The Speed Of Science

One day it will gain such momentum that The ScienceTM will either vibrate itself to bits or crash, out of control into a wall made of its own hubris.

But how do we minimise the numbers it will hurt, maim or kill along the way?

Ordinarily I’d highlight specific parts of a Highwire episode. But there are too many important issues converging…

  • Paxlovid was found to cross react with common heart, statin and immunosuppressive medications
  • Boston University developed a more virulent SARS strain
  • Florida’s Surgeon General confirms greater risk of cardiac death for young men after an mRNA shot and recommends against mRNA injections for young men because of the increased risk of cardiac death and says there’s a “snowflake’s chance in hell” Florida would require COVID injections for schoolchildren
  • Joe Biden says “the pandemic is over” but his administration renews the state of emergency and the CDC’s ACIP committee voted 15:0 to pave the way to permanently protect manufacturers from liability for harms their COVID injections might cause recommend the COVID injections be added to the US childhood vaccination schedule.
  • a Pfizer executive laughed as she told the EU their COVID injection was never tested for transmission before release
  • there are signs the mRNA injections are triggering 15% more deaths than normal
  • some MEPs are calling for billions in refunds for these fake vaccines
  • The ScienceTM gets away with sophistry, word salads, lies and a coordinated, carefully-planned propaganda campaign while those calling them out are censored
  • … and some public figures who took part in that campaign have started back-pedalling. (More on that soon).1But let’s start with a question. If you disparaged those of us who knew all along that the shots were not tested for transmission and that we were all being misled about their effectiveness and harms, how credible do you think we’ll find it when you say you now believe The ScienceTM has changed?


Individual clips available on The Highwire Episode #290 page.

  • 1
    But let’s start with a question. If you disparaged those of us who knew all along that the shots were not tested for transmission and that we were all being misled about their effectiveness and harms, how credible do you think we’ll find it when you say you now believe The ScienceTM has changed?

Pfizer executive’s Freudian slip has given the vaccine game away

One week on. Legacy media silent. But multiple independent journalists have covered it. This angle stood out.

… Pfizer executive Janine Small’s incoherent answer to Dutch MEP Robert Roos began: ‘Regarding the question around did we know about stopping immunisation before it entered the market? No [laughs].’

Few seem to have noticed this apparent slip by Small. Being flustered, she may have simply used the wrong word – ‘immunisation’ rather than ‘transmission’. Arguably, she may have meant what she said.

… Covid-19 vaccines were initially presented as a double dose. Then new variants emerged, and a booster was pushed. In the UK the fifth dose is currently being offered. Is this an emergent process, responding to incidence and immunity patterns, or is it planned?

After the Pfizer vaccine came out in December 2020, the EU signed a contract with the company for an incredible 4.5billion doses. For a population of 450million, that’s ten vials per person. In the UK the then Prime Minister Boris Johnson proudly announced his pre -purchase of 350million doses – some seven each for the adult population. A further purchase of 114million doses was announced by Sajid Javid, the then Health Secretary, just one year later. 

This raises important questions. Why did the EU and the UK commit so much money to a vaccine that had not completed trials and therefore its impact on infection and transmission were unknown? Why weren’t European citizens told that they would be expected to take all of these injections?…

My inference is that Ms Small accidentally let loose the terrible truth that Pfizer does not want immunity to Covid-19. This is not a wild conspiracy theory: it is now known that repeated jabs raise the risk of infection, and that the only remaining selling point is the claimed reduction in symptoms…

Niall McCrae

Welcome To The Real World

So you just heard it from the horse’s mouth, Pfizer never tested the vaccines for reducing transmission.

… but I’m sorry to tell you it’s much worse than that…

Pfizer did test the vaccine’s ability to reduce rates of “Covid-19”. To be specific, “Covid-19” means testing positive and being symptomatic.1Which differs from what we, the people have been trained to believe Covid-19 means: testing positive. Oisín. The data looked great by the way, Pfizer had a wonderful graph to show the effect. The blue line is infections in the unvaccinated, and the red line is infections in the vaccinated.

Pfizer’s “infection reduction” published in NEJM.

But… That data you can see up there, the main argument for the vaccine passports, the vaccine mandates and all the terrifying media campaigns comes from a fraudulent study.

Continue reading Welcome To The Real World
  • 1
    Which differs from what we, the people have been trained to believe Covid-19 means: testing positive. Oisín.

That the ‘vaccines’ don’t prevent transmission is far from news

However, Pfizer admitting they never even tried to test it is news…

… from the very beginning they had no idea if their “vaccine” prevented transmission or not…

The mainstream media has gone into revisionist history mode over this news, saying that nobody ever claimed the vaccines prevented transmission.

That is a complete and utter lie.

Off-Guardian

See also:

  • 1
    Albert Bourla is CEO of Pfizer

Pfizer Exec Concedes COVID-19 Vaccine Was Not Tested on Preventing Transmission Before Release

Just like the FDA said in December 2020

At this time, data are not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection, nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person.

FDA

So why did those officials who knew…

  • remain silent while ‘the lie’ was propagated and/or
  • actively participate in spreading it?

To paraphrase Dr. Mike Yeadon… I don’t know. It’s not my crime.

Rob Roos’ question to Janine Small…

… can be seen at 15:21:30. But, be warned. You may find this hearing painful.

Continue reading Pfizer Exec Concedes COVID-19 Vaccine Was Not Tested on Preventing Transmission Before Release