A Second Opinion

Thanks to…

  • NGOs, Governments and medical institutions blocking innovative, safe and effective treatment protocols
  • medical boards oppressing doctors for daring to try treating their patients
  • fraudulent scientific papers and statements
  • skewed statistics
  • ignoring of natural immunity
  • mainstream and social media censorship and cancellation of those advocating protocols or asking questions
  • and more… (all being done for our sake of course!)…

… it’s been almost impossible to get a second opinion on Covid-19.

Until yesterday, January 24th, when Senator Ron Johnson held a Roundtable panel discussion in the US Senate.1766,148 views as I type A clever thing to do as the perspectives and testimonies of world renowned doctors, medical experts, researchers, legal and military professionals and members of the public are now in the senate record – and thus less censorable.

This discussion provides a different perspective on the global pandemic response and explores the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.

The panel starts at 40 minutes into the recording, then runs for almost 5 hours. Yes it’s long. But it’s an amazing 5 hours. Especially if you are a medical practitioner.2If you don’t have 5 hours here’s the highlights in 38 minutes.

More detailed time codes will be available in time. But here are the opening statements to get you started:

  • 00:40:15 Sen. Ron Johnson
  • 00:50:40 Dr. Peter McCullough
  • 00:57:00 Dr. Ryan Cole
  • 01:00:45 Dr. Harvey Risch
  • 01:07:25 Dr. Pierre Kory
  • 01:16:05 Dr. Richard Urso
  • 01:28:00 Dr. Christina Parks
  • 01:33:30 Dr. Mary Boden
  • 01:38:30 Dr. Harpal Mangat
  • 01:41:05 Dr. Paul Marik
  • 01:50:10 Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
  • 01:57:00 Dr. Robert Malone
  • 02:03:15 Dr. David Wiseman
  • 02:09:10 Dr. Christina Parks (vaccines on race)
  • 02:12:15 Dr. Richard Urso (acknowledging Sen. Johnson)
  • 02:13:20 Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
  • 02:21:50 Open discussion begins…
  • 03:44:45 Brianne Dressen, vaccine injured
  • 03:46:00 Kyle Warner, vaccine injured

Watch on Rumble


Rav Arora with Zuby

While I don’t agree with everything he says (like Zuby, I’m not into using substances to expand awareness) I found it refreshing to hear Rav Aorora having a Real Talk with Zuby.1Video version on Zuby’s Odysee channel.

“Narrative vs Truth” is a wide ranging talk touching on faith, science, psychology, censorship, travel, fascism, lockdown, psychedelics… and more.

Calm, sensible, thoughtful, humourous and with the integrity to acknowledge he got things wrong and the courage to adjust his perspective. Great to see in someone so young.

If we want a better future we would do well to support men like Rav.

And Zuby.

How Bad Is My Batch?

Robert Malone recently shared his experience of his own potentially fatal vaccine adverse event and his recently discovering that his vaccine came from one of the ‘bad’ batches.

Malone’s account fits well with Mike Yeadon’s Jan 7th presentation to the 86th sitting of the Corona Investigative Committee.

Yeadon outlines evidence of possible premeditated murder, using “hot lots” of Covid injections. He can’t think of any benign reason that would explain the vast differences in numbers of adverse reactions between batches.

His presentation centres around these two slides.

Note the small number range, 0-40, on vertical Y-axis
Range on vertical Y-axis is 0-700, far wider than with flu vaccines (previous slide)

Website mentioned: howbad.info 1Backup duplicate site.

Yeadon detailing the Covid lies on The Highwire, June 2021.

Video by Paul Schreyer:


Joe Rogan interviews Dr. Robert Malone

I thought the Rogan-McCullough interview was impressive. But this one topped it for me.

“Most important interview of our time?”

If you can’t make 3 hours to listen then perhaps make 10 minutes to read this excellent overview (with helpful time codes) from the Children’s Health Defense:

If a tested and vaccinated group of scientists in Antarctica experience a Covid outbreak 7 days after arriving…

… and “they and others who tested positive were placed in quarantine but the virus continued to circulate“…

… what does that tell you about Covid testing, contact tracing, isolation and ‘vaccines’?

Real Science: “We thought testing would help us manage outbreaks. We thought minimising interaction and isolating close contacts would help slow the spread. We thought vaccines would stop the spread. So we would have reasonably expected that with ALL OF THEM COMBINED an outbreak would have been nearly impossible. Especially when everyone was tested before arriving on the base. But this ‘black swan’1I wrote about ‘black swans’ almost a year ago. Little did I know public health experts, Governments and media would still be ignoring them. event points to the need to face the reality that these interventions just don’t work for airborne viruses.”

Covidian Science: “Maybe the never-failed-us-until-now tests weren’t done properly? Maybe two negative ‘cases’ stood too close together and their negatives combined to create a positive, like in mathematics ?2That’s actually nonsense. But hey, I am after all trying to highlight that Covid Science is nonsensical! Maybe the scientists weren’t vaccinated enough? Maybe it was because they were so remote they got sloppy and didn’t isolate hard enough? Oh no, wait – I’ve got it! The article said nothing about masks. So clearly they weren’t masking! That’s it. The evidence is clear. Improper masking was behind the outbreak!”

Which kind of science do you follow?

Read the short news piece for yourself and decide.

In case someone realizes this story undermines ‘the narrative’ or creates ‘vaccine hesitancy’ and so takes it down, here’s a January 1st Wayback Machine version for posterity.


  • 1
    I wrote about ‘black swans’ almost a year ago. Little did I know public health experts, Governments and media would still be ignoring them.
  • 2
    That’s actually nonsense. But hey, I am after all trying to highlight that Covid Science is nonsensical!

Vitamin D story shows (yet again) that this is not about health

News of safe and effective medications and supplements is being blocked or hampered. Those who champion them are too. So the public aren’t learning about hudroxychloroquin, ivermectin, fluvoxamine, zinc, quercetin, vitamin C… or other things that could help end the pandemic.

We can add Vitamin D to the hampered list too.

Dr. Gareth “Gruff” Davies and Dr. Linda Benskin recently talked with Bret Weinstein on The Darkhorse Podcast about their experience trying to share the good news about Vitamin D. Their efforts, backed by 220 well-qualified signatories,, has been ignored worldwide.

For over a year.

Listening to their experience of censorship, double-standards, shoddy counter studies, editorial interference and more it is hard to believe that the never-ending Covid chaos is merely down to incompetence.

Listening to Weinstein calmly acknowledging he’d been wrong about Vitamin D and is now less dumb than he used to be, I find myself wishing other scientists, public health officials and ministers would display the same integrity and humility.

The pandemic would be over in days.

More Harm Than Good

If you have faith in Covid ‘vaccines’ – and those pushing them, then this piece by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is going to shake that faith.

Your faith in the media is likely to be rattled too. Because they’re ignoring all this – while unquestioningly giving voice to those who insist we “trust the science”.

Anyone trusting this kind of science, and its perpetrators, promoters and apologists needs to ask themselves some serious questions.

Brace yourself for:

  • sneaky sophistry1subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
  • more deaths in inoculated group
  • more adverse events in inoculated group
  • dodgy demographic design2e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented
  • trial unblinded after just 2 months, so long-term safety can never be determined
  • inappropriate endpoints chosen
  • reduction in transmission of Covid never tested for
  • not all participants were tested for Covid
  • 80 participants were “lost to follow up”
  • under powered trial for 12-15 year olds
  • horrific outcomes for 12 year old participant Maddie de Garay misrepresented
  • downplaying impact of myocarditis
  • FDA want 50+ years to release >300,000 pages of data
  • 84% of the authors have conflicts of interest
  • CDC changed the definition of vaccine, accommodating these injections…

Here’s a video summary:

Here’s the PDF. Click the gear icon for Presentation (Fullscreen), Download and other options.

Thanks to Steve Kirsch for highlighting this stunning piece of work.

Well done Canadian Covid Care Alliance!

  • 1
    subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
  • 2
    e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented

The COVID-19 Fraud & War On Humanity

On November 11th Dr. Mark Bailey and Dr. John Bevan-Smith published a thorough exposé of the global deception, covering:

  • the “double deception” sustaining the illusion of a virus1“The COVID-19 crime against humanity requires the absence of this virus so there is no material reference against which the make-believe genome can be cross-checked, to establish, for instance, whether or not the purported SARS-CoV-2 proteins specifically stem from the alleged virus.”
  • the (dodgy) virology studies from various institutions
  • some of the key (pro-vaccine) players funding them
  • the (inappropriately used) PCR test
  • the (inaccurate) modelling of outbreaks
  • the (strange) objects pathologists have found in deceased jab recipients
  • the (liability-free) deals government made with vaccine producers…

In these two videos Dr. Sam Bailey summarises their work. You can download or read the original paper on her website.

  • 1
    “The COVID-19 crime against humanity requires the absence of this virus so there is no material reference against which the make-believe genome can be cross-checked, to establish, for instance, whether or not the purported SARS-CoV-2 proteins specifically stem from the alleged virus.”

Is vaccine science trustworthy?

If there has been shoddy science and intentional deception around previous vaccines why should we “trust the science” and public health officials this time with Covid injections?

Also, if there’s nothing amiss in the vaccine and public health world then there would be no need to ignore or cover up of harm, or attack those questioning things. Right?

So let’s start there… are there vaccine harms being downplayed or ignored, and are challengers being smeared, ostracized or otherwise censored?

If the sheer volume of childhood injections in that image (and the implication that kids are born with a horrendous vaccine deficiency!1Image from here) doesn’t give you cause for pause then I suggest you familiarize yourself with Dr. Paul Thomas.

A medical practitioner, Thomas committed to informing parents about the ups and downs of each vaccine. So some of his patients chose to follow the CDC vaccine schedule while others didn’t. No surprise there really.

But then he conducted a study comparing the overall health outcomes of his clinics vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.2If vaccines left us healthier you’d think the vaccine industry, the CDC and others would be doing loads of such studies to drive home the value of vaccination. But they’re not. Strange, huh? The study was published after peer review and showed the unvaccinated tended to be healthier. A few days later the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas license to practice.

Jeremy R Hammond has written about Dr. Thomas work and knows the details well.

Then there’s the story of Andrew Wakefield – also suffering because of his research on vaccines. As you’ll learn from his chat with Jerm, he did little more than dare to ask questions and suggest more research was needed.

He later learned of some deceptive vaccine science going on in the CDC and teamed up with Del Bigtree3TheHighwire.com to reveal it in the movie Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe (2016). The movie also highlighted the legal and financial protections given vaccine producers.

Vaxxed II: The People’s Truth (2019) saw the addition of Dr Suzanne Humphries, other medical professions and families prepared to speak about their discoveries and experiences with vaccination… including the way in which vaccines are most likely undermining naturally-acquired herd immunity.

  • 1
    Image from here
  • 2
    If vaccines left us healthier you’d think the vaccine industry, the CDC and others would be doing loads of such studies to drive home the value of vaccination. But they’re not. Strange, huh?
  • 3