Prevention and Early Treatment Guide for COVID-19

from the Canadian Covid Care Alliance

Although I am a vaccinologist, I recognized early on that there were effective alternatives to vaccines. What brought this to my attention most was the emergence of incredibly poorly designed clinical trials that started to counter the promising evidence. These trials appeared to me to have been designed to fail. That prompted me to do a deep dive into the literature…

 I was impressed with the work that many talented physicians had done in repurposing arrays of largely generic drugs and supplements into prophylactic and early treatment strategies…

… preventative and early treatment strategies have become highly refined over the past several years. In the interest of promoting optimal health for my readership, I am pleased to share with you the CCCA’s highly refined “Prevention and Early Treatment Guide for COVID-19”…

A high-quality seven-minute video can be found here.

Dr. Byram W. Bridle

Watch on Rumble

Download the guide here.

June 2022: Moderna CMO believes spikes from the mRNA vaccine get to the heart

But Dr. Paul Burton still has his job.

In contrast, after this short May 2021 radio interview…

… and publishing a Parent Guide to COVID-19 Vaccination

My life exploded into a storm of harassment, accusations, and censorship…

… fact checkers claiming that I did not know what I was talking about…

An open letter was written by a large number of my colleagues at the University of Guelph, none of whom are vaccinologists.1Context: Dr. Bridle is an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology in the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph. All of them accused me of spreading misinformation…

My career has suffered what will likely be irreparable damage. I am still not allowed to access my office or laboratory… 

I wonder if the naysayers will listen to the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ manufacturers as they now confirm this 1.5-year-old message.

Dr. Byram Bridle

A Citizens’ Hearing

Thought I was abreast of things. But missed this 3-day Canadian event.

June 22-24: lawyers, doctors, surgeons, professors journalists, family members, injection injured, indigenous, business owners, elected representatives, fired professionals (including Pfizer trial whistleblower Brook Jackson)… began the “historic documentation of Canadians negatively impacted by government responses to COVID-19

… we encourage you to consider the decisions you might have made, were you in these individuals’ shoes. How different would your life be, if you would have been confronted by their situations and had to face the challenges each of them faced as a result of their choices?

How moderator Trish Wood saw it:

Continue reading A Citizens’ Hearing


An excellent new campaign from the Canadian COVID Care Alliance.1See also More Harm Than Good.

Of note in the video is their highlighting the case of Maddie De Garay – a stark warning for parents. Slides from video, parents brochure and letter to officials also available.

Deanna McLeod gave an overview of this initiative to the World Council For Health General Assembly on July 11th.

More Harm Than Good

If you have faith in Covid ‘vaccines’ – and those pushing them, then this piece by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is going to shake that faith.

Your faith in the media is likely to be rattled too. Because they’re ignoring all this – while unquestioningly giving voice to those who insist we “trust the science”.

Anyone trusting this kind of science, and its perpetrators, promoters and apologists needs to ask themselves some serious questions.

Brace yourself for:

  • sneaky sophistry1subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
  • more deaths in inoculated group
  • more adverse events in inoculated group
  • dodgy demographic design2e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented
  • trial unblinded after just 2 months, so long-term safety can never be determined
  • inappropriate endpoints chosen
  • reduction in transmission of Covid never tested for
  • not all participants were tested for Covid
  • 80 participants were “lost to follow up”
  • under powered trial for 12-15 year olds
  • horrific outcomes for 12 year old participant Maddie de Garay misrepresented
  • downplaying impact of myocarditis
  • FDA want 50+ years to release >300,000 pages of data
  • 84% of the authors have conflicts of interest
  • CDC changed the definition of vaccine, accommodating these injections…

Here’s a video summary:

Here’s the PDF. Click the gear icon for Presentation (Fullscreen), Download and other options.

Thanks to Steve Kirsch for highlighting this stunning piece of work.

Well done Canadian Covid Care Alliance!

  • 1
    subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
  • 2
    e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented