Vaccinated Rat and Human Heart Cell Study Shows How Hearts Get Damaged

Mathematician Igor Chudov reviews a research letter submitted to The British Journal of Pharmacology by a German/Hungarian team of scientists.

“We already know, based on cardiac damage markers in humans, that COVID vaccines cause heart damage, sometimes hidden, that is far from rare…

What is not as clear is: what exactly does happen to the hearts that raises biomarkers of damage?

Since scientists cannot remove and slice the hearts of living humans, the mechanism of this damage remains mysterious…

To explore this issue they…

“… used cell cultures to conduct an experiment unaffected by the many complications of testing the hearts of living organisms. They had proper control groups – Petri dishes with heart cells that did not receive the mRNA injection.

… and found…

The heart cells… underwent deleterious changes after in-vitro “vaccination.” Compared to the control group, the vaccinated heart cells malfunctioned in various ways…

But not because the immune system was attacking heart cells

Much of the discussion of “myocarditis” involves hypotheses of the heart being damaged by our body’s immune rejection of heart cells.

The Schreckerberg study we are discussing purposely excluded such immune reactions because it used cell cultures without any immune cells. And yet, they detected deleterious effects on heart cells (cardiomyocytes). There are more causes of heart damage than immune reactions could explain, authors show by excluding any immune-related factor.

We must appreciate the authors’ intent to concentrate on one particular aspect of vaccination.

“Here’s the most amazing part…

“… rarely seen in peer-reviewed studies published in official journals. The authors do not mince words and say we must re-evaluate giving people mRNA vaccines due to their cardiotoxic effects!

Igor Chudov

Read Chudov’s review in full, with extracts from the letter, here.

In case you thought getting more shots was a good idea…

Being Up-to-Date On COVID Vaccines Increases Chances of Covid by 33%, Cleveland Clinic Study Show

A new preprint is out entitled: “Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Those Up-to-Date and Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccination” … concludes from a multivariate analysis of 48,344 individuals (Employees of Cleveland Clinic) that ‘those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”’.

I can already hear the hit piece vultures circling and chanting: it’s not peer-reviewed. No it’s not, but read it anyway and ask yourself if this study has merit. Decide for yourself. Maybe my summary can help…

… they accounted for the fact that injection status can change per individual at any time (injection time), and at each injection (event) time, that current status of the individual is compared with the current values of all others who were at risk of COVID-19 at that time.

So they collected and compared two rates: incidence rate for ‘up-to-date’ and ‘not-up-to-date’…

… the risk of getting COVID-19 is lower if you are not up-to-date (red). As time progressed (from the end of January 2023), the disparity between the two groups becomes more apparent.

Jessica Rose

The study’s authors did an excellent job of weeding out confounding variables. For example, could it be that Covid-conscious, vaccine-loving people test for Covid more often? The following chart answers this question: while the propensity to test somewhat affects the likelihood of getting a positive test, it does not explain the difference.

The authors also point out that their results are not confounded by age. However, in a disturbing finding, the female sex is associated with a 24% higher chance of a COVID infection among the vaccinated people

Igor Chudov

Full articles on ‘the Cleveland Study’ by Jessica Rose and Igor Chudov.

Proven again: ivermectin 72% effective in prevention of Covid-19 infection

The study conducted in 399 participants [all unvaccinated1See press release here.] met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group 

MedinCell

Might this tempt Alex Berenson?

Continue reading Proven again: ivermectin 72% effective in prevention of Covid-19 infection

Australia’s Former AMA President Defects, Exposes COVID Vaccines

Former Australian Medical Association President and a former MP, Dr. Kerryn Phelps, just defected and is on our side!

A wide-ranging article in The Chronicle1Archive. reveals that she and her wife suffered devastating injuries from Covid vaccines. Dr. Phelps submitted her reports of injuries, as well as her mistreatment and silence imposed on Australian doctors, to the Parliament of Australia.

Igor Chudov

I read Kerryn Phelps’ submission.

A member of Oz SAGE, she seems…

  • worried about Long COVID2Something Drs. Marik, Kory, McCullough and others say can be avoided with early treatment
  • keen on masks (“evidence-based targeted mandates”) and mandating isolation of the infected
  • to want ‘misinformation’ tackled3Like some ‘myths’ she lists on page 5
  • to think children are at risk4No mention at all of age-stratified risk. No infection fatality rate or case fatality rates stated either.
  • concerned at reduced levels of testing
  • to want a zero COVID approach in hospitals and medical facilities
  • to prefer large-scale public health and government interventions over personal responsibility so no one is left behind…

Just some of the red flags I saw in her submission. Plus there’s this:

The vaccine injury happened to Dr. Phelps around July 2021…

What was she doing in January 2022? That’s right, pushing Covid vaccines to be administered to kids.

Igor Chudov

That’s what JJ Couey highlights while introducing Australian Doctors With Voices discussion on Dr. Phelps revelations.

Nonetheless I welcome…

… that pages 9-13 of her submission to the Inquiry into Long COVID and Repeated COVID Infections covered a lot of the harms associated with these shots – and the need to support the injured (specifically mentioning the React19 and CoVerse support groups).

Another medical professional speaking out. Great! Maybe the tide is turning?

Australian Media non-combative?

Phelps joins a growing number of high-profile physicians worldwide, including British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra and oncologist Professor Angus Dalgeish, who have turned against the shots after publicly supporting them in 2021.

But Phelps’s history of aggressive advocacy for the Covid vaccines – and all Covid countermeasures – makes her comments particularly hard to dismiss…

As striking as Phelps’s warning is the reception that Australian media gave it. While other physicians have faced scorn for their recent efforts to discuss potential vaccine injuries, Phelps is being treated largely respectfully.

Maybe the obvious failure of the vaccines to prevent Covid infection is leading to a larger reassessment of their benefit and risks, or maybe Phelps’s advocacy for other Covid countermeasures improves her credibility with journalists. Either way, though, the wall of silence around vaccine injuries seems to be cracking. At least a little.

It only took two years.

Alex Berenson

Igor Chudov | Alex Berenson | Submission 5105Archive. Here’s my downloaded copy of her submission.

  • 1
  • 2
    Something Drs. Marik, Kory, McCullough and others say can be avoided with early treatment
  • 3
    Like some ‘myths’ she lists on page 5
  • 4
    No mention at all of age-stratified risk. No infection fatality rate or case fatality rates stated either.
  • 5
    Archive. Here’s my downloaded copy of her submission.

COVID vaccine hesitancy is associated with significant increased risks of a traffic crash

The [‘Canaadian crash study’] authors are not mincing words: they found that UNvaccinated people are MORE likely to have car crashes. Based on this statistical finding, they urge people to vaccinate to avoid car crashes!

But…

Guess who is more likely to get into a car crash? That’s right, the person who drives to work daily, as opposed to a remote worker.

And…

The Unvaccinated Could not Take Trains or Fly in Canada

So they had to drive more.

Oh, one more thing…

Turns out that people over 65, who do NOT drive to work, are the ONLY group where vaccination leads to a slightly higher chance of car crashes for the vaccinated (without reaching statistical significance).

This outcome is the OPPOSITE of what happened to employed people:

So we can see that the conclusion that “unvaccinated people are more likely to be hurt in crashes” is explained by the fact that “essential workers” who drive to work were the ones choosing not to get vaccinated!

So… It is not the COVID vaccine that reduces the chances of having a crash. It is a fact that staying home with warm coffee and a laptop is safer than commuting to work or driving a truck. The effect does NOT exist in old people who do not work.

Igor Chudov

Professor Norman Fenton: “A Study In Stupidity

Also: Dr. Claire Craig | Mr. Law, Health and Technology1Caveat: this is little more than an ad homenim piece, but does highlight a tendency toward bias among the study group.

  • 1
    Caveat: this is little more than an ad homenim piece, but does highlight a tendency toward bias among the study group.

CDC Lied about Vaccine Myocarditis Being Mild: 20% of Sudden Deaths Caused by Myocarditis

A better summary than mine of the Heidelberg autopsy study.

Our authorities claim that “myocarditis does not cause deaths” for only one reason: they refused to autopsy vaccine victims. As soon as autopsies of a representative sample of “sudden deaths” were finally done, as in the above Heidelberg study, it turned out that 20% of sudden deaths were myocarditis-related.

Igor Chudov

He also asks:

What Caused Other 80% of Deaths?

Here’s the list of “causes of death” for most of these subjects. Thanks to Brian Mowrey for pointing it out. A lot of them deserve their own substack post!!! Look at sudden-onset pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, thrombi etc…

Igor Chudov

ALARMING Drop in Birthrates and Fertility Among MRNA Vaccinated Women

(And Men, I might add)

Mathematician Igor Chudov recently talked with Naomi Wolf about the precipitous decline in birth rates nine months after mRNA COVID injections rolled out. In several countries.

As he points out, correlation does not prove causation – but it is a signal.

interview on DailyClout.io

His key articles on this issue


DailyClout.io | IgorChudov.substack.com

Moderna DOUBLES the Chance of Infant Death, Compared to Pfizer

CDC’s own presentation shows that being given a higher-dose Moderna vaccine during pregnancy, almost DOUBLES the chance of neonatal death, compared to women who received the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine.

How can Covid vaccine given during pregnancy be safe and NOT affect infant deaths, if infant death rate for Moderna-inoculated women is double the infant death level for Pfizer-inoculated women and the difference is statistically significant?

Igor Chudov
Moderna DOUBLES the Chance of Infant Death, Compared to Pfizer

Not to be confused with
CDC Data: Moderna Causes 42% MORE Miscarriages Compared to Pfizer

CDC Data: Moderna Causes 42% MORE Miscarriages Compared to Pfizer

CDC’s own statistics prove beyond statistical doubt that the higher dose Moderna vaccine causes 42% MORE miscarriages, compared to the Pfizer vaccine, casting doubt on CDC’s claim that both are “safe for pregnancy”…

Slide 33 compares miscarriage rates of women who were in perfectly identical situations (vaccinated during pregnancy), with the only difference being whether they took Pfizer (30 mcg) or Moderna (higher dose 100 mcg, 50 mcg for booster) vaccine.

This is a true apples-to-apples, vaccinated-to-vaccinated women comparison.

The explanation is, likely, that we are seeing a dose-response relationship! Moderna is a higher dose injection — and Moderna-injected women have more miscarriages! If that is the case — and we’d need to confirm it more — this is all proof we need to know that Covid vaccines affect miscarriages.

Igor Chudov

Arkmedic confirms & discusses the:

  • trickery (or ineptitude?) employed in interpreting this v-safe pregnancy data
  • and the conflicts of interest…

… which seem to underpin published lies like:

Source: BREAKING: Igor just blew the lid off the V-safe pregnancy registry

The CDC slide both authors refer to has been archived here and here.

Is the depravity of using kids as shields finally coming to an end?

Aug: Denmark stops COVID injections for u-18’s

… children under 18 will no longer be offered a covid vaccine and can only get one after a recommendation by a doctor.

Here’s the text from the Danish health authorities website.1Oisín: see answer to “Who, how, and where?” question 2.

Peter Imanuelsen

Sept: UK stops stops vaccinating 5-11 year olds

Apparently, vaccinating any child that now turns five ended in August without any announcements. Now that this one off-programme is ending, it seems that children will not be offered the Covid vaccination until they are 11 or 12.

Naked Emperor

Igor Chudov sees the UK change differently – and provides some public and World Economic Forum-backed reaction.

Continue reading Is the depravity of using kids as shields finally coming to an end?
  • 1
    Oisín: see answer to “Who, how, and where?” question 2.