans are needed to destroy a hypothesis?
If you are actually scientific, just one.
Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:
However if you are a believer in Covid-19 public health policies, no amount of black swans will convince you.
So, neither the recent outbreak amongst fully jabbed and tested Antarctic researchers nor the isolated ship crew, antarctic explorers or military personnel I wrote about last year will matter to you.
You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.
Only you know why you are doing that.
My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1
Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.
Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?
No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.
But here’s another one anyhow.
This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.
In his latest video Ivor Cummins looks at all-cause mortality statistics for Ireland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Combining those statistics with
- the real-world experience that ‘vaccines’ do not stop transmission
- boosters will be required to maintain ‘vaccinated’ status
- naturally acquired immunity doesn’t count
- the age-graduated risk profile of Covid
- and its flu-like survival rates…
… makes it clear that ‘vaccine passports’ are completely illogical as a public health measure.
So why are so many people unable to see that?
Ivor is not the only person who suspects the media play a central role in the collective psychosis.1.