In his latest, stats guy Joel Smalley highlights yet another ‘black swan’ – and reminds us of two others he’s previously covered: The Amish and Palau.
This little island off the coast of the UK managed to dodge the deadliest pandemic since the “Spanish flu” completely…
Curiously though, even though allegedly representing more than 1 in 5 deaths at its peak in April 2020, COVID didn’t make a blind bit of difference to the island’s overall mortality, not even in that month…
Even more curiously, Isle of Man’s COVID death toll itself was almost four times higher after the roll out of the “vaccine” that was supposed to save everyone from a COVID death – mysteriously, only really taking off, rather unseasonably, in the middle of summer 2021, more than a year after this deadly epidemic first emerged…
Amputee Alex Mitchell and POTS1Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome – racing heart upon change of body posture sufferer John Watt both featured in “Safe & Effective: A Second Opinion“.
They spoke recently with Norman Fenton about life with their COVID-19 vaccine-injuries.
What is clear from the interview is that the Government and Pharma funded campaign to ensure that the main stream media silenced any news of vaccine injuries was extremely effective and ultimately deadly… Alex and John felt they were doing their duty in taking the vaccine and were unaware of any of the voices of those either warning of the dangers or discussing actual injuries. If they had heard these voices they would not have taken the vaccine. Alex’s devastating injuries from the AstraZeneca vaccine happened long before John took the Pfizer booster that caused his injuries. As [John] says, if he had heard about Alex’s experience in the Scottish press he would not have taken that booster. But Alex, and then John, were never given a platform to warn others.
Please help ensure as many people as possible hear the story of the injuries and their appalling experiences since.
I can already hear the hit piece vultures circling and chanting: it’s not peer-reviewed. No it’s not, but read it anyway and ask yourself if this study has merit. Decide for yourself. Maybe my summary can help…
… they accounted for the fact that injection status can change per individual at any time (injection time), and at each injection (event) time, that current status of the individual is compared with the current values of all others who were at risk of COVID-19 at that time.
So they collected and compared two rates: incidence rate for ‘up-to-date’ and ‘not-up-to-date’…
… the risk of getting COVID-19 is lower if you are not up-to-date (red). As time progressed (from the end of January 2023), the disparity between the two groups becomes more apparent.
The study’s authors did an excellent job of weeding out confounding variables. For example, could it be that Covid-conscious, vaccine-loving people test for Covid more often? The following chart answers this question: while the propensity to test somewhat affects the likelihood of getting a positive test, it does not explain the difference.
The authors also point out that their results are not confounded by age. However, in a disturbing finding, the female sex is associated with a 24% higher chance of a COVID infection among the vaccinated people…
Thousands of young people, including children and babies are affected
According to information released as a result of a freedom of information request (because the public health authorities wouldn’t publish it otherwise)1, there has been an explosion of serious cardiac episodes in Australia since April 2021…
… disproportionally affecting young people, with emergency department presentations for 10 to 29 year olds almost doubling over the period March 2021 to Feb 2022…
Key proponents of vaccines won’t debate with sceptics – tending to withdraw at the last minute.
They also seem unable to cite or defend the ‘settled science’ in courtrooms.
Could it be because…
No studies have ever compared the total health outcomes of the CDC’s vaccine schedule between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. No system is in place or body of scientific investigation in the books to assess who may be more susceptible to adverse reactions to preempt injuries…
Correlation doesn’t prove causation so we can all safely dismiss these issues as mere coincidences. They’re nothing to worry about.1Sarcasm.
“I wouldn’t want any other parent to go through what we’ve been through,” said Rachel Hatton, after her 17-year-old son was diagnosed with a heart condition days after receiving the COVID vaccine.”
To provide the best experience, Oisin.Page uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies allows processing of data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, might affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
