He seems to make a good case. What do you think?
(P.S. He’s not saying it out loud, but his charts of the Canadian provinces, and Iceland, are each “black swans“. Ordinarily in science just one black swan would vanquish a hypothesis. But despite there now being quite a flock of them disproving COVID policies, some people still religiously follow The ScienceTM… even as it destroys them, their families, friends… and countries.)
… according to Dr. Robert Malone1At 11:04 during his January 6th interview with Patrick Bet-David – just a few days after his now-famous Joe Rogan interview aired and triggered an acceleration of censorship.2The original livestream happened on YouTube, but is no longer there. Apparently it violated the company’s Community Guidelines. However the Wayback Machine snapped it on Jan 7th (it may take a while to load and does not include a copy of the video itself – but confirms the livestream happened and had been seen 64,396 times by the time the snapshot was taken.
As I listened… and watched the PBD team do live searches to check some of Malone’s assertions… I marvelled at the horrible repressive, disrespectful, corrupt, truth-fearing world we have created.
We need a better world.
Urgently.
Here’s “The History of mRNA Vaccines” on Dr. Malone’s website – with links to his original papers and patents.
Here’s the Canadian Covid Care Alliance video Malone mentioned.
Here’s the joint interview with Desmet and McCullough he spoke of.3I am no longer using the term psychosis but will leave it on my site for the record.
The “What If…” substack article in which Malone highlights the 40% excess death rate reported by a life insurance company.4The Margaret Menge source article Malone links to in this piece might not be viewable from the EU for GDPR reasons. But EU readers can view it on The Waybacck Machine.
The Mary Beth Pfeiffer article about the 40% excess deaths in the 18-64yr age cohort (a cohort not expected to die as much as they seem to have done). Graph from the same:
Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:
So, neither the recent outbreak amongst fully jabbed and tested Antarctic researchers nor the isolated ship crew, antarctic explorers or military personnel I wrote about last year will matter to you.
You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.
My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people
Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.
Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?
No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.
But here’s another one anyhow.
This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.
“Alberta has been fiddling again, revealing more useful information. Is jab #3 the worst of all?” asks Joel Smalley.
A good lesson in how the numbers are fiddled. Worth reading in full. But in case you’re not going to, here’s an insight:
Like everywhere else in the world they claim very impressive vaccine effectiveness by following the fraudulent standard set by the drug manufacturers in the pantomime clinical trials, i.e. to ignore the adverse outcomes in the first two weeks post administration.
But then they go one better and actually inflate the unvaccinated numbers too…
Almost half of all COVID hospitalizations of the newly vaccinated occurred within 14 days which means they were treated as unvaccinated in the stats.
Joel Smalley
Thanks to…
… it’s been almost impossible to get a second opinion on Covid-19.
Until yesterday, January 24th, when Senator Ron Johnson held a Roundtable panel discussion in the US Senate.1766,148 views as I type A clever thing to do as the perspectives and testimonies of world renowned doctors, medical experts, researchers, legal and military professionals and members of the public are now in the senate record – and thus less censorable.
This discussion provides a different perspective on the global pandemic response and explores the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.
The panel starts at 40 minutes into the recording, then runs for almost 5 hours. Yes it’s long. But it’s an amazing 5 hours. Especially if you are a medical practitioner.2If you don’t have 5 hours here’s the highlights in 38 minutes.
More detailed time codes will be available in time. But here are the opening statements to get you started:
While I don’t agree with everything he says (like Zuby, I’m not into using substances to expand awareness) I found it refreshing to hear Rav Aorora having a Real Talk with Zuby.1Video version on Zuby’s Odysee channel.
“Narrative vs Truth” is a wide ranging talk touching on faith, science, psychology, censorship, travel, fascism, lockdown, psychedelics… and more.
Calm, sensible, thoughtful, humourous and with the integrity to acknowledge he got things wrong and the courage to adjust his perspective. Great to see in someone so young.
If we want a better future we would do well to support men like Rav.
And Zuby.
Robert Malone recently shared his experience of his own potentially fatal vaccine adverse event and his recently discovering that his vaccine came from one of the ‘bad’ batches.
Malone’s account fits well with Mike Yeadon’s Jan 7th presentation to the 86th sitting of the Corona Investigative Committee.
Yeadon outlines evidence of possible premeditated murder, using “hot lots” of Covid injections. He can’t think of any benign reason that would explain the vast differences in numbers of adverse reactions between batches.
His presentation centres around these two slides.
Website mentioned: howbad.info 1Backup duplicate site.
Yeadon detailing the Covid lies on The Highwire, June 2021.
Video by Paul Schreyer:
I thought the Rogan-McCullough interview was impressive. But this one topped it for me.
If you can’t make 3 hours to listen then perhaps make 10 minutes to read this excellent overview (with helpful time codes) from the Children’s Health Defense:
Real Science: “We thought testing would help us manage outbreaks. We thought minimising interaction and isolating close contacts would help slow the spread. We thought vaccines would stop the spread. So we would have reasonably expected that with ALL OF THEM COMBINED an outbreak would have been nearly impossible. Especially when everyone was tested before arriving on the base. But this ‘black swan’1I wrote about ‘black swans’ almost a year ago. Little did I know public health experts, Governments and media would still be ignoring them. event points to the need to face the reality that these interventions just don’t work for airborne viruses.”
Covidian Science: “Maybe the never-failed-us-until-now tests weren’t done properly? Maybe two negative ‘cases’ stood too close together and their negatives combined to create a positive, like in mathematics ?2That’s actually nonsense. But hey, I am after all trying to highlight that Covid Science is nonsensical! Maybe the scientists weren’t vaccinated enough? Maybe it was because they were so remote they got sloppy and didn’t isolate hard enough? Oh no, wait – I’ve got it! The article said nothing about masks. So clearly they weren’t masking! That’s it. The evidence is clear. Improper masking was behind the outbreak!”
In case someone realizes this story undermines ‘the narrative’ or creates ‘vaccine hesitancy’ and so takes it down, here’s a January 1st Wayback Machine version for posterity.
News of safe and effective medications and supplements is being blocked or hampered. Those who champion them are too. So the public aren’t learning about hudroxychloroquin, ivermectin, fluvoxamine, zinc, quercetin, vitamin C… or other things that could help end the pandemic.
We can add Vitamin D to the hampered list too.
Dr. Gareth “Gruff” Davies and Dr. Linda Benskin recently talked with Bret Weinstein on The Darkhorse Podcast about their experience trying to share the good news about Vitamin D. Their efforts, backed by 220 well-qualified signatories,, has been ignored worldwide.
For over a year.
Listening to their experience of censorship, double-standards, shoddy counter studies, editorial interference and more it is hard to believe that the never-ending Covid chaos is merely down to incompetence.
Listening to Weinstein calmly acknowledging he’d been wrong about Vitamin D and is now less dumb than he used to be, I find myself wishing other scientists, public health officials and ministers would display the same integrity and humility.
The pandemic would be over in days.
If you have faith in Covid ‘vaccines’ – and those pushing them, then this piece by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is going to shake that faith.
Your faith in the media is likely to be rattled too. Because they’re ignoring all this – while unquestioningly giving voice to those who insist we “trust the science”.
Anyone trusting this kind of science, and its perpetrators, promoters and apologists needs to ask themselves some serious questions.
Brace yourself for:
Here’s a video summary:
Here’s the PDF. Click the gear icon for Presentation (Fullscreen), Download and other options.
Thanks to Steve Kirsch for highlighting this stunning piece of work.
Well done Canadian Covid Care Alliance!
On November 11th Dr. Mark Bailey and Dr. John Bevan-Smith published a thorough exposé of the global deception, covering:
In these two videos Dr. Sam Bailey summarises their work. You can download or read the original paper on her website.
If there has been shoddy science and intentional deception around previous vaccines why should we “trust the science” and public health officials this time with Covid injections?
Also, if there’s nothing amiss in the vaccine and public health world then there would be no need to ignore or cover up of harm, or attack those questioning things. Right?
So let’s start there… are there vaccine harms being downplayed or ignored, and are challengers being smeared, ostracized or otherwise censored?
If the sheer volume of childhood injections in that image (and the implication that kids are born with a horrendous vaccine deficiency!1Image from here) doesn’t give you cause for pause then I suggest you familiarize yourself with Dr. Paul Thomas.
A medical practitioner, Thomas committed to informing parents about the ups and downs of each vaccine. So some of his patients chose to follow the CDC vaccine schedule while others didn’t. No surprise there really.
But then he conducted a study comparing the overall health outcomes of his clinics vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.2If vaccines left us healthier you’d think the vaccine industry, the CDC and others would be doing loads of such studies to drive home the value of vaccination. But they’re not. Strange, huh? The study was published after peer review and showed the unvaccinated tended to be healthier. A few days later the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas license to practice.
Jeremy R Hammond has written about Dr. Thomas work and knows the details well.
Then there’s the story of Andrew Wakefield – also suffering because of his research on vaccines. As you’ll learn from his chat with Jerm, he did little more than dare to ask questions and suggest more research was needed.
He later learned of some deceptive vaccine science going on in the CDC and teamed up with Del Bigtree3TheHighwire.com to reveal it in the movie Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe (2016). The movie also highlighted the legal and financial protections given vaccine producers.
Vaxxed II: The People’s Truth (2019) saw the addition of Dr Suzanne Humphries, other medical professions and families prepared to speak about their discoveries and experiences with vaccination… including the way in which vaccines are most likely undermining naturally-acquired herd immunity.
