“I hope I am wrong. I fear I am right.”

The words of one of the early developers of mRNA vaccines, Robert Malone after digesting a report from a life insurance company.

A seasoned stock analyst colleague texted me a link today, and when I clicked it open, I could hardly believe what I was reading.  What a headline.  “Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64”.  This headline is a nuclear truth bomb masquerading as an insurance agent’s dry manila envelope full of actuarial tables.

Robert W Malone

Is this a sign of the massive vaccine-induced death toll some have been predicting?

Read Malone’s concerns here.1If you are outside the USA you may not be able to read the article he links to. .

Jessica Rose goes into more detail about the numbers here.

Steve Kirsch is aware of the news but is WAY less cautious in his interpretation than Malone – and has a plan.

  • 1
    If you are outside the USA you may not be able to read the article he links to.

Vitamin D story shows (yet again) that this is not about health

News of safe and effective medications and supplements is being blocked or hampered. Those who champion them are too. So the public aren’t learning about hudroxychloroquin, ivermectin, fluvoxamine, zinc, quercetin, vitamin C… or other things that could help end the pandemic.

We can add Vitamin D to the hampered list too.

Dr. Gareth “Gruff” Davies and Dr. Linda Benskin recently talked with Bret Weinstein on The Darkhorse Podcast about their experience trying to share the good news about Vitamin D. Their efforts, backed by 220 well-qualified signatories,, has been ignored worldwide.

For over a year.

Listening to their experience of censorship, double-standards, shoddy counter studies, editorial interference and more it is hard to believe that the never-ending Covid chaos is merely down to incompetence.

Listening to Weinstein calmly acknowledging he’d been wrong about Vitamin D and is now less dumb than he used to be, I find myself wishing other scientists, public health officials and ministers would display the same integrity and humility.

The pandemic would be over in days.

More Harm Than Good

If you have faith in Covid ‘vaccines’ – and those pushing them, then this piece by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is going to shake that faith.

Your faith in the media is likely to be rattled too. Because they’re ignoring all this – while unquestioningly giving voice to those who insist we “trust the science”.

Anyone trusting this kind of science, and its perpetrators, promoters and apologists needs to ask themselves some serious questions.

Brace yourself for:

  • sneaky sophistry1subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
  • more deaths in inoculated group
  • more adverse events in inoculated group
  • dodgy demographic design2e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented
  • trial unblinded after just 2 months, so long-term safety can never be determined
  • inappropriate endpoints chosen
  • reduction in transmission of Covid never tested for
  • not all participants were tested for Covid
  • 80 participants were “lost to follow up”
  • under powered trial for 12-15 year olds
  • horrific outcomes for 12 year old participant Maddie de Garay misrepresented
  • downplaying impact of myocarditis
  • FDA want 50+ years to release >300,000 pages of data
  • 84% of the authors have conflicts of interest
  • CDC changed the definition of vaccine, accommodating these injections…

Here’s a video summary:

Here’s the PDF. Click the gear icon for Presentation (Fullscreen), Download and other options.

Thanks to Steve Kirsch for highlighting this stunning piece of work.

Well done Canadian Covid Care Alliance!

  • 1
    subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
  • 2
    e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented

Jessica Rose

Someone I wish I’d come across sooner. PhDs in Molecular Biology and Biochemistry… coder… surfer… with a sense of humour (which has gotta help her cope with the horrors she’s seeing in the VAERS data).

You can subscribe to her writing on Substack and here’s her interview with Dr. Joseph Mercola from December 17th.1Originally posted on Banned.video

Mercola highlights:

  • The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is among the best adverse event data collection systems in the world, but it’s antiquated and difficult to use. Still, it’s a good way to detect safety signals that weren’t detected during premarket testing or clinical trials
  • There are unmistakable, unprecedented safety signals in VAERS for the COVID shots. While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claim no deaths can be attributed to the COVID jabs, it’s impossible to discount 8,986 deaths in the U.S. territories alone, reported as of November 26, 2021
  • The estimated underreporting factor for COVID jab injuries in VAERS is between 31 and 100, so the actual death toll in the U.S. could be anywhere from 278,500 to 898,600
  • There’s a strong safety signal for female reproductive issues and for heart inflammation (myocarditis) in young men and boys. VAERS data show an inverse relationship between myocarditis and age, with youths being more frequently affected than older men
  • VAERS data are being deleted without explanation. Each week, about 100 or so reports are routinely deleted, so there are now thousands of inexplicably missing reports

“Please do not donate to Wikipedia”…

… asks Steve Kirsch.

Because they changed him from a good person to a bad one – and wouldn’t even talk to him when he challenged their edits.

He spells it out here, making use of the fabulous “Wayback Machine” to highlight some of their key moves.

He also points out that even Larry Sanger, a co-founder of Wikipedia, says we can trust it… to give the establishment point of view. In other words, propaganda.

Maybe donate to The Wayback Machine instead?!

Jabbed, but blaming the vaccine-free for your illness?

Then that means YOU are the ‘anti-vaxxer’… because it shows you don’t believe the vaccine works!

Lets flip this Anti-vaxxer status thing!
If you have been tripple juiced and Still think the unvaxxed will make you sick, you are an anti-vaxxer. You don’t believe the vaccine works!

@SWMarelise on twitter1Wayback Machine link in case twitter remove the post.r

  • 1
    Wayback Machine link in case twitter remove the post.

The COVID-19 Fraud & War On Humanity

On November 11th Dr. Mark Bailey and Dr. John Bevan-Smith published a thorough exposé of the global deception, covering:

  • the “double deception” sustaining the illusion of a virus1“The COVID-19 crime against humanity requires the absence of this virus so there is no material reference against which the make-believe genome can be cross-checked, to establish, for instance, whether or not the purported SARS-CoV-2 proteins specifically stem from the alleged virus.”
  • the (dodgy) virology studies from various institutions
  • some of the key (pro-vaccine) players funding them
  • the (inappropriately used) PCR test
  • the (inaccurate) modelling of outbreaks
  • the (strange) objects pathologists have found in deceased jab recipients
  • the (liability-free) deals government made with vaccine producers…

In these two videos Dr. Sam Bailey summarises their work. You can download or read the original paper on her website.

  • 1
    “The COVID-19 crime against humanity requires the absence of this virus so there is no material reference against which the make-believe genome can be cross-checked, to establish, for instance, whether or not the purported SARS-CoV-2 proteins specifically stem from the alleged virus.”