All-cause Death Numbers Show The Truth

Note: Rancourt’s work seems to confirm Jonathan Engler’s “Lombardy Analysis

… Dr. Reiner Fuellmich talks with scientist, social theorist, and researcher at the Ontario Civil Liberties Association and former professor of physics at the University of Ottawa Denis Rancourt…

… about the power of numbers, their creation and subsequent misuse throughout the so-called ‘Corona Pandemic’ to create fear and panic among the population. This was then used to order and implement an inhumane and unhealthy madness of measures that was subsequently responsible for an increase in disease and death rates. Based on valid data, it is clear that there were no significant increases in mortality rates in the spring of 2020, the day the global ‘pandemic’ was declared.

Denis Rancourt agrees that there would also have been no increase if governments had acted as they have in every past winter and flu season to date.

He cites the improper application of treatments in hospitals to so called ‘corona patients’ as the cause of an increase in illness and mortality rates, but also the severe adverse health consequences of the disproportionate measures taken to ultimately make people physically and psychologically ill or even, in quite a few cases, drive them to suicide.

With vivid visuals, he points out a massive and alarming explosion in excess mortality data from many countries only after mRNA injections began. He cites India and Israel as particularly affected, but also many other countries whose data he has analyzed and statistically processed…

ICIC.law

Related: testimony to the National Citizen’s Inquiry (17th May) | DenisRancourt.ca

The Once Elusive Vaccine Debate Goes Mainstream

Key proponents of vaccines won’t debate with sceptics – tending to withdraw at the last minute.

They also seem unable to cite or defend the ‘settled science’ in courtrooms.

Could it be because…

No studies have ever compared the total health outcomes of the CDC’s vaccine schedule between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. No system is in place or body of scientific investigation in the books to assess who may be more susceptible to adverse reactions to preempt injuries…

Jefferey Jaxen

Jaxen’s article on the issue will tell you more.

Jessica Rose – PhD Computational Biologist -Talking Covid, Vaccines & more with Viva Frei Live

If you have a long journey ahead this good-humoured, wide-ranging conversation between two Canadians might help.

Covid response was never about health. PCR is not a test. VAERS soaring numbers are not because we’re injecting so many. Peer review is untrustworthy. The virus was created. Finding solutions is a priority.

People are fighting their own cognitive dissonance right now… go easy on them…

Live Q&A with VSRF Founder Steve Kirsch & Pfizer Whistleblower Melissa McAttee

Q&A with Michelle McAttee begins at 25:45… aborted foetal cell lines… deliberate withholding of info from public… Covid injections made in China… Remdesivir (aka Veklury) made by Pfizer for Gilead1which the WHO recommends AGAINST using for Covid-19


Vaccine Safety Research Foundation | How Bad Is My Batch?

US Federal Aviation Authority has very quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal

On October 24, 2022, the FAA quietly, without any announcement at all, widened the EKG requirements necessary for pilots to be able to fly.

The PR (a measure of heart function)1Helpful info & graph here. used to be in the range of .12 to .2.

It is now: .12 to .3 and potentially even higher.

This is a very wide range; it accommodates people who have cardiac injury. Cardiologist Thomas Levy is appalled at this change:

We discuss his article Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common.

Basically, the vaccines are causing heart injury in at least 2.8% of people who get the shot. So 7M Americans now have hearts damaged by the COVID vaccine. He admits the number could be over 100M. The fact that the FAA *quietly* changed the EKG parameters for pilots suggests that the vaccine is causing a huge number of pilots to fail their screening. This is a tacit admission of a huge problem.

Swiss study of 777 people post-vaccine

Continue reading US Federal Aviation Authority has very quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal

A second paper confirms the mRNA shots cause recipients to make less effective antibodies to the coronavirus over time

No one knows yet what the long-term effects of this change may be, but – spoiler alert – they probably aren’t good.

Also: what did Pfizer know and when… ?

People who have received the mRNA Covid jabs from Pfizer and Moderna have an increasingly unusual immune system response after the second shot, German researchers have found.

The new finding confirms and expands a report in December from other German researchers, who found a similar trend in people who had received a booster shot…

Continue reading A second paper confirms the mRNA shots cause recipients to make less effective antibodies to the coronavirus over time

Hindsight: what were the odds?

Age-stratified infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population

The largest burden of COVID-19 is carried by the elderly, and persons living in nursing homes are particularly vulnerable. However, 94% of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86% is younger than 60 years. The objective of this study was to accurately estimate the infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 among non-elderly people in the absence of vaccination or prior infection… we identified 40 eligible national seroprevalence studies covering 38 countries with pre-vaccination seroprevalence data…

Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Cathrine Axfors, Despina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Alexandre Apostolatos, John P.A. Ioannidis, (Jan 1, 2023)

Key numbers

AgeIFRSurvival Rate
0-190.0003%99.9997%
20-290.002%99.998%
30-390.011%99.989%
40-490.035%99.965%
50-590.123%99.877%
60-690.506%99.494%
Sourc:e: (ioannidis et al Jan 1, 2023)

The median IFR for kids is just 0.0003% so…

If your kid gets COVID, the risk is 3 in 1 million that your child will die from COVID. And that is likely an over-estimate because today all early treatment protocols are suppressed worldwide.

Steve Kirsch (referencing a previous Ioannidis study with similar findings, Oct 2022)

Covid’s Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) Has Always Been Similar to the Flu

Oct 2022: Rav Arora on a prior Ioannidis study…

Continue reading Hindsight: what were the odds?

Proven again: ivermectin 72% effective in prevention of Covid-19 infection

The study conducted in 399 participants [all unvaccinated1See press release here.] met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group 

MedinCell

Might this tempt Alex Berenson?

Continue reading Proven again: ivermectin 72% effective in prevention of Covid-19 infection

Dr. John Campbell: Time to pause covid mass vaccination

Pro-vax, nursing educator followed The Science actual science

So far he has not posted this on his YouTube. Probably concerned about being censored or deplatformed. Only on his Rumble channel for the moment.

Watch on Rumble

Transcript

My name is John Campbell, I am a semi-retired clinical nurse, nurse lecturer, academic, researcher and author of numerous articles and two text books.

My specialisms are human physiology and pathophysiology, as applied to clinical practice. I have also produced many educational videos which are used extensively around the world.

Continue reading Dr. John Campbell: Time to pause covid mass vaccination

Plausibility But Not Science Has Dominated Public Discussions of the Covid Pandemic

Harvey Risch is physician and a Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine. His recent critique of The ScienceTM contains so many bombshells, I struggled to pick highlights. But hopefully these snippets will entice you to click through and read the whole thing.1It gets technical at times. But you don’t need to understand all the numbers to understand his points about Randomized Controlled Trials.

… plausible theories are easy to believe, and that is the problem. That is what we have been fed for almost three years of the Covid-19 pandemic. In fact though, we have been fed plausibility instead of science for much longer…

Continue reading Plausibility But Not Science Has Dominated Public Discussions of the Covid Pandemic
  • 1
    It gets technical at times. But you don’t need to understand all the numbers to understand his points about Randomized Controlled Trials.

Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine?

The double-jabbed, cardiologist and former TV pundit – whose father (also a cardiologist) died because of a COVID vaccine induced cardiac-death – has switched from countering vaccine hesitancy to warning about vaccine dangers.

Why?

  • wilfull blindness
  • public health is declining
  • overall, medical drug impact is negative
  • most research can’t be trusted
  • relative risk reduction is highlighted, absolute risk ignored1Good explanation of difference between Absolute and Relative Risk
  • ‘numbers needed to treat’ are ignored2Number of people one needs to treat to prevent one instance of an illness
  • consent is not fully informed
  • most doctors getting their info from media or pharma sources
  • papers are misreported
  • regulators are c 80% industry funded
  • serious events revealed by vaccine trials ignored
  • at least 1 in 800 are harmed
  • scientific fraud
  • raw research data not being released
  • we have been trusting the psychopath…
Watch on YouTube

What’s worse than ignorance? …

The illusion of knowledge.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra3…quoting Stephen Hawking

  • 1
    Good explanation of difference between Absolute and Relative Risk
  • 2
    Number of people one needs to treat to prevent one instance of an illness
  • 3
    …quoting Stephen Hawking

The dumbest, most dishonest argument for Covid jabs yet

A computer model claims they prevented 3 million American deaths and almost 19 million hospitalizations. Imagine what they would have done if they actually WORKED against Omicron…

… in the interests of science – as opposed to The Science – I will demolish this absurdity in three minutes or less.

Alex Berenson

He does.

el gato malo does a more detailed takedown

passing off a model as evidence is tantamount to lying…

remember this?

so, if it does backfit and your major parameter assumption is wrong, it means the whole rest of your model is garbage.

… it’s pure GIGO1Garbage In, Garbage Out and the minute you assumed “vaccines worked well” then “vaccines saved huge numbers of lives” will pop out.

but if this assumption is wrong (as it appears so clearly to have been in the israeli palestine natural experiment comparison where death rates in the two places were near indistinguishable both before and after vaccination despite wide divergence in vaxx rate) then you’ve just “proven” nothing at all apart from the fact that models express the assumptions of the modeler.

el gato malo
  • 1
    Garbage In, Garbage Out

COVID vaccine hesitancy is associated with significant increased risks of a traffic crash

The [‘Canaadian crash study’] authors are not mincing words: they found that UNvaccinated people are MORE likely to have car crashes. Based on this statistical finding, they urge people to vaccinate to avoid car crashes!

But…

Guess who is more likely to get into a car crash? That’s right, the person who drives to work daily, as opposed to a remote worker.

And…

The Unvaccinated Could not Take Trains or Fly in Canada

So they had to drive more.

Oh, one more thing…

Turns out that people over 65, who do NOT drive to work, are the ONLY group where vaccination leads to a slightly higher chance of car crashes for the vaccinated (without reaching statistical significance).

This outcome is the OPPOSITE of what happened to employed people:

So we can see that the conclusion that “unvaccinated people are more likely to be hurt in crashes” is explained by the fact that “essential workers” who drive to work were the ones choosing not to get vaccinated!

So… It is not the COVID vaccine that reduces the chances of having a crash. It is a fact that staying home with warm coffee and a laptop is safer than commuting to work or driving a truck. The effect does NOT exist in old people who do not work.

Igor Chudov

Professor Norman Fenton: “A Study In Stupidity

Also: Dr. Claire Craig | Mr. Law, Health and Technology1Caveat: this is little more than an ad homenim piece, but does highlight a tendency toward bias among the study group.

  • 1
    Caveat: this is little more than an ad homenim piece, but does highlight a tendency toward bias among the study group.

Two Cardiologists, Two Countries, Separate Analyses, Same Conclusion

COVID-19 Vaccines are Not Safe for the Heart

… the general public and doctors don’t know what’s really happening; and they don’t even know that they don’t know.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra (1:37:00)

Nov 29, Dallas, Texas Drs. McCullough and Malhotra spoke about:

  • manipulated virus
  • military style approach
  • deceptive use of science and data.1E.g. Relative Risk vs Absolute Risk.
  • regulatory, media and political capture
  • censorship and being attacked
  • Pfizer and Moderna’s original trials showed greater risk of harm from injection than of catching COVID…

… I was cautious during the early months of the vaccine campaign but as the deaths accrued shortly after injection I could not remain silent by the late winter of 2021.  Dr. Malhotra in his presentation painfully describes his journey of emotional distraught, losing his father and last remaining first-degree family member, and then his relentless pursuit of the truth culminating in the publication of a pair of analyses concluding all COVID-19 vaccinations are not sufficiently safe nor effective to remain in use today… Together we have hundreds of published scientific reports and opinions.  We have delivered thousands of lectures and speeches.   We both have suffered professional retaliation for telling the truth.   We are not wrong about these conclusions.

Dr. Peter McCullough

Dr. McCullough’s slides (.pptx) | Senate Hearing he mentioned

Dr. Malhotra’s slides (.pdf) |

Dr. Malhotra’s papers

Malhotra, A. (2022). Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 1. Journal of Insulin Resistance, 5(1), 8 pages. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/jir.v5i1.71

Malhotra, A. (2022). Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 2. Journal of Insulin Resistance, 5(1), 10 pages. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/jir.v5i1.72

  • 1
    E.g. Relative Risk vs Absolute Risk.