Tag: Science

A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation

Friday 1st July, Margaret Anna Alice spoke with the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee about framing, philanthropathy,1A term she coined democide, her “why” questions and their answers.2She ran out of time, but here are her promised notes.

Her WHYs are comprehensive3As are Steve Kirsch‘s. and grouped into four categories:

What answers does she come to?

Continue reading A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation

Scientific Misconduct Uncovered In The TOGETHER Ivermectin Trial

If you still Trust The ScienceTM it must be because you have no idea how it is being done.

Dr. Edmund Fordham mentions analyses done by Alexandros Marinos on his Substack.

Here’s the list of 56 issues identified by reviewers of the trial.1You don’t need to understand each issue. Instead perhaps ask why the trial has yet to be retracted despite this HUGE list of peer-identified issues… and… still no sign of the promised raw, patient-level data.

See also Dr. Pierre Kory’s trilogy on the same trial.

  • 1
    You don’t need to understand each issue. Instead perhaps ask why the trial has yet to be retracted despite this HUGE list of peer-identified issues… and… still no sign of the promised raw, patient-level data.

Fact Check: Covid as a Leading Cause of Death in Children

Pro-ivermectin? No amount of favourable peer-reviewed double-blind, randomized controlled trials will satisfy authorities.

Pro-vaccine? Cite an obviously misleading pre-print1i.e. not yet peer-reviewed and your preferred way of worsening2Geert Vanden Bossche has warned about this several times. Check out 01:00 to 14:50 of The Highwire –Episode 273: Sacrificing Science. ending the pandemic will be endorsed.

Trust The ScienceTM

Even if it can be torn apart in minutes.

Continue reading Fact Check: Covid as a Leading Cause of Death in Children
  • 1
    i.e. not yet peer-reviewed
  • 2
    Geert Vanden Bossche has warned about this several times. Check out 01:00 to 14:50 of The Highwire –Episode 273: Sacrificing Science.

So bad no one can defend it?

Not even for $1,000,000?!

For months double-jabbed Steve Kirsch has been asking for someone, anyone, to debate him or a member of his team. Offering $1M to help motivate.1I’m sure they could decline or donate the money if they wished.

Winning the debate would be the quickest way to end vaccine-hesitancy. But even if they lost, someone from any of these areas just showing up would be at least reassuring:

Continue reading So bad no one can defend it?
  • 1
    I’m sure they could decline or donate the money if they wished.

“And… if you tolerate this,

then your children will be next…”

Last year Conspiracy Theorists were using that Manic Street Preachers chorus as a warning.

Now, in June 2022, those we are supposed to surrender our sovereign medical choices and human rights to are advocating COVID injections for 6-months to 4-years old.1The Massacre Of The Innocents according to Toby Rogers

That these people are doing this when children are at near-zero risk from COVID2See here and here. Also this quote from question 4 (of 19) addressed to the FDA by 18 Members of Congress on June 7th: “As of April 2022, the CDC reported 484 COVID-related deaths among children ages five and under (over a two+ year period). According to the CDC there are about 24,000 deaths overall in children ages 0-5 annually.” So… an average of 242 annual “COVID-related deaths” (ie could all have died with and not from) in 0-5yr-olds is somehow considered an emergency in the context of 24,000 of that cohort dying annually anyway?? is mind-boggling enough.3At least four hypotheses seem to fit. 1) The ‘unvaccinated’ control group must be eliminated or at least minimized to hide the damage being done by the injections to the wider population. 2) This is a stepping stone to adding mRNA injections to the childhood vaccination schedule, whereupon manufacturers would be protected from liability forever. 3) They are still in the grip of the COVID mass formation. 4) It is another attempt at population control (which is on some peoples agendas – and has been attempted using vaccines before).

But check out HOW these people use The ScienceTM to make their case!

(Short on time? This 4-min video by Dr. Claire Craig conveys a lot. This 7-min includes her and conveys even more.).

Continue reading “And… if you tolerate this,
  • 1
    The Massacre Of The Innocents according to Toby Rogers
  • 2
    See here and here. Also this quote from question 4 (of 19) addressed to the FDA by 18 Members of Congress on June 7th: “As of April 2022, the CDC reported 484 COVID-related deaths among children ages five and under (over a two+ year period). According to the CDC there are about 24,000 deaths overall in children ages 0-5 annually.” So… an average of 242 annual “COVID-related deaths” (ie could all have died with and not from) in 0-5yr-olds is somehow considered an emergency in the context of 24,000 of that cohort dying annually anyway??
  • 3
    At least four hypotheses seem to fit. 1) The ‘unvaccinated’ control group must be eliminated or at least minimized to hide the damage being done by the injections to the wider population. 2) This is a stepping stone to adding mRNA injections to the childhood vaccination schedule, whereupon manufacturers would be protected from liability forever. 3) They are still in the grip of the COVID mass formation. 4) It is another attempt at population control (which is on some peoples agendas – and has been attempted using vaccines before).

Is Bill Gates lying?

If not, then he must be inept

Because a pot smoking comedian knew better. So did Dr. Scott Atlas – as early as April 2020.1The data is in — stop the panic and end the total isolation

The data was clear. Even back then.

But, apparently, not to “needle-in-every-arm” Bill and his public health buddies.

Continue reading Is Bill Gates lying?

Andrew Hill and the Forces Against Ivermectin

Phil Harper, documentary film producer and author of The Digger Substack, joined Dr. Pierre Kory1FLCCC Weekly Update (March 9, 2022) to discuss…

… who and/or what influenced Andrew Hill to change the conclusion of his paper on ivermectin – and why?

Meta-data suggests one Professor Andrew Owen might have been involved.

Continue reading Andrew Hill and the Forces Against Ivermectin
  • 1
    FLCCC Weekly Update (March 9, 2022)