A computer model claims they prevented 3 million American deaths and almost 19 million hospitalizations. Imagine what they would have done if they actually WORKED against Omicron…
… in the interests of science – as opposed to The Science – I will demolish this absurdity in three minutes or less.
passing off a model as evidence is tantamount to lying…
remember this?
so, if it does backfit and your major parameter assumption is wrong, it means the whole rest of your model is garbage.
… it’s pure GIGO1Garbage In, Garbage Out and the minute you assumed “vaccines worked well” then “vaccines saved huge numbers of lives” will pop out.
but if this assumption is wrong (as it appears so clearly to have been in the israeli palestine natural experiment comparison where death rates in the two places were near indistinguishable both before and after vaccination despite wide divergence in vaxx rate) then you’ve just “proven” nothing at all apart from the fact that models express the assumptions of the modeler.
VAERS = Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System1“… put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% (read more about underreporting in VAERS) of vaccine injuries. OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data available for download at vaers.hhs.gov” OpenVAERS.com | AE = Adverse Events
Using a single keyword: ‘sudden’, I was able to pull out 13,752 adverse event reports and of these, 2,052 died.
80% of the individuals who submitted reports of sudden adverse events had no current illnesses at the time of their injection. 77% of individuals who died with an associated sudden onset adverse event had no current illnesses at the time of injection. In some cases, it was actually noted that the person was as healthy as a horse at the time of injection…
The timeframes between injection and adverse events look like this:
And for the subset of people of died:
…
The most reported adverse event associated with ‘sudden’ … is Arthralgia (joint pain) and for death, is Sudden death… interesting that in the top 10 in general, Sudden hearing loss comes up and Dizziness as well…
The [‘Canaadian crash study’] authors are not mincing words: they found that UNvaccinated people are MORE likely to have car crashes. Based on this statistical finding, they urge people to vaccinate to avoid car crashes!
But…
Guess who is more likely to get into a car crash? That’s right, the person who drives to work daily, as opposed to a remote worker.
And…
The Unvaccinated Could not Take Trains or Fly in Canada
So they had to drive more.
Oh, one more thing…
Turns out that people over 65, who do NOT drive to work, are the ONLY group where vaccination leads to a slightly higher chance of car crashes for the vaccinated (without reaching statistical significance).
This outcome is the OPPOSITE of what happened to employed people:
So we can see that the conclusion that “unvaccinated people are more likely to be hurt in crashes” is explained by the fact that “essential workers” who drive to work were the ones choosing not to get vaccinated!
So… It is not the COVID vaccine that reduces the chances of having a crash. It is a fact that staying home with warm coffee and a laptop is safer than commuting to work or driving a truck. The effect does NOT exist in old people who do not work.
A better summary than mine of the Heidelberg autopsy study.
Our authorities claim that “myocarditis does not cause deaths” for only one reason: they refused to autopsy vaccine victims. As soon as autopsies of a representative sample of “sudden deaths” were finally done, as in the above Heidelberg study, it turned out that 20% of sudden deaths were myocarditis-related.
Here’s the list of “causes of death” for most of these subjects. Thanks to Brian Mowrey for pointing it out. A lot of them deserve their own substack post!!! Look at sudden-onset pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, thrombi etc…
Here, we describe the cardiac autopsy findings in five persons who have died unexpectedly within seven days following anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination, with vaccine-induced myocardial inflammation representing the likely or possible cause of death. Our findings establish the histological phenotype of lethal vaccination-associated myocarditis.
This a small study: 5 out of 25 people who died unexpectedly within 20 days of a COVID-19 injection. But hard to dismiss as coincidental given the mounting evidence1e.g this, this, this, all this and that the authors reported:
During the last 20 years of autopsy service at Heidelberg University Hospital we did not observe comparable myocardial inflammatory infiltration. This was validated by histological re-evaluation of age- and sex-matched cohorts from three independent periods, which did not reveal a single case showing a comparable cardiac pathology….
… compelling evidence of causation… autoimmune-like inflammation and organ damage… common blood clotting-related adverse events… such as strokes, heart attacks and lung embolisms…
The question that now remains is to quantify the extent of the damage so far. Although there is increased recognition of the more immediate damage (such as myocarditis), we have serious concerns about the ongoing excess mortality we are observing, and morbidity trends in the longer term, such as neurological disorders, cancers and auto-immune disorders. For this reason, we decided to launch the V-damage project to measure and monitor this phenomenon… The majority of individuals and their institutions will have strong resistance to a “mea culpa” moment, and this brings us first to the dilemma of the vaccinated.
… vaccinated individuals (the majority of the population!) will be confronted with a dilemma: Either they A) face reality and go through the phases of grief associated with such realisations or; B) try to ignore reality and hope for the best. Let’s expand on the two options of the dilemma:
The information is slowly coming to the surface as serious questions are finally being asked in Parliament. But only after 12 billion doses have been administered worldwide, and excess deaths continue climbing at an alarming rate.
Doctors Charles Hoffe, Stephen Malthouse, Christopher Shaw + guest doctor William Makis… discuss the mysterious sudden deaths of 80+ Canadian doctors and the rapid turbo cancers they are seeing in patients… deleted death data, smear campaigns, case studies and more.
The latest evidence comes in a study from Switzerland, which found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people, with 2.8% showing levels associated with subclinical myocarditis.
An article replete with examples and references. Hard to pick highlights. But the 13-min Dr. Vinay Prasad video (near end of article) provides an overview.
There’s also these:
1. Australia as control
The official line on elevated heart injuries and deaths, where they are acknowledged, is that they are most likely caused by the virus as a post-Covid condition rather than the vaccines.
However, expert group HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has pointed to Australia as a “control group” on this question. HART notes that even though Australia had not had significant Covid (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-Covid deaths beginning in June 2021 (see below). HART notes that Australia “did not have prior Covid as a reason for seeing this rise in mortality and hospital pressure from spring 2021”. Instead, “the results from this control group indicate that the cause of this rise in deaths, particularly in young people, must be something in common with Australia, Europe and the USA”
Mathematician Igor Chudov recently talked with Naomi Wolf about the precipitous decline in birth rates nine months after mRNA COVID injections rolled out. In several countries.
As he points out, correlation does not prove causation – but it is a signal.
CDC’s own presentation shows that being given a higher-dose Moderna vaccine during pregnancy, almost DOUBLES the chance of neonatal death, compared to women who received the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine.
How can Covid vaccine given during pregnancy be safe and NOT affect infant deaths, if infant death rate for Moderna-inoculated women is double the infant death level for Pfizer-inoculated women and the difference is statistically significant?
Roy Butler (23) from Waterford died five days post Janssen vaccine.117th Aug, 2021 The Janssen vaccine is the ‘one shot’ Covid 19 vaccine manufactured by Johnson and Johnson.
The process of preparing an inquest into his death requires specific information from Janssen but this has not been forthcoming…
It is unlikely the inquest will be held, before Coroner Phillip Comyn, until 2023 at the earliest.
It’s just another one of a few hundred similar statistical coincidences.
… Same time period, same state, same cohort. Twice as many excess deaths after the introduction of a novel, still experimental medical intervention.
… even more weird is that the weekly excess deaths only really spike in mid-July, almost exactly 5 months after the experiment begins and follow a remarkably similar distribution pattern
(Note: He didn’t remark on it but Smalley’s Texas chart also shows the same ‘trending upwards and not returning to baseline’ pattern that has been highlighted by others).
Steve Kirsch cites several others who have also found time-lag patterns (in both US and UK data).
I don’t like linking to platforms that endanger lives by censoring data and medical opinion. But I’m not aware of Dr. John Campbell publishing anywhere else… and this info needs to get out.
(Plus, in my humble opinion, this is a masterful display of how to communicate without tripping the censorship algorithms. Wonder if they’ll start censoring silence, tone-of-voice and/or facial expressions next?!)
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
