Tag: Steve Kirsch

Three vaccine injured people…

… Angelia Desselle, Shawn Skelton and mother of 6 year old Milo discuss their injuries with double-jabbed Steve Kirsch on a Vaccine Safety Research Foundation weekly call.

The earlier minutes also give some background on how Steve Kirsch and Dr. Robert Malone both ‘woke up’ at around the same time.

A Substack by Dr. Pierre Kory is also mentioned. Here it is. He points out the CDC are now, finally, encouraging early treatment for Covid-19… just when some new, expensive drugs come out.

“I hope I am wrong. I fear I am right.”

The words of one of the early developers of mRNA vaccines, Robert Malone after digesting a report from a life insurance company.

A seasoned stock analyst colleague texted me a link today, and when I clicked it open, I could hardly believe what I was reading.  What a headline.  “Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64”.  This headline is a nuclear truth bomb masquerading as an insurance agent’s dry manila envelope full of actuarial tables.

Robert W Malone

Is this a sign of the massive vaccine-induced death toll some have been predicting?

Read Malone’s concerns here.1If you are outside the USA you may not be able to read the article he links to. .

Jessica Rose goes into more detail about the numbers here.

Steve Kirsch is aware of the news but is WAY less cautious in his interpretation than Malone – and has a plan.

  • 1
    If you are outside the USA you may not be able to read the article he links to.

More Harm Than Good

If you have faith in Covid ‘vaccines’ – and those pushing them, then this piece by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is going to shake that faith.

Your faith in the media is likely to be rattled too. Because they’re ignoring all this – while unquestioningly giving voice to those who insist we “trust the science”.

Anyone trusting this kind of science, and its perpetrators, promoters and apologists needs to ask themselves some serious questions.

Brace yourself for:

  • sneaky sophistry1subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
  • more deaths in inoculated group
  • more adverse events in inoculated group
  • dodgy demographic design2e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented
  • trial unblinded after just 2 months, so long-term safety can never be determined
  • inappropriate endpoints chosen
  • reduction in transmission of Covid never tested for
  • not all participants were tested for Covid
  • 80 participants were “lost to follow up”
  • under powered trial for 12-15 year olds
  • horrific outcomes for 12 year old participant Maddie de Garay misrepresented
  • downplaying impact of myocarditis
  • FDA want 50+ years to release >300,000 pages of data
  • 84% of the authors have conflicts of interest
  • CDC changed the definition of vaccine, accommodating these injections…

Here’s a video summary:

Here’s the PDF. Click the gear icon for Presentation (Fullscreen), Download and other options.

Thanks to Steve Kirsch for highlighting this stunning piece of work.

Well done Canadian Covid Care Alliance!

  • 1
    subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
  • 2
    e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented

“Please do not donate to Wikipedia”…

… asks Steve Kirsch.

Because they changed him from a good person to a bad one – and wouldn’t even talk to him when he challenged their edits.

He spells it out here, making use of the fabulous “Wayback Machine” to highlight some of their key moves.

He also points out that even Larry Sanger, a co-founder of Wikipedia, says we can trust it… to give the establishment point of view. In other words, propaganda.

Maybe donate to The Wayback Machine instead?!