The state of science

Is appalling.

When it comes to COVID ‘vaccines’ at any rate.

I have already highlighted the horror of how they justified injecting 6-months to 4yr-olds. So for the sake of completeness here’s one brief overview of last months FDA announcement of a third COVID shot for 5-11yr-olds.

“Safe…”

For starters, the safety of the now authorized booster dose was assessed “in approximately 400 children” for a limited timeframe.

Jeffrey Jaxen

That represents weak safety data – at best. Because if the injection were going to cause myocarditis or thrombosis or other harm to 1 in 450 recipients, it is not likely to be picked up.

Something even rarer, like killing 1 in 1,000 recipients, would be even less likely to be noticed.1Mind you, even if something dangerous were picked up, Maddie de Garay’s experience suggests it would be covered up anyhow.

What makes it even weaker is the ‘limited timeframe‘. Which means we don’t know if harms are likely to show up after three, six, twelve, eighteen months or longer.

“… and effective”

… also underwhelms by stating that the efficacy, which couldn’t possibly be questioned by experts, looked at a measly 67 study participants.

“The antibody level against the SARS-CoV-2 virus one month after the booster dose was increased compared to before the booster dose.” states the FDA.

One month!?!? What happens after two months? We’ll just have to wait and see I guess. 

Jeffrey Jaxen

Let’s overlook the small sample size there and ask some obvious questions.

Do increased antibodies actually mean one will never get COVID? Looking at the multiple-injected adults repeatedly getting COVID, we can probably assume “no” is the answer. But even if the answer were “yes”…

… by how much do antibodies need to increase to protect you from…

  • … developing symptoms? 5%? 25%? 50%? 100%? 200%? 500%?2Surely The ScienceTM has this all worked out, right?
  • … hospitalization? 5%? 25%? 50%? 100%? 200%? 500%?3Surely The ScienceTM has this all worked out, right?
  • … requiring ICU care? 5%? 25%? 50%? 100%? 200%? 500%?4Surely The ScienceTM has this all worked out, right?
  • … death? 5%? 25%? 50%? 100%? 200%? 500%?5Surely The ScienceTM has this all worked out, right?
  • 1
    Mind you, even if something dangerous were picked up, Maddie de Garay’s experience suggests it would be covered up anyhow.
  • 2
    Surely The ScienceTM has this all worked out, right?
  • 3
    Surely The ScienceTM has this all worked out, right?
  • 4
    Surely The ScienceTM has this all worked out, right?
  • 5
    Surely The ScienceTM has this all worked out, right?