Grand Jury Day 1

As our governmental, medical, legal1Jessica Rose gives just one example here. and many other institutions are no longer truly ‘ours’ it is clear that we the people have to save ourselves.

So a group of international lawyers and a judge are enacting Grand Jury proceedings in full public view. To present evidence of ‘crimes against humanity’ to the public. Worldwide.

Continue reading Grand Jury Day 1
  • 1
    Jessica Rose gives just one example here.

Chinada?

It sounds like Canada might be preparing to go all China on the massive – and peaceful1Watch their Feb 6th Address To The Nation if you doubt their peaceful intent. – truckers Freedom Convoy in Ottawa.

Talk is spreading of cell phone blackouts, riot police numbers increasing and processing centres being prepared while politicians refuse to talk, declare a state of emergency and use increasingly loaded terms – seemingly to justify aggressive action.

So the convoy captains, medical advisors and organisers put out a preemptive SOS call on 7th February.

Let us hope and pray for a peaceful end to the medical tyranny.


Why Have We Doctors Been Silent?

There are uncomfortable truths in this November 2021 piece by a UK doctor.

Not just uncomfortable for doctors though.

Because her insights and truths could also apply to nearly any professional.

Teachers, drivers, police, politicians, nurses, shop staff, journalists, athletes, air crew… whatever… insert your profession where she writes “doctor”, “medical community” etc.

One can see the path: we were good, compliant children and then good, compliant students. Now we are good, compliant doctors. I’m beginning to understand that goodness is measured in a different way, and obedience is not a virtue.

Obedience is learned through fear, threat and intimidation; it is in fact trauma programming and achieved through small control gestures when we were young and helpless. Now we are adults but still operating under these childhood programmes of beliefs and fears. We still feel helpless and beholden to a higher authority. We still submit to an authoritative decree even when it overrides our inherent moral compass.

Lucie Wilk

More on the dangers of obedience here.

One year on. Yet another black swan.

How many black swans are needed to destroy a hypothesis?

If you are actually scientific, just one.

Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:

However if you are a believer in Covid-19 public health policies, no amount of black swans will convince you.

So, neither the recent outbreak amongst fully jabbed and tested Antarctic researchers nor the isolated ship crew, antarctic explorers or military personnel I wrote about last year will matter to you.

You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.

Only you know why you are doing that.

My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people

Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.

Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?

No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.

But here’s another one anyhow.

This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.

  • 1
    For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people

An admission courtesy of those Admissions?

Alberta inadvertently confessed to fiddling the stats.

A good lesson in how the numbers are fiddled. Worth reading in full. But in case you’re not going to, here’s an insight:

Like everywhere else in the world they claim very impressive vaccine effectiveness by following the fraudulent standard set by the drug manufacturers in the pantomime clinical trials, i.e. to ignore the adverse outcomes in the first two weeks post administration.

But then they go one better and actually inflate the unvaccinated numbers too…

Almost half of all COVID hospitalizations of the newly vaccinated occurred within 14 days which means they were treated as unvaccinated in the stats.

Joel Smalley

If size matters…

… this will be hard to beat!

I don’t know how convoy lengths are measured. Is it simply a matter of counting the trucks and combining their lengths?

Assuming each was 25m long then it suggests some 2,800 trucks were needed to make up yesterdays 70km convoy.

And there’d have to be 6,000 involved now to make up today’s 150km total.

Plausible?

Guess we’ll find out when the various convoys all converge on Ottawa.

We’ll also find out what Spotify think of free speech soon. Or at least what they think of bullying. Because Neil Young seems to be saying they either dump Joe Rogan or him.

That’s ballsy Neil. Comparing your value to Spotify with what Rogan brings them. Good luck with that.

Good luck too with your thinning fan base. Because many who value free-speech and don’t like bullying are now dumping you.

Thanks Jessica for the update – and the trucker video.

A Second Opinion

Thanks to…

  • NGOs, Governments and medical institutions blocking innovative, safe and effective treatment protocols
  • medical boards oppressing doctors for daring to try treating their patients
  • fraudulent scientific papers and statements
  • skewed statistics
  • ignoring of natural immunity
  • mainstream and social media censorship and cancellation of those advocating protocols or asking questions
  • and more… (all being done for our sake of course!)…

… it’s been almost impossible to get a second opinion on Covid-19.

Until yesterday, January 24th, when Senator Ron Johnson held a Roundtable panel discussion in the US Senate.1766,148 views as I type A clever thing to do as the perspectives and testimonies of world renowned doctors, medical experts, researchers, legal and military professionals and members of the public are now in the senate record – and thus less censorable.

This discussion provides a different perspective on the global pandemic response and explores the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.

The panel starts at 40 minutes into the recording, then runs for almost 5 hours. Yes it’s long. But it’s an amazing 5 hours. Especially if you are a medical practitioner.2If you don’t have 5 hours here’s the highlights in 38 minutes.

More detailed time codes will be available in time. But here are the opening statements to get you started:

  • 00:40:15 Sen. Ron Johnson
  • 00:50:40 Dr. Peter McCullough
  • 00:57:00 Dr. Ryan Cole
  • 01:00:45 Dr. Harvey Risch
  • 01:07:25 Dr. Pierre Kory
  • 01:16:05 Dr. Richard Urso
  • 01:28:00 Dr. Christina Parks
  • 01:33:30 Dr. Mary Boden
  • 01:38:30 Dr. Harpal Mangat
  • 01:41:05 Dr. Paul Marik
  • 01:50:10 Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
  • 01:57:00 Dr. Robert Malone
  • 02:03:15 Dr. David Wiseman
  • 02:09:10 Dr. Christina Parks (vaccines on race)
  • 02:12:15 Dr. Richard Urso (acknowledging Sen. Johnson)
  • 02:13:20 Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
  • 02:21:50 Open discussion begins…
  • 03:44:45 Brianne Dressen, vaccine injured
  • 03:46:00 Kyle Warner, vaccine injured

Watch on Rumble