Hearing from the vaccine injured

Amputee Alex Mitchell and POTS1Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome – racing heart upon change of body posture sufferer John Watt both featured in “Safe & Effective: A Second Opinion“.

They spoke recently with Norman Fenton about life with their COVID-19 vaccine-injuries.

What is clear from the interview is that the Government and Pharma funded campaign to ensure that the main stream media silenced any news of vaccine injuries was extremely effective and ultimately deadly… Alex and John felt they were doing their duty in taking the vaccine and were unaware of any of the voices of those either warning of the dangers or discussing actual injuries. If they had heard these voices they would not have taken the vaccine. Alex’s devastating injuries from the AstraZeneca vaccine happened long before John took the Pfizer booster that caused his injuries. As [John] says, if he had heard about Alex’s experience in the Scottish press he would not have taken that booster. But Alex, and then John, were never given a platform to warn others.

Please help ensure as many people as possible hear the story of the injuries and their appalling experiences since.

Norman Fenton

This interview is also on Rumble and Bitchute.

Safe & Effective: A Second Opinion is subtitled in multiple languages on OracleFilms.com

  • 1
    Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome – racing heart upon change of body posture

In case you thought getting more shots was a good idea…

Being Up-to-Date On COVID Vaccines Increases Chances of Covid by 33%, Cleveland Clinic Study Show

A new preprint is out entitled: “Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Those Up-to-Date and Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccination” … concludes from a multivariate analysis of 48,344 individuals (Employees of Cleveland Clinic) that ‘those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”’.

I can already hear the hit piece vultures circling and chanting: it’s not peer-reviewed. No it’s not, but read it anyway and ask yourself if this study has merit. Decide for yourself. Maybe my summary can help…

… they accounted for the fact that injection status can change per individual at any time (injection time), and at each injection (event) time, that current status of the individual is compared with the current values of all others who were at risk of COVID-19 at that time.

So they collected and compared two rates: incidence rate for ‘up-to-date’ and ‘not-up-to-date’…

… the risk of getting COVID-19 is lower if you are not up-to-date (red). As time progressed (from the end of January 2023), the disparity between the two groups becomes more apparent.

Jessica Rose

The study’s authors did an excellent job of weeding out confounding variables. For example, could it be that Covid-conscious, vaccine-loving people test for Covid more often? The following chart answers this question: while the propensity to test somewhat affects the likelihood of getting a positive test, it does not explain the difference.

The authors also point out that their results are not confounded by age. However, in a disturbing finding, the female sex is associated with a 24% higher chance of a COVID infection among the vaccinated people

Igor Chudov

Full articles on ‘the Cleveland Study’ by Jessica Rose and Igor Chudov.

Cardiac Episodes in Young Australians Explode Due to the mRNA Experiment

Thousands of young people, including children and babies are affected

According to information released as a result of a freedom of information request (because the public health authorities wouldn’t publish it otherwise)1, there has been an explosion of serious cardiac episodes in Australia since April 2021…

… disproportionally affecting young people, with emergency department presentations for 10 to 29 year olds almost doubling over the period March 2021 to Feb 2022…

Joel Smalley

Full article on Joel Smalley’s Substack.

The Once Elusive Vaccine Debate Goes Mainstream

Key proponents of vaccines won’t debate with sceptics – tending to withdraw at the last minute.

They also seem unable to cite or defend the ‘settled science’ in courtrooms.

Could it be because…

No studies have ever compared the total health outcomes of the CDC’s vaccine schedule between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. No system is in place or body of scientific investigation in the books to assess who may be more susceptible to adverse reactions to preempt injuries…

Jefferey Jaxen

Jaxen’s article on the issue will tell you more.

Connecticut: Mom Of Teen Son Speaks After He Suffers Heart Condition Days After COVID-19 Vaccine

Correlation doesn’t prove causation so we can all safely dismiss these issues as mere coincidences. They’re nothing to worry about.1Sarcasm.

“I wouldn’t want any other parent to go through what we’ve been through,” said Rachel Hatton, after her 17-year-old son was diagnosed with a heart condition days after receiving the COVID vaccine.”

At least 18 teens and young adults in Connecticut have shown symptoms of heart problems after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, acting health commissioner Dr. Deirdre Gifford said Monday…

Hatton said her son started complaining of severe chest pain three days after his second dose. It worsened on the fourth day and led to back pain…

NBC Connecticut
  • 1
    Sarcasm.