Uninformed Consent, the documentary

Here is the full 2-hour 9-minute film 1Courtesy of Librti.com – a joint production partner along with Vaccine Choice Canada and Children’s Health Defense.

Short on time?

This 8-minute introduction includes a trailer.2President of Vaccine Choice Canada, Ted Kuntz introducing the movie to the WCH assembly of July 25th

Continue reading Uninformed Consent, the documentary

Updated booster is medical quackery

By definition.

Quackery is an old term, involving dishonest or confused persons selling treatments that are untested and are not working

[citing wikipedia] “Common elements of general quackery include questionable diagnoses using questionable diagnostic tests, as well as untested or refuted treatments.”

Everything checks out, right? Questionable tests, untested and known-not-to-work treatments, describe Covid response and Covid vaccines perfectly.

Igor Chudov

Mass Formation: A Decoy for Digital Concentration Camps

I was a fan of the ‘mass formation’ analysis. Not so much after this.

The Breggin critique took away my comfort blanket. Behind which I’d been avoiding looking at the evil running the show.

It’s time to face it.

Catherine Austin Fitts talked with Peter Breggin about some of the flaws with Mattias Desmet’s work – and its dangers.

Prefer reading? Links to the three-part critique on Solari.com. There’s also this piece by Ulrike Granögger.

Support vaccine mandates?

“Look these people in the eyes and tell them…”

I strongly encourage you to watch this video and share it with everyone you know.

But you must be forewarned. The imagery is emotionally disturbing, so prepare yourself. However, we need to start looking at reality with eyes wide open…

The victims’ struggle, their pain, their deaths deserve to be acknowledged…

Dr. Joseph Mercola

Complicit in the coercion?

Continue reading Support vaccine mandates?

More mask mischief

The ScienceTM just can’t help itself. Despite the glaringly obvious.

There is a new systematic review of 1732 mask studies to determine whether masks work. It is on a preprint server meaning it is not peer-reviewed.

Almost all of the 1732 potential studies were eliminated so they only looked at 13 studies with a total of 243 COVID infections between the two groups.

One of the 13 studies that was not eliminated was done in 2004 which is impressive since SARS-CoV-2 didn’t exist at the time.

From that, they conclude that masks provide nearly a 90% risk reduction of getting infected.

That is preposterous.

Steve Kirsch

More on masks: Tom Woods | Ian Miller1He’s done several mask articles | Swiss Policy Research2Direct link to aerosol demo video.

Still trust mask science?

Then try the Covid Charts Quiz.

Yes, the charts are pre-injections, so it is dated. But if they are effective you should still be able to spot the influence of masks (and lockdowns).

Shouldn’t you?