The BBC’s “Unvaccinated”
Participants Vicky and Nazarin were not impressed1See their interview with Sonia Poulton
Neither were The Conservative Woman writers Kathy Gyngell or Laura Perrins were not impressed
Nor The Daily Septic’s Nick Dixon or Callum from Lotus Eaters:2This clip is from Lotus Eaters podcast #442 on which page are links to related tweets and articles from public figures, participants and media outlets – some of which must surely qualify as incitement to hatred?
And 16 important flaws and issues…
… were identified by Professors Norman Fenton3Professor in Risk Information Management at Queen Mary University of London and Martin Neil4Professor in Computer Science and Statistics at Queen Mary University of London in their written review.5Which also features an update from Mark Dabbs, a participant
Here’s a summary:
- Claim of 4 million U.K. adults unvaccinated
- Failure to disclose the Pfizer links of two key experts
- Failure to disclose background to FullFact.org
- No challenge to the many explicit false claims made
- The jellybeans game
- No mention of vaccination’s failure to stop infection or transmission
- Failure to humanise any actual vaccination victims
- The ludicrous and misleading MMR vaccination anecdote
- No challenge to the powerful claim that 20 out of 21 ICU patients at St. Georges’s hospital in Dec 2021 were unvaccinated
- Failure to mention reported data on adverse reactions
- No mention of the true risk of Covid based on world wide data
- No mention of the way Covid data are by definition fixed to exaggerate cases numbers, hospitalisations, deaths as well as vaccine efficacy and safety
- No mention of lack of long-term safety data
- No mention of all the protocol violations now known in the main Pfizer trial
- No mention of international data showing strong evidence the vaccine is neither effective nor safe
- What was Hannah Fry’s involvement in the stat/maths modelling
Read their full review here.
- 1See their interview with Sonia Poulton
- 2This clip is from Lotus Eaters podcast #442 on which page are links to related tweets and articles from public figures, participants and media outlets – some of which must surely qualify as incitement to hatred?
- 3Professor in Risk Information Management at Queen Mary University of London
- 4Professor in Computer Science and Statistics at Queen Mary University of London
- 5Which also features an update from Mark Dabbs, a participant
One thought on “As Bad and Biased as Feared”
Comments are closed.