One Health, holistic medicine, and the poisoning of minds

Writing for PANDA, David Bell reveals the dangers lurking behind the ‘One Health’ concept – and what those who espouse it have in mind for us.

… medical journal Lancet explained the ideology of those driving the One Health cult in January 2023: 

“All life is equal, and of equal concern”, 

and further: 

“One Health will be delivered in countries … by taking a fundamentally different approach to the natural world, one in which we are as concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and the environment as we are about humans.

In its truest sense, One Health is a call for ecological, not merely health, equity.” 

The narrative, and its intent, are clear. Those pushing it envision a world in which any lifeform is considered intrinsically of equal worth to others. If you must choose between your daughter and a rat, the choice should weigh the probability of the survival of each, or assess which may do the least harm to other lifeforms after being saved.

Within this ‘equitable’ worldview, humans become a pollutant… Humans become a plague upon the earth, and their restriction, impoverishment and death may therefore be justified for a greater good.

It is difficult for people to grasp that this is a guiding ideology of public figures, as it runs counter to most human moral systems or Natural Law. People therefore consider this a misrepresentation of what is intended. If this is you, go back and read those quotes, and read more widely. We must understand the ideology driving this movement, as they intend that we should follow their dictates, and they intend to indoctrinate our children…

We tend to think such changes cannot happen in free and rational societies. To be convinced, we might need solid evidence of real totalitarian control. If we experienced mandated population-wide injections, people banned from visiting loved ones, or body-armoured police shooting at crowds and beating up old ladies for not wearing masks, whilst those promoting such policies lived and travelled freely, then we might start to wonder whether our preconceptions regarding society were wrong. At that time, we might start to believe that some in authority don’t really have our best interests at heart.

Exposing a cult

Evil is not defeated by hiding from it. It is fought by exposing the ideology that drives it – the greed, the lies and the deceit. We should not be overwhelmed by the scale and depth of wrongdoing. It may now be global but the people running it are as empty as those in past times, seeing the subjugation of others as the only way to address their internal inadequacies. Many more go along for the ride, doing their bidding to secure careers and pensions. This is normal, and has been faced before.

In the end, mad ideologues collapse under the weight of their own deceit and the shallowness of their dogmas. The earth-mother religion of a corrupted One Health and the feudalist ambitions of its priests will be no different. We should not fear public health or a holistic view of the world. They are ours and can be a force for good. Rather, we should expose the hollowness of the people who would subvert them, driven by their own greed and barren ideologies.

David Bell (PANDA)

Worth reading in full.

Ed Dowd: ‘They Can’t Run From This Data’

… Disability claims are on the rise… “If it’s not the vaccine, what is it?” asks Ed Dowd…

Children’s Health Defense

References:

Follow Ed Dowd On Twitter

PhiTech Website

Phinance Technologies Humanity Projects

Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)

In Surprise Reversal, NIH To Hand Over Communications Between Agency And People Injured By COVID Shots

Yuri Nunes, Ph.D.

Standard Deviation Explained And Visualized

How To Calculate Standard Deviation

Catastrophic Contagion Stimulation Scenario

HRSA — CICP

Mark Skidmore Study Retraction

COVID Data Tracker — Booster Percentages

Children’s Health Defense

COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake in Ireland Reports

They were being issued weekly until Week 07 2023 (week ending Sunday 19th February 2023). Then there was no report at all in March, and ..

As of April 2023, the frequency of HPSC reporting on COVID-19 vaccination uptake will change to monthly.

Health Protection Surveillance Centre1Archived: July 16th, March 31st

But two-and-a-half months later (mid-July), there are no subsequent reports. Despite data being available the most recent report is for Week 16 (week ending Sunday 23rd April 2023).

Powered By EmbedPress

Eurostat Interactive Tool

There is a lag time of a few months, and it doesn’t show years prior to 2020. But it still helps show official data at a glance.

Select your country (or countries) then mouse-over the dots to reveal that months % figure. As you do, please keep in mind:

  • the area ‘under the curve’ (between the graphed line and zero) is as important as the height of a peak
  • excess deaths would be expected to rise in Winter and fall in Summer.

You can also view this data in Table, Line, Bar or Map format directly on Eurostat. For example…

Explore the Eurostat data here.

Aaron Siri gives testimony to the Arizona State Senate

May 25th, the ICAN lawyer put the COVID-19 “vaccines” in context.1Speaking at The Arizona Novel COVID South Western Intergovernmental Committee hearings.

Do you know that…

… unlike any other consumer product producer, vaccine manufacturers are immune from liability for any harms their products might cause? (@ 10:25)

… some vaccines are deemed safe after just 3-5 days of safety studies? (@ 16:30)

… if a Pfizer trial investigator ‘feels’ Maddie de Garay’s paraplegia and other injuries are not related to her Covid injection, then that satisfies the FDA? (@ 1:16:40)

At around 23 minutes he brings us to the FDA website. To save you searching, here is the FDA’s Vaccines Licensed for Use in the United States page – and here is the package insert for the Hepatitis B Vaccine. Section 6.1 can be found on page 4.

Siri’s talk was part of a two-day event. As is to be expected these days, some media maligned the hearings and showed no interest in exploring any specific issues raised:

Here is the full 2-day event…

Continue reading Aaron Siri gives testimony to the Arizona State Senate

Dr Pierre Kory: How Big Pharma Run the Game

At this year’s Better Way Conference, Dan Astin-Gregory caught up with Dr. Pierre Kory of the FLCCC1Frontline Covid Critical Care) Alliance

Dr Pierre Kory recently published ‘The War on Ivermectin’ which documents his crusade to recommend a safe, inexpensive, generic medicine as the key to ending the pandemic.

In this interview recorded at the recent Better Way Conference in Bath, we explore personal attacks, professional setbacks, and nefarious efforts of the world’s major health agencies and medical journals to dismiss and deny the efficacy of various repurposed drugs, whilst looking forward to what can be done to restore open science over the next decade.

Dan Astin-Gregory

Dr. Pierre Kory on Substack | Dan Astin-Gregory

  • 1
    Frontline Covid Critical Care) Alliance

What Is A Model? We need to know…

… to test between good and bad science

… all models only say what they are told to say.

Models are lists of statements of the form “If this, then that”. No matter how large they grow, or how sophisticated, or how mathematical, or how computerized, or how much data that is put into them, or from what sources, their natures are not altered. They are always lists of “If this, then that.”

… Here is a simple, common, and most useful model, used by casinos the world over: “If this die has six sides, then the probability any side is up in a throw is one in six.”

That model says exactly what we want it to say, and only what we told it to say. It is an accurate model, too. It matches reality well; indeed, it makes beautiful predictions…

The model says nothing, not one thing, about what causes any side to be up on any toss. Efficient cause cannot be inferred from examining the model. No cause was built into the model. That is, none of the “If this, then that” statements (and there is only one) mentioned cause (except part of the formal cause, that the object has six sides). But the model is still good.

We conclude that models can be good and useful yet be silent on cause. The opposite is also true: a model can perform well in practice, but we cannot from that good performance conclude it has identified the cause of things. Ensuring cause has been identified is a much more difficult task…

Since all models only say what they are told to say, we can always create a model to say anything we want…

We have the freedom to specify the “If this” parts of the model, from which we sometimes can deduce, and sometimes must guess, the “Then that” parts. Or we can work backward, starting from desirable “Then that”, and picking compatible “If this” parts.

We have the freedom to say which and how much and from where the “data” goes into the model, and what “If this, then that” they are married to. We have the freedom to embrace any simplifications or approximations we want. We can, and an increasing minority even do, cheat…

This freedom comes with a cost. Since any model can be made to say anything at all, it means models can’t really be trusted until they are tested against reality.

Models certainly cannot be trusted because of the authority of who builds, or rather creates, them. That is a fallacy. And they can’t be trusted because “We need to do something and there is nothing else.” That is also a fallacy: there are always other options… [full article]

William M Briggs

Related: COVID: Lockdown Mistakes

Pandemic of the Vaccinated – Original Antigenic Sin in Covid Hamster Study

… one of the concerns with using vaccines against coronaviruses is the concept of Original Antigenic Sin (OAS). This phenomenon is where the immune system is trained on the variant in the vaccine but upon encountering a new but similar version of the virus, it responds based on its memory of the original virus rather than the new one.

So, if you were vaccinated at the beginning of the pandemic and your body was trained on the original Wuhan spike protein, the hypothesis is that when you encounter a new variant, your body produces a response against the Wuhan virus and not the new variant. This could mean you have a less effective immune response to the new variant, if any at all.

On the other hand, if your immune system is primed through natural infection, it is trained on all the different parts of the virus, not just the spike protein. You still get OAS but this time, if the spike protein has mutated into a different variant, your body will still produce an appropriate response because it will still recognise other parts of the virus that mutate much more slowly.

But this has just been theory. A group of researchers wanted to investigate whether the theory held up in practice and have recently published their report… The hamsters were given a three-dose mRNA vaccination, similar to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine used in humans. After the vaccinations, the hamsters were exposed to different variants of SARS-CoV-2.

The researchers then measured various outcomes, such as the amount of viral RNA in the hamsters and the ability of the hamsters’ immune systems to neutralize the virus.

These are the results, which I will explain below…

Naked Emperor

Full article on Substack