Tag: Questions

The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects

Dr. Paul Alexander reminds us of the New York Times piece from February.

The headline message might cause some to question the CDC’s integrity. Potentially helpful from a freedom lovers point of view.

However, the snippet he shared also implies better control of the virus could be achieved and more lives saved if we just had more info. Which is unfortunate. But also possibly deliberate on the part of the newspaper.

Continue reading The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects

Covid Coincidence

Coincidence theorists1Those who see coincidences as merely coincidences – and not evidence of entities conspiring or systemic corruption. will probably enjoy this one.

October 2021, The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons featured an article called Covid Coincidence. In it Marilyn Singleton MD, JD asks some serious rhetorical questions.2Here’s the same article on her own website.

  • 1
    Those who see coincidences as merely coincidences – and not evidence of entities conspiring or systemic corruption.
  • 2
    Here’s the same article on her own website.

Why Have We Doctors Been Silent?

There are uncomfortable truths in this November 2021 piece by a UK doctor.

Not just uncomfortable for doctors though.

Because her insights and truths could also apply to nearly any professional.

Teachers, drivers, police, politicians, nurses, shop staff, journalists, athletes, air crew… whatever… insert your profession where she writes “doctor”, “medical community” etc.

One can see the path: we were good, compliant children and then good, compliant students. Now we are good, compliant doctors. I’m beginning to understand that goodness is measured in a different way, and obedience is not a virtue.

Obedience is learned through fear, threat and intimidation; it is in fact trauma programming and achieved through small control gestures when we were young and helpless. Now we are adults but still operating under these childhood programmes of beliefs and fears. We still feel helpless and beholden to a higher authority. We still submit to an authoritative decree even when it overrides our inherent moral compass.

Lucie Wilk

More on the dangers of obedience here.

One year on. Yet another black swan.

How many black swans are needed to destroy a hypothesis?

If you are actually scientific, just one.

Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:

However if you are a believer in Covid-19 public health policies, no amount of black swans will convince you.

So, neither the recent outbreak amongst fully jabbed and tested Antarctic researchers nor the isolated ship crew, antarctic explorers or military personnel I wrote about last year will matter to you.

You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.

Only you know why you are doing that.

My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people

Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.

Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?

No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.

But here’s another one anyhow.

This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.

  • 1
    For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people

If a tested and vaccinated group of scientists in Antarctica experience a Covid outbreak 7 days after arriving…

… and “they and others who tested positive were placed in quarantine but the virus continued to circulate“…

… what does that tell you about Covid testing, contact tracing, isolation and ‘vaccines’?

Real Science: “We thought testing would help us manage outbreaks. We thought minimising interaction and isolating close contacts would help slow the spread. We thought vaccines would stop the spread. So we would have reasonably expected that with ALL OF THEM COMBINED an outbreak would have been nearly impossible. Especially when everyone was tested before arriving on the base. But this ‘black swan’1I wrote about ‘black swans’ almost a year ago. Little did I know public health experts, Governments and media would still be ignoring them. event points to the need to face the reality that these interventions just don’t work for airborne viruses.”

Covidian Science: “Maybe the never-failed-us-until-now tests weren’t done properly? Maybe two negative ‘cases’ stood too close together and their negatives combined to create a positive, like in mathematics ?2That’s actually nonsense. But hey, I am after all trying to highlight that Covid Science is nonsensical! Maybe the scientists weren’t vaccinated enough? Maybe it was because they were so remote they got sloppy and didn’t isolate hard enough? Oh no, wait – I’ve got it! The article said nothing about masks. So clearly they weren’t masking! That’s it. The evidence is clear. Improper masking was behind the outbreak!”

Which kind of science do you follow?

Read the short news piece for yourself and decide.

In case someone realizes this story undermines ‘the narrative’ or creates ‘vaccine hesitancy’ and so takes it down, here’s a January 1st Wayback Machine version for posterity.

  • 1
    I wrote about ‘black swans’ almost a year ago. Little did I know public health experts, Governments and media would still be ignoring them.
  • 2
    That’s actually nonsense. But hey, I am after all trying to highlight that Covid Science is nonsensical!