I can already hear the hit piece vultures circling and chanting: it’s not peer-reviewed. No it’s not, but read it anyway and ask yourself if this study has merit. Decide for yourself. Maybe my summary can help…
… they accounted for the fact that injection status can change per individual at any time (injection time), and at each injection (event) time, that current status of the individual is compared with the current values of all others who were at risk of COVID-19 at that time.
So they collected and compared two rates: incidence rate for ‘up-to-date’ and ‘not-up-to-date’…
… the risk of getting COVID-19 is lower if you are not up-to-date (red). As time progressed (from the end of January 2023), the disparity between the two groups becomes more apparent.
The study’s authors did an excellent job of weeding out confounding variables. For example, could it be that Covid-conscious, vaccine-loving people test for Covid more often? The following chart answers this question: while the propensity to test somewhat affects the likelihood of getting a positive test, it does not explain the difference.
The authors also point out that their results are not confounded by age. However, in a disturbing finding, the female sex is associated with a 24% higher chance of a COVID infection among the vaccinated people…
Thousands of young people, including children and babies are affected
According to information released as a result of a freedom of information request (because the public health authorities wouldn’t publish it otherwise)1, there has been an explosion of serious cardiac episodes in Australia since April 2021…
… disproportionally affecting young people, with emergency department presentations for 10 to 29 year olds almost doubling over the period March 2021 to Feb 2022…
Note: Rancourt’s work seems to confirm Jonathan Engler’s “Lombardy Analysis“
… Dr. Reiner Fuellmich talks with scientist, social theorist, and researcher at the Ontario Civil Liberties Association and former professor of physics at the University of Ottawa Denis Rancourt…
… about the power of numbers, their creation and subsequent misuse throughout the so-called ‘Corona Pandemic’ to create fear and panic among the population. This was then used to order and implement an inhumane and unhealthy madness of measures that was subsequently responsible for an increase in disease and death rates. Based on valid data, it is clear that there were no significant increases in mortality rates in the spring of 2020, the day the global ‘pandemic’ was declared.
Denis Rancourt agrees that there would also have been no increase if governments had acted as they have in every past winter and flu season to date.
He cites the improper application of treatments in hospitals to so called ‘corona patients’ as the cause of an increase in illness and mortality rates, but also the severe adverse health consequences of the disproportionate measures taken to ultimately make people physically and psychologically ill or even, in quite a few cases, drive them to suicide.
With vivid visuals, he points out a massive and alarming explosion in excess mortality data from many countries only after mRNA injections began. He cites India and Israel as particularly affected, but also many other countries whose data he has analyzed and statistically processed…
Key proponents of vaccines won’t debate with sceptics – tending to withdraw at the last minute.
They also seem unable to cite or defend the ‘settled science’ in courtrooms.
Could it be because…
No studies have ever compared the total health outcomes of the CDC’s vaccine schedule between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. No system is in place or body of scientific investigation in the books to assess who may be more susceptible to adverse reactions to preempt injuries…
Correlation doesn’t prove causation so we can all safely dismiss these issues as mere coincidences. They’re nothing to worry about.1Sarcasm.
“I wouldn’t want any other parent to go through what we’ve been through,” said Rachel Hatton, after her 17-year-old son was diagnosed with a heart condition days after receiving the COVID vaccine.”
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
