How many black swans are needed to destroy a hypothesis?
If you are actually scientific, just one.
Ivor Cummins explains this in five minutes during a recent talk with Irish nurses:
However if you are a believer in Covid-19 public health policies, no amount of black swans will convince you.
So, neither the recent outbreak amongst fully jabbed and tested Antarctic researchers nor the isolated ship crew, antarctic explorers or military personnel I wrote about last year will matter to you.
You will just ignore, deny or dismiss them and carry on believing the official story.
Only you know why you are doing that.
My guess is that it’s because, deep down in your core, you know acknowledging the black swans means acknowledging the official public health story is deliberately deceptive – and that you fell for it.1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people
Plus, along with that admission comes something far, far worse. The realisation that if the globally coordinated official story and government actions are deliberately deceptive it can only be for malicious intent.
Acknowledging such evil intent is not only terrifying but also leaves you with a very uncomfortable moral problem: what are you going to do about it?
No wonder you’d prefer to ignore black swans.
But here’s another one anyhow.
This time it’s an isolated Pacific island.
- 1For some reason that I don’t understand, admitting they were deceived (other than by magicians or performers) seems nearly impossible for most people