Infighting – a historical warning

Steve Kirsch claims the ‘no-virus-people’1Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey for example weren’t prepared to defend their science in a recorded public debate.2But there’s evidence they were – even though some, like Jon Rappaport consider such debate inappropriate.

The Breggins are dissing Mattias Desmet and the mass formation perspective.

Dr. Robert Malone is fending off ‘controlled opposition’ accusations, citing the historical example of Jacobinism as he does so.

Psychotherapist Todd Hayen thinks this infighting, intolerance and polarisation is consciously fostered to help the agenda.

The COVID-19 Fraud & War On Humanity

On November 11th Dr. Mark Bailey and Dr. John Bevan-Smith published a thorough exposé of the global deception, covering:

  • the “double deception” sustaining the illusion of a virus1“The COVID-19 crime against humanity requires the absence of this virus so there is no material reference against which the make-believe genome can be cross-checked, to establish, for instance, whether or not the purported SARS-CoV-2 proteins specifically stem from the alleged virus.”
  • the (dodgy) virology studies from various institutions
  • some of the key (pro-vaccine) players funding them
  • the (inappropriately used) PCR test
  • the (inaccurate) modelling of outbreaks
  • the (strange) objects pathologists have found in deceased jab recipients
  • the (liability-free) deals government made with vaccine producers…

In these two videos Dr. Sam Bailey summarises their work. You can download or read the original paper on her website.

  • 1
    “The COVID-19 crime against humanity requires the absence of this virus so there is no material reference against which the make-believe genome can be cross-checked, to establish, for instance, whether or not the purported SARS-CoV-2 proteins specifically stem from the alleged virus.”