I was in Puerto Rico last weekend to help parents understand the mRNA vaccines in regards to children. This was important because the governor of Puerto Rico, Pedro Pierluisi has mandated by executive order that children 5-11 will have to be vaccinated in order to go to school or access public places beginning January, 2021.
This video was made from that “question and answer” session about the vaccines. Of note, I learned a lot about the politics of the island, as parents educated me on the facts of these mandates. I also was witness to many terrible stories about how these vaccine mandates, masks and lock-downs are affecting our youth. The video follows what took place when Rob Nelson interviewed me in front of a diverse audience of parents, physicians, medical caregivers, and others from Puerto Rico.
I believe that this video has very powerful talking points and explanations about vaccinating with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and children.
I wish to sincerely thank Rob Nelson and all the parents who participated in this video.
Dr. Robert Malone, Dec 19th, 2021
Tag: Vaccines
Before your child is injected…
… watch Dr. Robert Malone’s statement on child COVID vaccinations
Before you vaccinate your child, which is irreversible and potentially permanently damaging, find out why 15,000 physicians and medical scientists around the world signed a declaration publicly declaring that healthy children should NOT be vaccinated for COVID-19. On behalf of these MDs and PhDs, Dr. Robert Malone, who has devoted his career to vaccine development, provides parents a clear statement outlining the scientific facts behind this decision.
Global Covid Summit (Dec 11th, 2021)
Why should I? Who is this guy Robert Malone anyhow?
One of the first to develop mRNA and DNA vaccines and a holder of nine patents in that field. Enough said I think.
But if you still want to try an ad-homenin on him (instead of testing the points raised by him and 15,000 declaration signatories) you can start looking for material on his personal website or Substack.
Until recently you could also have trawled his exchanges with his 500,000+ Twitter followers. (Seems warning people of the dangers of a medical intervention you helped develop is forbidden!)
As for his ethics… well… read this post of his1It begins with a repeat of this statement. So scroll down to “More on the twisted logic of vaccinating the children to protect the elderly” and you’ll see he’s against risking or sacrificing children’s health to save adults. Make of that what you will.
Oh and he’s had his Covid injections.
Full text of the statement is below the video.
My name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician and scientist. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.
I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I’m generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases.
After this, I will be posting the text of this statement so you can share it with your friends and family.
Before you inject your child – a decision that is irreversible – I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created:
There are three issues parents need to understand:
The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including
- Their brain and nervous system
- Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots
- Their reproductive system, and
- This vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system
The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable
- You can’t fix the lesions within their brain
- You can’t repair heart tissue scarring
- You can’t repair a genetically reset immune system, and
- This vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family
The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.
- We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks
- Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later
Ask yourself if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history
One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie.
- Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents
- It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease
In summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives.
The risk/benefit analysis isn’t even close.
As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.
The statement was delivered at a December 12 livestream event hosted by Unity Project and Global Covid Summit. Dr. Robert Malone and other leading physicians discussed their recent Physicians’ Declaration update, why healthy children should not be vaccinated and the associated risks. Read supporting evidence here.
- 1It begins with a repeat of this statement. So scroll down to “More on the twisted logic of vaccinating the children to protect the elderly”
How many life jackets do we need?
JP’s videos are funny. So are most of his ads.
Less funny though is what’s happening in our world around ‘vaccines’ (lifejackets), viruses (water) and death (drowning). It’s illogical, irrational and immoral.
JP exposes those things and more in these videos:
Continue reading How many life jackets do we need?More Harm Than Good
If you have faith in Covid ‘vaccines’ – and those pushing them, then this piece by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance is going to shake that faith.
Your faith in the media is likely to be rattled too. Because they’re ignoring all this – while unquestioningly giving voice to those who insist we “trust the science”.
Anyone trusting this kind of science, and its perpetrators, promoters and apologists needs to ask themselves some serious questions.
Brace yourself for:
- sneaky sophistry1subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
- more deaths in inoculated group
- more adverse events in inoculated group
- dodgy demographic design2e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented
- trial unblinded after just 2 months, so long-term safety can never be determined
- inappropriate endpoints chosen
- reduction in transmission of Covid never tested for
- not all participants were tested for Covid
- 80 participants were “lost to follow up”
- under powered trial for 12-15 year olds
- horrific outcomes for 12 year old participant Maddie de Garay misrepresented
- downplaying impact of myocarditis
- FDA want 50+ years to release >300,000 pages of data
- 84% of the authors have conflicts of interest
- CDC changed the definition of vaccine, accommodating these injections…
Here’s a video summary:
Here’s the PDF. Click the gear icon for Presentation (Fullscreen), Download and other options.
Thanks to Steve Kirsch for highlighting this stunning piece of work.
Well done Canadian Covid Care Alliance!
- 1subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation e.g. relative risk reduction of 95% was focused on; real-world absolute risk reduction of just 0.88% downplayed
- 2e.g. those most needing the injection (elderly & comorbid) not appropriately represented
One interview to rule them all?
There are many interviews covering the many lies, deceits, medical and moral failings around Covid… with many people of courage and integrity… but if I had to pick just one it might be this one.
Comprehensive. Authoritative.
Dr. Peter McCullough appears on The Joe Rogan Experience (JRE #1747)
Jessica Rose
Someone I wish I’d come across sooner. PhDs in Molecular Biology and Biochemistry… coder… surfer… with a sense of humour (which has gotta help her cope with the horrors she’s seeing in the VAERS data).
You can subscribe to her writing on Substack and here’s her interview with Dr. Joseph Mercola from December 17th.1Originally posted on Banned.video
Mercola highlights:
- The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is among the best adverse event data collection systems in the world, but it’s antiquated and difficult to use. Still, it’s a good way to detect safety signals that weren’t detected during premarket testing or clinical trials
- There are unmistakable, unprecedented safety signals in VAERS for the COVID shots. While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claim no deaths can be attributed to the COVID jabs, it’s impossible to discount 8,986 deaths in the U.S. territories alone, reported as of November 26, 2021
- The estimated underreporting factor for COVID jab injuries in VAERS is between 31 and 100, so the actual death toll in the U.S. could be anywhere from 278,500 to 898,600
- There’s a strong safety signal for female reproductive issues and for heart inflammation (myocarditis) in young men and boys. VAERS data show an inverse relationship between myocarditis and age, with youths being more frequently affected than older men
- VAERS data are being deleted without explanation. Each week, about 100 or so reports are routinely deleted, so there are now thousands of inexplicably missing reports
- 1Originally posted on Banned.video
Jabbed, but blaming the vaccine-free for your illness?
Then that means YOU are the ‘anti-vaxxer’… because it shows you don’t believe the vaccine works!
Lets flip this Anti-vaxxer status thing!
@SWMarelise on twitter1Wayback Machine link in case twitter remove the post.r
If you have been tripple juiced and Still think the unvaxxed will make you sick, you are an anti-vaxxer. You don’t believe the vaccine works!
- 1Wayback Machine link in case twitter remove the post.
Would you know it?
Some folks wouldn’t know tyranny if it
Masked their face
Sev Kirian
Locked them in their home prison
Enacted biggest wealth transfer in history (anti Robin Hood steal from poor give to rich)
Censored them
Made them show their papers
& forced fed them Gene Therapy masquerading as vaccines
Get jabbed or starve
In yet another example of “not forcing you, just taking everything away until you comply”… Canadians are now being told by their leaders that it’s ok to deprive other people of food.
No doubt some who have already taken the officially sanctioned gene therapy will offer to shop for the unjabbed. That might seem kind. But wouldn’t it have been kinder to stand in solidarity with the unjabbed before it came to this? Or at least NOW boycott those venues implementing the governments wishes?
Because, when you consider how government policy is to clearly to force injections on everyone, if there isn’t massive pushback and non-compliance NOW it won’t be long until helping the unjabbed will be deemed a criminal act.
How many currently offering to shop for the unjabbed will risk the government approved shaming, fines and prosecution?
Very few I would imagine.
18 reasons plus 17 more
In April 2021 Christian Elliot wrote “18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a Covid Vaccine“. In October he followed up with “17 More Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a Covid Vaccine”
If someone HAS TO come up with 35 reasons why they don’t want a medical intervention, what does that tell you about the climate they’re living in?
If someone IS ABLE TO come up with 35 reasons why they won’t be taking a medical intervention, what does that tell you about that medical intervention?
If someone in favour of these ‘vaccines’ CAN’T REFUTE each of those 35 reasons, why should they be given any credibility or authority on the matter?